Opinions on the Carl Gustaf?
>>65306768Geez anon, she's like what, 9?
>>65306772Out of 10!
>>65306768Is there a way to improve it so that it doesn't destroy the operator's hearing and mangle their situational awareness in real time?
>>65306801Get a javelin then.
>>65306768I have opinions on that prime age female holding it.
>Bagdonas
Imagine the chick lean.
>>65306768>Letting your daughter dress like thatWhy are so much men dayouth
>>65306801put it on a tripod or a lafette, combine it with remote aim and a remote trigger.
>>65306818Kind of based... i know its wrong but im erect
>>65306801I recall seeing a segment on Future Weapons where Mack fires some launcher, want to say it was a CG or variant, with a low backblast round. He fired it inside a small room no problem. Wonder what that would do to longevity of its users.
>>65306868>dayouthAre you a bong and thus know about shitskin lingo from firsthand experience, or just racist like me?
dose of brain damage with every shot.favored by USMC.BTW, my experts say stuff like hearing and brain damage is 95% "delayed", so shit like where the UK gives troops "hearing tests" after a ride in their new IFV is useless. What will happen is about a year after they get out they will go deaf.Ditto with USMC CG brain damage.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_HernandezAfter his death, researchers at Boston University studied Hernandez's brain and diagnosed him with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), stage 3 of 4,[8][164][165] and described Hernandez's brain as a classic case of the pathology.[165][166][167] CTE is caused by repeated head trauma.[8] Hernandez had two confirmed concussions since he began playing football at eight years old, but the Boston Globe believed "he undoubtedly took other punishing hits to the head that were never recorded".[8] CTE is associated with cumulative injuries. In a phone conversation recorded in prison, Hernandez said "I'm like a grandpa. All my bones are so sore."[34]
>>65306927iirc that episode he fired the AT4CS, not the gustafit uses saltwater to absorb the backblast
>>65307038Thats what it was. But you did lead me to find they make similar rounds for the CG so I'm still curious about health issues.https://cat-uxo.com/explosive-hazards/projectiles/84mm-heat-655-cs-projectile
>>65306768About how far will it throw her?
>>65307092What part of recoilless is hard to comprehend
>>65307092It's a recoilless rifle
>>65306801Saltwater counter charge, it'll absorb most of the blast, allowing for relatively safe use in closer areas, and for less concussive blast.There already exist AT4s and M72s loaded like this. SLIGHT reduction in range, but hardly unacceptable or a dealbreaker.
>>65306801https://www.edrmagazine.eu/feindef-2025-instalaza-unveils-hispano-mpw-its-new-90-mm-multipurpose-weapon
>>65307085oh neat, I'm qualed on the gustaf and I didn't even know those rounds existed
>>65307096>>65307099ive seen a russian mil tuber fire an at4 recoilless rifle and getting his eye rekt by the recoil driving the optic into his eye.
>>65307208Because he was a retarded baboon and didn't brace it properly.
>>65307208The AT4 is notable for not being fully recoilless which is why it has a shoulder stop.The zigger didn't deploy it even though there is literally a picture urging you to do that on the fucking tube.
>>65307092It won't.
>>65307222>>65307221>is notable for not being fully recoilless which is why it has a shoulder stop.the carl gustav also has a shoulder stop... why would it need that if it were truly recoilless?
>>65307208monkey operator
>>65307257Go watch one of the 647,545 fire drill videos of it and see how much recoil it has.
>>65307208Did you miss the point where it was already fired?They reloaded it with some mystery round.
>>65307197A reloadable version of the Alcotan?
>>65307096>What part of recoilless is hard to comprehendas an esl i have to ask: does "less" in this case mean zero as in null or does it mean "less" as in comparatively less as in it has recoil but less recoil than an ordinary gun. there is a pretty big difference in meaning here and the english language isnt clear about it at all.
>>65306868>Arabic-derived Islamic term referring to a man who is permissive or apathetic regarding unchaste, adulterous, or immodest behavior by his wife or female relatives>Make me look it upMind your own business.
