[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!

[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous
 No.65268412
File: 1762411385812674.jpg (231 KB, 2490x955)
231 KB JPG
 No.65268412
CFTs NEVER looked good on anything
>>
Anonymous
 No.65268472
 No.65268472
File: OIP (4).jpg (299 KB, 1920x1536)
299 KB JPG
The super hornet with cft looks way better than the j10with cft.
>>
Anonymous
 No.65268496
 No.65268496
>>65268472
Then again, just about any and every change you make to the look of the F-18 will be an improvement.
>>
Anonymous
 No.65268541
 No.65268541
File: 2000w_q95.jpg (351 KB, 2000x1331)
351 KB JPG
>>
Anonymous
 No.65269503
 No.65269503
File: F-4XCFT.jpg (38 KB, 869x336)
38 KB JPG
>>
Anonymous
 No.65272591
 No.65272591
File: Typhoon-CFT-Al-Ain.jpg (219 KB, 1024x576)
219 KB JPG
>>65268472
>>65268541
literally the only good example
>>
Anonymous
 No.65272615
 No.65272615
>>65272591
that's horrible
>>
Anonymous
 No.65272650
 No.65272650
File: 7203445.jpg (1.16 MB, 1600x1079)
1.16 MB JPG
>>65268412
That's just crazy talk.
>>
Anonymous
 No.65272938
 No.65272938
>>65268412
why not CFT on B-52, C-130, etc instead of non-drop tanks on wings?

Less weight on fuselage for wings to carry?
>>
Anonymous
 No.65274400
 No.65274400
>>65272938
Maybe the same reason F-16s carry AMRAAMs on the wingtip stations, damps out vibration/twisting in the wings
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.