Is there any reason to buy one of their non-ACOG optics in current year?
>>65267116yeah, they're good. I don't know why you think their red dots are not worth it but their prism scopes are; theyre all expensive
>>65267138>I don't know why you think their red dots are not worth it
>>65267160my point is, what, would you would use these arguments for why the ACOG is worth it? or is Holosun shilling all you know
>>65267116You support Michigan made products. Although not their entire product line is made their, but supposedly the only other assembly facilities are in California and Japan.
>>65267294Yeah, I see it.
>>65267116The VCOG is the best LPVO I have used.
>>65267294EOTech is the superior Michigan optic company
>>65267116What if elon got into optics?
>>65267340I actually like the guy, but I don't want a Starlinked scope and besides that I don't really see what the appeal would be.
Their accupoint lpvos are well regarded
>>65267116I bought a used RX30 and, while it is ungodly heavy for what it is, the fucker has survived innumerable trips through swamplands that no other red dot has.
>>65267138Trijicon’s prism scope aren’t outclassed by their competitors the same way their dots are. Take the RCR for instance. Even on sale it usually goes for around 679 to 699. Why would you ever buy that when the Aimpoint ACRO sells for 617?
>>65267353Optics integrated with neuralink
>>65267402Because Swedes are S T O R gay.
>>65267408Niggalink? Powered by microfent reactors? Then you have my attention.
>>65267402Another perfect example is the SRO vs the 507 comp. The 507Comp offers shake awake and multiple different reticle settings, has a wider window, doesn’t require you to re-zero the optic after changing the battery, and doesn’t have the issue of the slide overhang potentially causing failures that the SRO has. It is also 200 dollars cheaper than the SRO. The only thing the SRO has over the 507 is slightly better glass, and even then it’s not so much of an improvement that it justifies a 200 dollar price jump
>>65267160Not buying temu junk
>>65267416+ livestreaming directly from optic to xitter
>>65267116I put Trijicon Credo 1-6 LPVOs on all my rifles (the ones with the red segmented circle). Perfectly bright enough.I would buy >>65267327 in a second because I'm sick of mounting scopes but I've never used FFP before.
>>65267160add 'indestructible' on the Holosun's pro side.
>>65267116the only reason to buy trijicon is to flex on poors. that's it. Totally valid reason btw.
>>65267116I'm a huge fan of the accupoint. The post reticle is amazing for point shooting up to 100 yards and the tritium is great for outdoor use so that you don't have to worry about battery degradation from temperature. I think it's a must have for hunting in any kind of woodland environment.
>>65267160Solar on small electronics is such a joke. In many cases the life of the panel is only slightly longer than the battery it replaces. Except now you need an entirely new device instead of just replacing a cheap battery.
>>65268134Isn't there a replaceable battery in it, so if the solar dies it doesn't matter?
>>65267116I’m not made of gold, that’s the main reason
>>65268134The original meme is worded poorly. The Holosun dots function primarily off of traditional batteries, but have a solar failsafe. The only 100% solar dots they sell are the SCS line
>>65267116I was thinking of buying their iron sights to replace the stock irons on my Glock. Should I not??
>>65268207Depends on if you plan to run optics or not. If you do, than yeah, get a pair of their optic height sights. If not, I’d stick to TruGlo TFX pros
>>65267454I though you could change the battery of the SRO without altering zero. It's top loading. Also how much wider are we really talking lol the SRO has a pretty big window, especially in height. I'm pretty sure it's a perfect circle
>>65267116>>65267160fuck off chink
>>65267160>solar gimmick
>>65267327I also heavily recommend the VCOG especially the 1-8 SCO, super durable and glass is excellent. Most fags complain about the weight or the illumination but weight is not much vs other lpvo's with mounts and those fags should lift more. If interested get a really nice second hand one, they go anywhere from 1300 to 1600.
>>65268242
>>65268191>worded poorly>dont need to remove optic to swap battery No the anon is just retarded. It made total sense to me first time I read it.
>>65267353>I like the man associated with pestering maxlaine ghiswell to join little saint james island, wants more indian migration, a tranny son and faggy fuckin electric cars
>>65268418hes chinamogging so he's based, fuck china
>>65268442miga amirite cliff diver?