>>65307290The former.
>>65307290There is negligible recoil in a carl gustav, that's why it causes so much concussive, brain damaging, waterfall nosebleed giving, punch drunk ass backblast
>>65307263>Go watch one of the 647,545 fire drill videos of it and see how much recoil it has.it doesnt seem to be consistent, sometimes none at all and sometimes the guy is visibly being rocked. its probably a technical issue, if the back blast doesnt have exactly the same power as the front blast you will have recoil, so a little manufacturing fuckup is enough and suddenly you have a pretty wild tube in your hands. i dont trust these "recoilless" guns at all.
>>65307257You need a shoulder stop so that you can make the sight usable and also not slip when carrying it, ya dingus.
>>65307297I just thought he was concerned about da' youth.
>>65307329>it doesnt seem to be consistent, sometimes none at all and sometimes the guy is visibly being rocked. its probably a technical issuedifferent rounds?>i dont trust these "recoilless" guns at allIsn't the Carl Gustaf one of the longest served pieces of man portable AT?
>>65306768slight lel
>>65307386It's utes. Da utes.
>>65307312>so much concussive, brain damaging, waterfall nosebleed giving,this is false, the only thing that happened to me was that my dick got hard
>>65307329>sometimes none at all and sometimes the guy is visibly being rockedthey are shitily trained and flinchi've seen a guy point the barrel 50 degrees into air after pulling the trigger.
>>65307092Just far enough to pomf =3
>>65307208Looks like I get to post this again.
>>65307574>ear pro worn wrong>no strap>barely holding on to the damn thingComedy gold.
>>65307471
>>65307297correct, its a based term>>65306975the later, like you
>>65307329based cautionary man who doesn't trust bullshit "technology"
>>65307471>>65307650>Swedish solider is named Torsten Stålnacke>His name literally means Thor-stone (the) Steel-Neck/Chin>gets his jaw blown off in combat, casually keeps keeps fighting like it's no big dealWhat kind of hack fraud wrote this shit!!?!
>>65307471Den hårdaste jäveln.
>>65307574The perfidious swedes don't want you to know this, but all AT-4s are equipped with a rudimentary AI that can detect when the weapon is being handled by a russian.This feature will cause the weapon to malfunction in a dangerous fashion and maim or kill the russian operator.That's how much the swedes hate muscovites.That's why there are several videos of russians getting fucked up by these things, while the weapon has a respectable safety record in the west.
>>65307208>>65307574This is the power of real Global South BRICS Third Worldism.
>>65306775
If you think the Gustaf's backblast is bad, the very first recoilless guns blasted a bunch of grease and buckshot equal to the projectile weight out the back as a counterweight. You sure as fuck wouldn't want to be anywhere near that.
>>65307471what a chad>>65306768masterful bait OP, but everyone already knew /k/ was full of deviants and perverts
>>65308001>was about to umm ackshually its vents>look up Davis gun>it did just shoot backwards at the same timeWhat the fuck
>>65306775Hate pedos but that's actually funny lol>>65306801Allegedly the SMAW had these special indoor rockets with gel packs on the back end. Only came in the regular HE variant??? Fuck I've almost been out 10 years. But yeah there was a little development on that front in the GWOT but so long as anti armor weapons don't see heavy use and the goys are expendable, there's probably not going to be much more.
>>65306768Your hearing loss is not service related.
>>65308338To be fair you have to be retarded to end up being issued one>t. volunteered to be one
>>65308001I've seen another cutaway where one had a stack big flat metal washers packed in grease. I guess those would probably lose velocity pretty fast compared to round balls.
>>65306768Shot it 3 times in under 3 minutes and was the AG for 6 more at a range once and I felt mentally fucking retarded for the rest of the day. Useful weapon but it absolutely fucks users up over time.
>>65308138people in the past were retarded
We also need to find a way to deal with the shockwave that travels directly to the side of the head and neck from the launcher tube, which momentarily expands upon firing.
>>65308448Wouldn't that just be a compressible sleeve?
