>already has a working canopy design>proceed to steal F-35 canopy design anywayWhy are they like this?
Fit Amy looks so secks
Chinks are retarded.
>>65272741implessive
THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY LIKE THIS
>>65272741The funnier part is they didn't even understand why the F-35's canopy opens that way.
>>65272741my best guess is they really wanted to fit those 10 extra gallons of fuel behind the pilot
>>65272761I don't know that, either. Why does it do that?
>>65272772NTA, but I think it's because the lifting fan housing is located where the hinge/motor is supposed to be.
>>65272774yeah exactly, but the J-35 doesn't have a lift fan variant so... lol chinks.
>>65272774>>65272780>A front-opening hinge makes it significantly easier to remove and install the ejection seat. Mechanics can service the seat and access instrumentation in front of the cockpit without the time-consuming and hazardous process of removing the canopy entirely. For stealth aircraft, minimizing the number of access panels is crucial to avoid compromising the radar cross-section. Forward-hinged canopies allow vital electronics to be serviced directly beneath the windscreen, negating the need for extra maintenance doors on the fuselage.It had fuck all to do with the lifting fan. I don't know why you tried so hard to sound like you knew what you're talking about.
>>65272741It's because the J-35 is not an evolution of the FC-31. They look similar because they're both intended to look like a knockoff F-35, but they're completely different aircraft.
IP is a purely Jewish corruption of Western civilization.Romans made it a point to teach Latin to everyone, and even Slaves could become lawyers.Pagans never had "secrets of temple", just people with busy lives willing to let the pros handle it, like taking car to a Smog Shop.Chinese don't abide copyright, IP any more than a White man would consider a haircut "patentable".
>>65272789you asked an AI and you're trying to tell me I don't know about a program I know intimately? jesus, chinkshills are getting sad.
>>65272916>doubles downAlright bro
>>65272916Cite your source for it being because of the lifting fan. I'll wait.
>>65272869IP exist since antiquity, retard. They call it "secret recipe", "secret device" or "secret blacksmith method. And there are closely guarded by families, clan and even states. That is why Damascus steel is not widely available.
>>65272942And now it's a lost art. IP is a dead end.
>>65272922>>65272919have you actually seen the F-35B?the clearance between the lift fan hatch and the canopy is virtually nila 2nd reason is modular construction; a rear hinge mechanism would have to sit in between / be overlapped by two modules which at the time were separately-designed and -built, and it was ultimately easier to put the hinge in front than to redesign the modules, in addition to the lift fan problem aboveas with many engineering matters, the final design solved multiple problems at once. or perhaps it might be said, the final design was forced by having to solve multiple simultaneous problems>>65272789>remove and install the ejection seatyour retarded Ai summary neglected to specify that this is a broad generalisation off of the specific case of the Mig-21>Forward-hinged canopies allow vital electronics to be serviced directly beneath the windscreenfuck that shit, the F-35 actually had difficulty with the nose electronics routing because of the unusual hinge arrangementfuck Ai and anyone who believes in that bullshit
>>65272741>Why are they like this?that's how reverse-engineering is done, you copy a design and then run it to learn what problems it solves
>>65272983It still makes sense for the J-35 to have it.1. When the aircraft evolved from the experimental FC-31 into the carrier-ready J-35, the entire fuselage was overhauled. Designers raised the area right behind the cockpit to smooth out airflow across the top of the jet and blend it into the twin-engine housing. Once that spine is raised, a traditional rear-hinged canopy (which requires space to swing downward and backward) no longer fits smoothly. The forward hinge accommodates this raised, aerodynamically efficient spine.2.Just as the US standardized the F-35 canopy across three branches, China is standardizing the J-35 across multiple services: By keeping the cockpit and canopy architecture identical between the Air Force and Navy models, China streamlines manufacturing, reduces costs, and speeds up part production.3. On a crowded aircraft carrier deck or inside a tight hangar, space is a premium.-Easier Egress/Ingress: A forward-hinging canopy doesn't require massive vertical clearance over the back of the jet.-Avionics Access: With the canopy flipped forward, maintenance crews can easily pull out the ejection seat or access the sensitive electronic bays directly behind the cockpit without having to detach the entire glass canopy structure.4. At high speeds, if a canopy latch fails on a rear-hinged aircraft, the oncoming wind can rip the glass completely off. A forward-hinged canopy uses the natural force of the oncoming wind to keep the canopy pushed down against the airframe, which allows for a slightly lighter locking and framing mechanism.
>>65273003Now give me a recipe for blueberry pie.
>>65273003implessive
>>65272942prove any such "secrets" existed Hint: there are zero legit artifacts of anything Jewish, Christian or Muslim older than 1000AD. Its all "books from other books" or Pagan stuff reconned into later religion.protecting a trade secret isn't same as IP.maybe the steel was just hard to make and not normally needed.