>>65268448no im not a fan of Israel, just a fan of the US being the most powerful force on earth, and in orbit, and on the moon, and on mars
>>65267160As a trijicon and holosun owner I'm inclined to agree. I've got two RMRs, one I've had for over a decade and the other a few years less. I've had zero issues with either of them(after tape shimming the gen1) but I've also had zero issues with my holosun.>>65268270Fwiw I really do like the bigger window on the 507, I've only got RMRs and not the SRO but it's a really nice change, particularly on larger or heavier recoiling guns. Fits my G21 well.
>>65267160This makes fellow amerilards seethe but it's undeniable overall that Trijicon got really fucking lazy on guv milbux and stopped innovating, coasting on brandname and LE SPEC OPS EL1T3 bullshit. That said>no parallaxThis makes you look retarded. None of those, nor anything holosun or trijicon makes, are holographic. All plain red dots are the same when it comes to that, and for the purposes of handguns it's effectively irrelevant. Any RDS is fine. Even holographic honestly makes no real difference anyway except through nods.
>>65268448chink detected
>>65268534
>>65267116No. Trijicon is for ACOGs.
>>65268270eh ok it is a little wider but damn it is that a fat dot
>>65268815They’re making a new one with an even fatter window
>>65268448Thought he was a Nazi?
>>65267160RMR has a better dot.
>>65267116They take their customers for a ride, charge obscene amounts for an optic that is out performed by prisms and dot mahnifier combos that on top of costing less, perform better,, and weigh less, have been restibg on their laurels for 20+ years and like Aimpoint and EOTech deserve to be kicked in the teeth in the hopes that maybe they'll give a damn about selling something worth a damn.
>>65268765A powerful nonarguement.
>>65267160My Holosun broke, I own three RMRs and all three still work.
>>65269658>charge obscene amounts for an optic that is out performed by prisms and dot mahnifier combos that on top of costing less, perform better,,Honestly couldn't put it better myself. If you're a retard who can't spell for shit or type, you don't need an ACOG. Just buy the chink prism and blast trash like God intended.If you're white buy an ACOG, you can afford it.
>>65269753How?
>>65269770It just quit working. Went to the range once, just some casual shooting, nothing crazy. Didn't even take any bumps or get smacked into anything. Next time I pick the rifle up, the dot is gone. My guess? There's some shit wrong with the electronics. Yes, I tried replacing the battery, and yes, I know how to turn it on it's not just stuck off.It was extra embarrassing because I made a whole long post about how great the holosun was before it happened. And it is, it's better in every way compared to the RMR. The tint is better, the dot is clearer, you don't have to remove it to change the battery. That post I quoted is 100% accurate on those points. Except, it died. None of my RMRs have ever had a problem.And so I have no use for holosun, because I'm not interested in any optic I can't trust.
>>65267454I have a SRO on a full auto FAL. It can handle the recoil at least.
>>65267116I guess if you have acute Americanitis but are also too poor to buy an HTX-1.
>>65269776Can I have it?
>>65269904Yeah sure
>>65269757>If you're white you'd waste your money on i50 year old ibferior tech so that I can feel better about my 700$ used ACOG purchase I made so I could larp as an Army man and now I project my angst over the recruuter who never called back onto ecerybody who laughs at my dumb purchasesIf you weren't actually poor, you'd buy a Razor, a NF, or an Elcan seeing as they all offer performance their pricetag commands. But as they say about a ACOG owner and his money...>>65269776>tldr; what do you mean the dot was turned off?
>>65269997The Elcan is heavy as fuck and has moving parts for no reason, the night force is also heavy as fuck and more fragile than a ACOG, ACOG is fucking based
>>65267160>"made in china being a con is... le bad!"
>>65269997>Elcanfwiw Elcan is routinely criticized for being outdated in design like the ACOG, especially with having equally poor eye relief
>>65270248Nas
>>65269997>>tldr; what do you mean the dot was turned off?No, the dot was not turned off.>If you weren't actually poor, you'd buy a Razor, a NF,Oh cool, I bought two NFs, good to know I'm not poor. Now, come up with a new point you little retard.>elcanTotal junk. ACOG has better glass, no piss tint, and weighs half as much for the same magnification. Its only use is a variable magnification gimmick that became obsolete the second the red dot was made.The ACOG is the best optic for 5.56 rifles.
>>65269023christ that's too much
>>65267454>shake awakeUseless. No, I don't want my optic with a five year battery life to turn off for no reason, thanks. It can just stay on and omit the failure point.>multiple different reticle settingsJust a dot for me, you keep the clutter.>doesn’t require you to re-zero the optic after changing the batteryNeither does the SRO. I think you just don't know what you're talking about.
