[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: paris-air-raids-map.png (250 KB, 1439x1172)
250 KB PNG
>all 1918 Gotha bomber raids on Paris caused approximately 241 civilian deaths in total
>shells by the 'Paris Gun' killed about 250 civilians in Paris between March and August 1918
Why did the Germans even try to bombard the city with their flying soapboxes when they had a literal stratosphere gun available that did the job much better? The construction of WWI-era bombers and zeppelins seems like a total waste of resources and time when they could have just invested all that into u-boats and artillery.
>>
when you have a bunch of newfangled technology that's all being proclaimed as "the weapon of tomorrow" and shit like that you gotta actually use it to find out if it's any good or not
>>
>>65256860
They're much more mobile and longer-ranged than a railway gun

Gotha bombers actually dropped a pretty impressive bombload and couldn't be shot down with flak
And Zeppelins were nigh unstoppable
Even after the war ended, there was talk about banning bombers
Bombers were the atomic bombs or ballistic missiles of their time
>>
>7kg payload
lol
lmao
>>
>>65256870
>And Zeppelins were nigh unstoppable

...how was a giant whale full of explosive gas unstoppable?
>>
>>65258583
Remember that high altitude performance of 1914 fighters was garbage and it wasnt like we had decades of air defense experience to draw from for AAA. Zeppelins could legitimately bomb certain targets with impunity at altitude
>>
>>65258583
They were huge, covered in covered in defensive machine guns and flew at an altitude fewy few aircraft at the time could reach. With normal ball ammo, you just end up poking lots of tiny holes in it, which doesn't leak that quickly enough. Remember that there multiple separate gas tanks/balloons inside the structure and that they could also repaired in flight. Tracer rounds were invented specifically to ignite the zeppelin gas tanks, but even then they still had the altitude advantage for most of the war.
>>
File: ducksinarow.jpg (20 KB, 448x336)
20 KB JPG
>The shells were propelled at such a high velocity that each successive shot wore away a considerable amount of steel from the rifled bore. Each shell was sequentially numbered according to its increasing diameter, and had to be fired in numeric order, lest the projectile lodge in the bore and the gun explode.
Fuckign germans man
>>
>>65256860
to divert resources from the front into defending the home islands with AA, air raid bunkers, and air interception squadrons
>>
>>65258583
Zepps flew too high for the early planes to get to. It took 30 minutes for early fighters to get to their max altitude and usually it is still too low.
>>
File: worldwar170809.jpg (841 KB, 2048x1234)
841 KB JPG
>During 1917-18, the bombing raids on London resulted in 487 deaths and 1,434 other casualties. German squadron Bogohl 3 lost 24 Gothas as shot down or missing, with another 36 destroyed or seriously damaged in landing accidents.
>more losses due to landing than to enemy fire
Flying a giant WWI plane sounds like a nightmare.
>>
>>65259625
>fly a giant kite made out of thin steel and canvas with a lawnmower across the channel, drop bombs, then return and land it on some bicycle wheels
>oh, and no instruments or enclosed cockpit, too

Kamikaze even if they didn't have the word yet
>>
>>65256860
that mission towards german east africa by a zeppelin was epic. I will do an AI movie about that when the technology is ready.
>>
>>65259632
Flight duty was horribly dangerous in WW1, and the fact that they lost more planes on landing than to enemy fire should tell you why.

Hint: It has nothing to do with suicide missions.
>>
>>65258748
This is the actual answer, giant guns have barrel lifes measured in the high 10s to low 100s of rounds, and they're extremely expensive to make and not that hard to destroy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLwsl_BH1Gs
>>
>>65258748
Even crazier is the fact that the first few shells missed the targets by a literal mile because the Germans had forgotten to account for the coriolis forces, i.e. different parts of the surface of the earth rotate at different speeds depending on their latitude.
>>
File: Paris_Gun_Shellls_1918.png (221 KB, 967x845)
221 KB PNG
>>65256860
Now compare the impacts of the Paris Guns (they were 3) with the bomber hits.

It's also interesting to note that the guns were commanded by a vice-admiral and manned by navy gunners, because the German command thought that they navy would be better at shooting giant calibers.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.