>>65273014Blueberry pie is a quintessential North American dessert born from a combination of Native American traditions and European settler baking methods. Because the fruit is native to the Americas, early settlers adapted their traditional meat and berry pie recipes to incorporate local wild blueberries.Native American Roots & Early SettlersFor thousands of years, indigenous peoples gathered wild blueberries—which they called “star berries” due to the five-pointed blossom. They ate them fresh, dried them for the winter, and used them in stews, soups, and meat preservation. When European settlers arrived in the 1600s, they discovered these sweet and tart berries and began baking them into traditional pastry crusts.Written Records in the 19th CenturyThe exact date the first blueberry pie was baked remains undocumented, but the first written mention of “blueberry pie” appeared in a passing reference in the November 1829 edition of The New England Farmer.1850: Mrs. Bliss's Practical Cook Book published the first written recipe for the dessert.1872: The Appledore Cook Book documented a full recipe, helping cement its popularity and association with the wild blueberries of Maine.Commercialization and Modern PopularityIn the early 20th century, agricultural developments allowed the blueberry to be cultivated on a commercial scale. Botanist Frederick V. Coville and farmer Elizabeth White successfully domesticated highbush blueberries, making the fruit widely available for year-round baking. By the mid-20th century, blueberry pie became a staple of summer picnics, state fairs, and holiday celebrations.Regional LegacyThe dessert is famously associated with the state of Maine, where wild lowbush blueberries grow abundantly. In 1990, after a campaign championed by a local fifth-grade student, blueberry pie was officially designated as the State of Maine's official dessert.Oh wait you said recipe
Maybe because the new canopy was just better?Sure, Chinks do shamelessly steal everything, but they're not retarded about it - they are not cargo cultists. If they changed their design, it's because the new one was, in some measurable way, better
>>65273107>in some measurable way, betterYeah for the designers bank balance! Heyooooooooooo!
>>65273107>chinesium is better because they copied it>they copied it so it has to be better
>>65273189You're faking it. I can tell.
>>65273107implessive
Copy this
>>65272789Doesn't the seat go in before the canopy goes on?And once you pop the seat, isn't most of the cockpit in need of replacement anyways due to rocket exhaust, if any of the airframe is even reusable?And if the seat was punched, doesn't the canopy explosively separate?And if you mean for typical maintenance inspection, can't they just remove the canopy, or design the seat in a manner that regular inspection and maintenance is possible with it in situ?
>>65272789>Mechanics can ...access instrumentation in front of the cockpit without the time-consuming and hazardous process of removing the canopy entirelyThis makes no sense.
>>65276519that is said to be the reason for the Mig-21's forward-hinged cockpitthe Mig-21 of course has a nose air intake, so it has particularly little space for its electronics which must be stuffed elsewhere on the airframeAi being Ai, of course it made a sweeping generalisation instead of specifying that it was a design choice specific to a particular platformand retards parrot it unquestioningly so they can look smart with the help of Aithe future is a giant game of Telephone, and nobody cares
>>65276636I hate A.I. Anyone working on it should be executed for Crimes Against Humanity.
>>65272741Vely impleassive, vely ching khu lung
>>65273003Supah supah supah impleassive!
>>65276658>ching khu lungis that even chinese
>>65276665Look the phrase in the archives
>>65276699okay>it's one anon trying to force a barely-intelligible memeholy cringe
>>65272983That's a circular argument, there's no space there because they put the hinge at the front in the first place. It's not like as if putting an extra two inches behind the cockpit is going to make a difference.
>>65276980The location of the lift fan is determined by the center of gravity, you can't just move it back a few inches.
>>65272942Secrets are not the same as IP. It's only IP if there's a law that designates an owner and punishes those who use it without that the owner's permission.
>>65277043Sure you can. After all, the center of gravity changes all the time - fuel consumption, ammunition usage, control surfaces, landing gear etc.
>>65276980>just move the whole cockpit forward a few inches bro, it certainly won't fuck up the internal architecture or anythingif it could have been done without unacceptably compromising the insides, they would have
>>65277123The F-35 has three different variations much bigger than this one small change.
>>65277139Now that's a circular argument:>They made changes to different versions of the F-35 so they can make this change>They can make this change because they made changes to different versions of the F-35
>>65273107Better for turning Chinese tax dollars into a payday for a politician and his friends in the tofu dregs MIC.
>>65276648U
>>65277172No, it's a perfectly logical line of reasoning, unlike your line of reasoning which really was circular and which you are clearly ass-blasted about.
>>65276730>Chinkesoid screechingVelah impleassive
>>65277192>seething that people reject the false promise of "A.I" (markov chains)kek brownoid.
>>65277070The reason designing good aircraft is ruinously expensive is due in large past to managing and controlling all of those things.
>>65277252Your outrage is entirely performative.
>>65275845literally alien tech
>>65272741Why bother doing spending billions in R&D when you can just steal the enemy's design for a fraction of the price ?
>>65272919>>65272922>seething chink hit post too soon Lol
>>65272869State protected IP is roughly 3k years old, jackass.
>>65273041actual documented as trade practice craftsman marks were enforced in god damn Assyrian Empire
>>65277635>>65277651>well, you see, technically, trademark and trade dress are aspects of intellectual property even though you were clearly talking about copyright and patent law