>>65306768I’ll take one of each
>>65308426Just made you feel what you are, then? I see no issue with this.
>>65306775Spbp
>>65307290The first. That’s a good question even for an English speaker. It’s meant to mean “no recoil” even though some of them do have a bit of recoil. The recoil is negligible compared to the amount of force going out.
>>65306775Nicely done.
Reading the wiki article about recoilless rifles and this stuck out to me.>The British, whose efforts were led by Charles Dennistoun Burney, inventor of the Wallbuster HESH round, also developed recoilless designs. >Burney demonstrated the technique with a recoilless 4-gauge shotgun. >His "Burney Gun" was developed to fire the Wallbuster shell against the Atlantic Wall defences, but was not required in the D-Day landings of 1944. I really want to see that recoilless shotgun,
>>65306768Essentially a shoulder-fired cannon and far more effective than you'd think for something of its age. Versatility is its true strength, with rounds for every occasion. It is THE Problem Solver.
>>65308668>4gauge>recoilless>hesh>shotgunGIB
>>65306772>>65306775this is a samefag you retards
>>65308734ummm?
>>65308734idiot>>65306775disgusting
>>65308579you're on 4chan so i assume your dick can't get hard without brain damage
>>65307471Blood for the bood god
>>65308001Counter charges is one way to reign in most of the backblast on recoilless guns.Grease and buckshot would function, but the big drawback is that your backblast is now a canister shot, that's a fat goddamn swarm of deadly projectiles with far range, so it's a different kind of safety hazard to mind. Stacked metal discs would be better in the sense of air resistance and sectional density working against them, but they're still metal projectiles.On the Panzerfaust 3, this countercharge was a brick of densely compressed plastic chips, where they would absorb most of the backblast so that you could fire it indoors without issue. The plastic chips are fragile and very light in weight, so they don't make for very far reaching projectiles.As mentioned earlier, there are modern variants of the M72 and AT4 which use measures of saline for the same effect, and this also works, the so called "Confined Space" variants. Probably more environmentally friendly than the plastic chips, and probably even safer, but probably also not as lightweight.On the insane genius end, the Irish Republican Army devised an improvised recoilless rifle, where they used two packages of Digestive biscuits as the countercharge, and that shit genuinely fucking worked, no joke. Extremely British of them.All of this safety is in the relative sense, if you're an inch away from the recoilless rifle's venturi, you're gonna have a very bad time anyway, even with the saline, but it reduces your backblast area to just a fraction of normal.>>65308138Not even the first to do this. IIRC someone demonstrated a cannon to the Founding Fathers, which you'd hoist over your shoulder and fire standing, and indeed it was recoilless, which it achieved by plain firing a second cannonball the other direction.They were, understandably, not best impressed by this idea, hence why it remains a historical footnote.
>>65309308>, and indeed it was recoilless, which it achieved by plain firing a second cannonball the other direction.>They were, understandably, not best impressed by this idea,i assume this is where "Clear backblast" was invented?
>>65309321You still need to clear for backblast with something without a countercharge, even a weapon on the lighter end, like the M72, will have enough energy to pulp your internal organs if you stand close behind it.On something particularly hefty, like the old M47 Dragon, that backblast is absolutely thundering.
>>65309308>>65309341Just read up on one of the German WW2 recoilless rifles and it seems they experienced the same issue. Gun rattled its carriage to pieces within 300 shots.Other solutions to the issue are what the Poles did with their one-shot rocket launcher that just pinwheels exhaust flames in front of the user and that french concept launcher that uses recoil mitigation, but pays for it with about half the effective range of the Carl.
I don't actually know much about shoulder launchers - do more conventional rocket launchers also cause brain damage, or just recoilless rifles?