>>65270651>IM NOT POOR CHUD LOOK AT "MY" NF SCOPES ON MY RENTAL LMT>BESIDES THE ELCAN SUCKS CUZ ITS WEIGHS A WHOLE 5 OUNCES MORE THAN MUH ACOKLol, poor, stupid, and weak. No wonder you like the ACOG, besides the poverty larp, theres nothing for you to figure out how to turn on and off. Keep coping, champ. Maybe if you sold your dog shit ACOG, you can actually afford a real optic instead of whatever the hell this gay larp of yours, is supposed to be.
>>65270753...Do you think that LMT is a rental because you can't read? That's not what the sticker says.>BESIDES THE ELCAN SUCKS CUZ ITS WEIGHS A WHOLE 5 OUNCES MORE THAN MUH ACOKThe Elcan weighs half a pound more than a TA31+RMR+QD mount. That is rather significant for an optic that does the exact same job less effectively.>copingWhy do people who cope always whine about coping? Do you think this will work, like what is the actual endgoal there? Just pre-emptively whine about what you're doing because you're insecure?Let me be clear: You are coping out loud because you can't afford an ACOG. No, a magnifier is not the same. It is much worse. No, a chink prism is not the same, it is much worse.
>>65269997You've clearly never owned any of the optics you're talking about.
>>65270809He can't even own guns is my guess. Dude can't speak English and yet is picking teams and shilling anyway.
>>65270775>IM NOT COPING I CAN'T AFFORD AN ELCAN YUR COPING VUZ UMM YU CAN'T AFFORD A 750$ ACOG CGUDI have an ACOG retard, didn't even have to pah for it :)Oh and a TA31 with ootic, mount and RMR ehich is a shit setup in general, weighs 17 ounces, while a Elcan DR clocks in at 22. And no, your TA31 isnt "just as good". Sorry, champ.Nice setup though, never seen such a prestine "I've never actually shot this thing" stack of bullshit in my life, but I like the idea you bought an LNT lower because why? The Aero precision upper, the iton sights that don't match in color, and the Surefire without a tape switch. Just screams how gjns are a fashion statement and you have the taste of a socal valley girl.
>>65270848>I have an ACOG retard, didn't even have to pah for it :)Sure.>weighs 17 ounces,Not quite>while a Elcan DR clocks in at 2223 oz, going to be more when you add a red dot>and no, your TA31 isnt "just as good"Of course not, it's better. Better reticle, better mount (god I hate that ARMS bullshit), lighter weight, better glass, and no piss filter.>but I like the idea you bought an LNT lower because why?That's a Daniel Defense lower. Because that's a Daniel Defense upper. It's a Daniel Defense rifle. Did you mean LMT lower? It's not even an LMT lower, like do you even know what those look like? I do, here's one on a different rifle. The one on bottom, in case you got confused.>The Aero precision upper....Do you think the A on the upper means it's Aero Precision? That's not what that means. I don't think Aero even uses that forge.>the iton sights that don't match in color,you'll be way more mad when you learn how much those cost, and that they're not supposed to match in color.>and the Surefire without a tape switch.Why would you use a tape switch? Just lowers the output and doesn't make the light any easier to use. I know, because I have one and you don't.
>>65270848not him but post proofs or shut up. Your rage is oozing out of the edges of my screen
I can feel the key strokes charged with impotent rage.
>>65270887The constant spelling errors add to the charm. Homie's so mad he can't tell the red squiggles all over his screen from the red clouding his vision, blood vessels all primed to burst.
>>65267160Add "all internals are made in china" to the trijicon.
>>65270872>do you even know what those look like?Doesn't it just look like a milspec lower that says LMT instead of PSA?
>>65270848>I have an ACOGmay we see it?
>>65270872Why would you add a dot to an Elcan you fucking retard, the whole point of the dual reticle is you have a 1x integrated into your 4x.>I.I.IIIITS NOT AN AERO PRECISION UPPER BRO ITS TOTALLY DANIEL DEFENSE BRO AERO PRECISION DOESN'T EVEN USE ANCHOR FORINGS BROUh huh>BUH BUH ALL TEB 733T ES SPESIAL FURCES DON NEED NO TAPE SWITCH BRO IT LOWERS THE OUTPUT BRO IT DOESNT EVEN MAKE IT EASIER TO USE BRORiiight.>>65270874>>65271004Prove what? That I have an ACOG sitting on my rifle? I could take pictures next tkme I'm on the range but I'll be spending most of my time shooting my .50 cal so it might be difficult. Why would I even be mad? The TA31 sucks ass, and when I can get a dot plus magnifier that performs better under NODS for less than a TA31., why would I be upset?
