>>65266305
i do not trust him

seems whenever he does Soviet vs. Allies / Axis armour the Soviet armour always either comes out on top
or he frames in a way that implies that the drawbacks of a Soviet tank were eliminated while omitting that the Axis / Allied armour was improved too

>>65266309
also his webblock (at least the old stuff) is fairly biased if iirc
like I remember him arguing that the Panzerfaust was overrated and that Molotovs probably would have performed just as well

buy an ad

>>65266313
>block
blog*

>>65266313
>also his webblock (at least the old stuff) is fairly biased if iirc
also can't forget the one time he argued that the loss-ratio on the eastern front was 1:1 by comparing Soviet permanent losses with Axis permanent + wounded

>>65266305
I find the model kits to be extremely corny. I dont know why, its rationally a perfectly normal way to provide an example of something; and that other guy who uses knockoff lego doesnt bother me, but for some reason the model kits are goofy to me. That aside, hes okay.