>destroys russia
>>65249847Their range is bigger. Depends on the payload
>>65249847What make this little goober so much better than a shasneed?
>>65249847how can the thing be 200k when just the wing is 6,7 million?
>>65250706Its based on bayraktar. Ottoman tech is superior to Persia.
>>65250706The shahed I believe is set and forget, so they can't really control it after it's taken off.
>>65250729No its saying the wing can go 6.7 miles on its own, no need for propulsion
>>65249847They should design it to run on hydrogen, the fuel cell can be the secondary explosive.
>>65250729Don't you understand blyatrunes? Clearly it says each wing causes on average 6,7 million USD in damage to the Russki economy.
>>65250765>>65250811thx anons, make much more sense now
turkish tech superior to iranian one
>>65250777Checked.
>>65249847>200k for 50 kg warhead and 1000km rangeThat's bullshit expensive >>65250756You can attach LTE/mesh or starlink dish if you have that like LUCAS
>>65250706In terms of speed yes in terms of economy no. I believe they use more expensive engine to fly at 300-400 km/h.
An-196 vs FP-2which is better at blowing up Russian stuff?
>>65249847At 200k a pop, when does it start making more sense to just develop a proper UCAV?
>>65252011At least an order of magnitude more cost
>>65250706literally nothing, it's more expensive but has a shorter range and a smaller payload. I think the electronics are less advanced too but I'm not sure
>>65252081MQ-1s cost $5M a piece. It doesn't seem outrageous that you could find an in-between from this thing to a Predator drone and make a ~$1M/unit UCAV.
Bayraktar now builds these kamikaze drones. K2 is particularly interesting as it has SATCOM, a FLIR and a dedicated jammer pod onboard. Comes with 2000+ km range and 200 kg warhead.https://youtu.be/lRnZ1-EtAiU?
>>65252187It's called a Tomahawk cruise missile.
>>65252211That's a different branch on the tech tree, dude.
>>65252169>brownoid using AINaturally.
>65252169Why do you based and trad types spend all day thinking about homosexuality?
>>65252195Isn't Bayraktar co-owned by the Ukrainian company Motor-Sich? It be might a joint development.
>>65249847*fails to block your path*
>>65249847How much does one of these puppies cost? What's the payload on it like?
>>65252285Kizilelma has a Motor Sich powerplant, but nothing else.
>>65250706Better?
>>65252288Firing a backblast launcher in the middle of a crowded street...
>>65252288Since the road sign is damaged in a similar way, this seems like the same scene from a different angle.
>>65252285>Isn't Bayraktar co-owned by the Ukrainian company Motor-Sich?They use Ukrainian engines on some of their platforms, but last I heard they plan on eventually replacing those with Turkish ones. The Ukrainians also tried to get in on helping the Turks with their fighter jet engine, but I haven't heard anything about if they're actually part of its development or not
>>65249847to be fair, it would destroy us too. Iran fucked our shit up before it started running low on munitions. If they could manufacture them like Ukraine it would have been ugly.Seems like low cost solutions are going to come online in the next few years though
>>65252169Russians are brownoid and fag lovers. Them getting smacked is based
>>65253290Russians flip flop on every position to whatever is convenient for them at that very moment.
>>65250777What about hydrazine mixed with nitromethane, should be able to run a top-fuel drone or two into Russia
>>65253312>What about hydrazine mixed with nitromethaneAs long as it's 1. a fair distance from me, 2. filmed in high definition.
>>65252288i love how people are just driving past dudes firing rockets. like damn nigga, they ain't firing you today if you're late!
>>65254114Keep your head down, don't get political.
>>65254114>they ain't firing you today if you're late!No they're not. Them, on the other hand...
>>65252119the real worth in these drones is in their guidance systems. they have to hit a specific target 2000km away without any satellite guidance on the way, the drone that does that best, wins. payload, price and range are secondary.
>>65250706The aero is better but it has to take off from a runway. Terminal guidance possibly better, depends on Starlink.
