It takes glock mags and AR triggers/handguards, is explicitly rated for +P (but not Super) and costs $2000 after shipping, tax, and transfer fee. What do we think?
>>65270854I both massively hate but somewhat at the same time like this.
>$2000 fucking lel, what a joke, domestic manufacturing really did die to Turkshit and Rugerslop didn't it?this would be cool if it was $700 and rated for 45 Super and had a 6" barrel.
another image in actionweight is 4lbs 10oz with just the stock and no optic/suppressor
>.45acp>straight pullThis meant to be a large suppressor host?Also, what mags does it take?
>>65270868>reddit spacing>didn't read the postGo back
For comparison, Savage 110pcs can be had under $1000 and comes in "real" rifle chamberings.
>>65270854>$2000lollmao even
>>65270858Someone has to pay for the CNC monkey's degree. And it sure as hell isn't them.
>>65270921>someone has to pay for the loanbased and true, muslims were right about banning compound interest
>>65270868Looks like glock mags and yeah suppressor host. With stock and optic might be good to 100 yards, but a 230 fmj would drop about 12 inches at that range.At least you won't have to police your brass?
I've unironically wanted something like this for a long time but $2000 and from a literal who manufacturer is absurd.
For this price you can do an actual straight-pull AR with a custom 458 Socom barrel with no gas port which will have the appropriate twist rate for heavy subs
>black gun>AR-15 >glock mags>$2000I can't wait to not buy it
>>65270854This gun reeks of the European regulatory mind.
>>65270854>not rated for SuperThat would be the only reason anyone would get it. Otherwise just do >>65270884 in .300BO
>glock magsGAYYY
Solo300 comes in under 500$ (just for an upper though), in 300 blackout with 3 barrel lengths and 4 handguard lengths (and an option to have no handguard). And the bolt handle is ergonomically correct as it is on the left side of the receiver. And you can put any regular AR barrel you want in.
>>65270951Yeah. If the whole point is "suppressed at range" .300 blackout with 220 grain OTM would work out to about 150 yards. .45 would be lucky to hit 100 before it drops like a stone.
>>65270854So what? Is it supposed to be a supresor host for a fat chungus can and then you can brace it and you have a weird modern delisle thing?
>>65270854See, this would be the perfect platform for a modern DeLisle. Remove that janky ass hand guard, use that space for a resonator, and put a big ass delisle can on the end of it, with a stock.
>>65270854>What do we thinkHide thread
>>65270939Nah, barrel too short.
>>65271034>resonatorWe call it a "reflex" when it comes to suppressors
>>65270854>2kfor what fucking purpose. maybe with a giant integrated can and a brace it would be a retarded delise carbine copy? seems retarded bro idk
>>65271132>Americans discover reflex suppressors 30 years laterGuys please don't, we have flow throughs now, why do you want to live like we Europeans did in 1998 with cope reflex cans
>>65271330probably to keep the OAL as short as possible considering it is a 'pistol'id rather see a barrel that was ported for supression in the first place and then a big long as can
>waow fowty five wit da suppwessorit is 2026
>>65270854>meme caliber>meme operating system>based on a meme rifle (AR is goyslop)>ml*k>muh canz muh ninja gun broworst gun of the year desu
>>65270854Would consider for $800.
save yourself a bunch of money and just buy a CVA scout pistol
>>65270921CNC student here. Pell grants more than cover community college tuition. A used beat to shit CNC mill costs as much as my entire certification program, a new one 10x as much. IIRC getting a FFL for manufacturing also costs a fuckton.None of this excuses a $2K unit price though.
>>65270854What is the purpose behind not just making it an actual semi-auto .45 AR?
>>65270868Honestly this is kinda cool it's like a new and improved delisle carbine. It's ausie gun? Can we get it in the states?
>>65271788>new and improved delisle carbinechecked, don't see howNor is there a point to it
How is a .45 bolt AR not able to handle .45 Super?
>>65270854Actually want thisAlready have g30 magsDe Lisle rifles are finicky and expensive
>>65270912They actually dont want to sell any its a charade to keep a manufacturing license
>>65271557you have never touched a gun in your whole entire life, and you never will.
>>65271418Still doesn't make a whole lot of sense for a bolt action that smallI can still see a use case for regular rifle sized manual actions, but for a .45 any lightweight suppressor would probably be quite enough
>>65272049It probably could. 45 Super isn't SAAMI specced so I guess manufacturers can't lawfully advertise a gun as being capable of handling it.
