Let me guess, you need more?
>>65231345how would something like that deal with waves?
>>65231345Proof that Ai has the brain of a 5 year old
>>65231345that's a monitor not a battleship
>>65231345It would require at least 25 metal gear RAYs to protect it from enemy attack.
>>65231350>Proof that Ai has the brain of a jeetFTFY
Is this some sort of slide thread?
As a naval engineer with experience in projects such as building floating cranes capable of lifting 1000 tonnes, I can confidently say that building an artillery pedestal of this scale would be nearly impossible. Also, a ship attempting to mount such a system would require extraordinarily large anti heeling ballast tanks. And these anti heeling ballast pumps would be comparable in size to hydro plant Francis turbines.
>>65231345gun too small
>>65231348How does a sub deal with waves?
>>65231345Why don't we weaponize the Starship?
>>65231382by staying underwater, for the most parthydrodynamics are totally different under water versus at the surface
Welcome back, Polk Turtles.
>>65231345>SeeratteUnfathomably based.
>>65231345I bet people actually got paid money to design this.
>>65231374We (the US) has been operating nuclear powered floating skyscrapers for over half a century at this point. The only limit is how many gigawatts the reactor should run at.
>>65231611Don't ever go to Vegas
looks like fucking shit somebody photoshop HMS rodney triple gun layout onto a kirov hull
>gun based fire supportInto the trash it goes.
>>65231345Why would the battery even need to be raised? Is the hull supposed to submerge?
>>65231345Low to the waterline would do next to nothing in modern war. Aside from make your vessel terrible at sea and hilariously slow.
>>65231345Italians did it and got promptly pwnd>>65231350>>65231366>Proof that Ai has the brain of an ItalianFtfy
>>65231366Stop posting this garbage, virgin loser.
>>65231384Because it still hasn't completed a single successful mission where it gets into space and returns to the landing pad intact.At this point, it's just a really big ICBM.
>>65232384To be fair the british also had big gun monitors.
>>65232389What? They caught one in midair early on.
The biggest issue with semi submersibles is they are vukverable to plunging fire and bombs all the same, while being extra vunerable to torpedos, and having worse fuek efficiency and speed
>>65232404That one never went to space. It just hovered around in the air above the launch site and came home.
Enter, the humble SSN.