>>65309341>M47 Dragonfamed for steering by its backblast, remember?is feature not bug
>>65309321I'm assuming the inventor had worked that out before demonstrating it.>>65309390>Other solutions to the issue are what the Poles did with their one-shot rocket launcher that just pinwheels exhaust flames in front of the user The RPG76 Komar. This actually works fairly well, as long as you grip it correctly, as it instructs you to, though this creates a 'sideblast' area you need to mind.Polish participants in Iraq brought those old things with them, and found that they were in fact still pretty useful, because it was a lightweight (and foldable) rocket launcher you could very safely fire from out the door of a building or vehicle. It was ok that it wasn't stronk enough for cutting edge battle tanks, because you'd blow up all kinds of other things with them instead, which is the same reason why old M72s are still being made and used.
Was there a significant advantage to utilizing the recoilless gun principle rather than relying entirely on rockets for propulsion?
>>65307447>Isn't the Carl Gustaf one of the longest served pieces of man portable AT?Yes, since 1948 to be specific, soon 80 years.
I can't find any videos of the ADM401 in action. guess they were never widely made or used?
>>65309415You can generally launch a larger projectile for any given weight of a launch system, and rocket launchers either need a separate launching charge (like RPGs) or a large and bulky face shield to not get facefucked by the rocket motor (Like a Panzerschreck or Bazooka)
>>65309419Also, the very first version of the Garl Gustaf, the Model 1, weighed a whopping 30lbs, while the modern Model 4 version is down to 15lbs.
>>65309426The initial solution to the Panzerschreck was even more inconvenient, because it had no shield at all, the user simply had to don a gasmask, gloves, and protective coat so that the rocket exhaust wouldn't cook them like a bratwurst.The blast shield and its aiming windows (which you'd have to replace periodically), was genuinely a million times more elegant and easy to use. Much better than having to stop to suit up (or, if your pals lives were on the line and it was a matter of seconds, sacrificing yourself for them, which would be extremely noble of you, but not exactly practical).Thus, I can't hate on the blast shield or call it too awkward or bulky.
>>65309440The Panzerfaust was their best development on that point. Had very short range at first, which meant having to have a lot of balls to dare to use it on a tank (a bulletproof death machine with a cannon and virtually infinite machineguns), but range improved as they iterated on them.You can see how good this was in how the final developments of the WW2 Panzerfaust, which while not getting to really see any field use because of how late in the war it was, got yoinked by the Russians who say the value in it, and was then developed from that into their RPG2.
>>65309432We still use the m/48 M1 in the Swedish Homeguard. They will be replaced by M4s next year tho, thank god.
>>65309440>Thus, I can't hate on the blast shield or call it too awkward or bulky.Agreed, it was a good solution for the Panzerschreck, but with a recoilless rifle that whole issue is eliminated compleatly.
>>65309448Fan, verkligen? Antar att dem var byggda för att hålla med tanke hur tunga dem var.
>>65309454Jo, skiten är hållbar som fasen, men dryg att konka runt på. Riktmedlen blir också betydligt bättre när vi byter till M4.
However, it appears that the bulky blast shields originally used on both the Bazooka and the Panzerschreck fell out of use.
>>65309463
>>65309405No, completely different. It used a charge to launch the missile, and then this wire-guided missile had arrays of about 30 pairs of small thrusters lining its sides, which were used to both keep the missile airborne, and to steer it towards its target at the same time, which the shooter would do by continuing to guide it through the sight.So called SACLOS: Semi-Automatic Command to Line Of Sight.These little thrusters would fire off repeatedly over its path of travel, going POW each time, which earned the M47 the nickname of "Popcorn Missile."This actually functions, but it's EXTREMELY awkward, and the M47 was notoriously difficult to actually use properly, because not only did you need to have perfect fucking followthrough, as the big and heavy missile was no longer on your shoulder and you were now only holding up the light fiberglass tube, DON'T FLINCH WHEN THAT HAPPENS, but also because the missile was difficult to just steer.Keeping it properly airborne was tricky, and if you accidentally aimed the reticle at the missile itself, it got confused and would crash immediately, you had to kinda perfectly walk it onto target.The M47 Dragon was known to miss 80% of the time, which combined with its hefty weight and bulk, and the fact that it took its long and sweet time to get on target (loudly going POW-POW-POW-POW all the way, announcing its arrival), made it not particularly well liked by American soldiers.The M72 wasn't even close to as powerful or far reaching, but it was very light and easy to carry, and extremely easy to use and hit with, so it was virtually always preferred.