>>65271102>Why would you add a dot to an Elcan you fucking retardPassive aiming under night visionA true 1x that I can use both eyes open with no need to flip a lever The real question is who besides military procurement bean counters actually wants a prism 1x? Red dot always wins even if you have to go chinweld.
Elcanslollmao
>>65271118>The real question is who besides military procurement bean counters actually wants a prism 1x?People with astigmatism
>>65271138I have asstigmytism and I still make red dots work better than a prism 1x. Just reduce the brightness.
>>65271118>BUH BUH MUH NODS BROHe said with an ACOG with a piggybacked RMR, easily one of the most dog shit ways to passively aim.Bro, buddy, pal, guy, friend, fraulein, my little pog champ. If you need to use NODs with your rifle, you're not using a magnified optic, you're not seriously shooting with a piggybacked pistol dot, you're using a flip to side magnifier generally speaking. If you have money or are doing some real spooky shit, you run a PVS14 over your non dominant eye, and you have a clip on or rail attached PVS 14 on your rifle, giving you passive nightvision, as well as the ability to actually shoot under night vision. However, nobody fucking likes these setups at all, because it weighs a ton, like 16+ lbs, and now you're at risk of losing two separate tubes instead of just one.But seeing as you're too much of a broke ass pussy to buy a can and an LAM, I'm not surprised you use Lucas Botkin as a primary source as to how to shoot under night vision.
>>65271102>no image postedlmao
>>65271102>I'll be spending most of my time shooting my .50 calright
Jesus people are crashing out in this thread. What causes Trijicon to make people seethe this badly?
>>65271449unironically their superiority. the mro a shit though
Can you use an ACOG if you have to crank the diopter on every prism/scope you use? Are they build to not need one?It seems like you're fucked if it's blurry.
>>65271605the MRO is fine, especially the newer ones.
>>65268460That's impossible with the current leadership.
>>65271747Iranian detected
>>65270914no, it has extra paddles and buttons and gizmos, and the triggerguard holes are drilled wrong as a prank>>65271102>>I.I.IIIITS NOT AN AERO PRECISION UPPER BROYes, that's right. Want to see the receipt?>Riiight.Yes, it is right. My hand is already right there at the light tailcap. Why would I even want a remote switch? There's a reason I only put them on rifles I let other people shoot, like this.
>>65271188>Bro, buddy, pal, guy, friend, fraulein, my little pog champWhy do you talk like a pedophile trying to pick up abused girls on tumblr?
>>65271449The better something is, the more deranged its haters. You have to be severely mentally ill to hate the ACOG.
>>65268418Elon is literally the savior of humanity.Seethe and cope.
>>65268418>I like the man associated with pestering maxlaine ghiswell to join little saint james islandThat never happened.>a tranny sonWho he disowned and considers murdered by the left>and faggy fuckin electric carsWhat's the matter gramps, sad about your 0-60? Or did your transmission break again?
>>65272247Why does your breathe still manage to stink of dick when your Dad isn't around to fuck your mouth?>>65272244>Installing a Aimpint on a QD larue mount when all Aimpoints come factory with a QD>Now intentionally hiding the rollmark on "his" rifles>BUH BUH BUH I DON'T NEED A LIGHTSWITCH BRO, LIEK IM SO HII SPEED I DON'T NEED IT BRONot beating them retard nor those poor allegations, buddy.
>>65272598>Now intentionally hiding the rollmark on "his" rifles...The rollmark is right there. Are you blind or what? >Installing a Aimpint on a QD larue mount when all Aimpoints come factory with a QD1 thumbscrew mounts are not QD and suck ass2 I didn't install anything on that aimpoint, it's surplus and came that wayGoddamn you are physically incapable of being correct, aren't you?>BUH BUH BUH I DON'T NEED A LIGHTSWITCH BROThe tape switch is literally right there. It's in the picture. You need glasses and a new phone.>Not beating them retard nor those poor allegations, buddy.Buying a new, more expensive mount that works better is poverty how exactly? Do you even know, or are you just imitating human speech and hoping no one notices you're just stringing random words together?Anyway, here's another rifle for you to seethe about, go ahead.
>>65272598Feel free to post your acog at anytime, much less a single rifle that you own. I'm embarrassed for you at this point.