>>65307523How much exaggerating are you going to do anon? Like it ain't good for you, but the only times I have heard of it doing anything like that was from a dude who pumped through 20 rounds during one firefight in Afghanistan. During qualification I was gunner on two rounds and assistant on two. Leaves your brain a little wonky, I wouldn't want to do live fire on the regular. But come on, it's not like it instantly turns you into a potato.
>>65309397The rattling apparently is caused by the projectile engaging with the rifling, so pure rocket launchers should not suffer it.
>>65309515Are you disputing the hardness of anon's dick?
>>65309515>I wouldn't want to do live fire on the regulari do. there were guys who didnt want to shoot it during their reserve ex so i did it for themim fucking addicted to the thing, specialy that metallic *CLING* part
>>65309478Why did they make it so retardedly convoluted, compared to its Soviet counterparts like Fagot and Konkurs?
>>65306768
>>65309574I really couldn't tell you why.
>>65306768old ass weapon which is still in use, dont mess with perfection.also firing it too much tears out the lining of your lungs or something
>>65307290>and the english language isnt clear about it at all.im pretty sure it's always the former when its being used as a suffix
>>65307290zeroit has nothing to do with the English languageas >>65311176 wisely said, the only grammatical aspect of this is that>This weapon is recoillessis meant to imply zero recoil, while>This weapon is less-lethalis meant to imply it can still be deadlyThis is not a stupid question, since a lot of fucking retards (such as journalists, politicians and liberals) don't seem to understand the distinction and complain whenever a less-lethal weapon kills somebody.
>>65309548On no. The thing is boner fuel.
>>65308803It’s weird you’re thinking about how other men can’t get hard. Also don’t see how that applies to what I said, but clearly you’re a sodomite so I don’t expect logic.
>>65306984>BTW, my experts say stuff like hearing and brain damage is 95% "delayed",It takes about 2 weeks for a damaged neuron to die, so yes. It takes even longer for long term plaque build up from brain shock, meaning that lots of military related TBI goes undiagnosed and uncompensated because it happened after discharge. TBI is not an on/off binary condition, it occurs on a scale, and even subclinical TBI is crippling in subtle ways. In America law enforcement prefers to hire ex military, this is a serious problem because too many of these have gotten their brains scrambled and cant really be trusted with guns any more. I dont know if any of you remembers that acorns falling on a police cruiser incident, but that was certainly subclinical TBI in practice.
>>65309397>I don't actually know much about shoulder launchers - do more conventional rocket launchers also cause brain damage, or just recoilless rifles?No they should not, recoilless rifles have much higher muzzle and backblast pressures. Its the double slap from these that causes TBI. One benefit of rocket launchers is that their firing signature is much lower. While the rocket works as a giant tracer revealing the direction of the shooter, recoilless rifles pinpoint the shooters position, he is right in between the muzzle blast and the back blast.
>>65309415>Was there a significant advantage to utilizing the recoilless gun principle rather than relying entirely on rockets for propulsion?Yes they are more accurate. This can be somewhat compensated for when you make a rocket launcher by making it somewhat of a hybrid system.
>>65309447>The Panzerfaust was their best development on that point. Had very short range at first, which meant having to have a lot of balls to dare to use it on a tank (a bulletproof death machine with a cannon and virtually infinite machineguns), but range improved as they iterated on them.The panzerfaust was a massive improvement over clamping a held magnetic charge to a tank or chucking a satchel charge on the deck of a tank which was the previous state of the art methods. The fuze on a panzerfaust went live after 5 meters of flight. The warhead would penetrate 200 mm of RHA. Western AT weapons have absurdly long safety distances before the fuze arms, for an AT-4 its 30 meters, I saw a video of a russian tank survive an ambush in kursk, the ukie got in a perfect shot that would have ignited the ammo carousel but he fired from 20 meters range so the fuze never activated and the russian kept driving away fully buttoned up and completely oblivious.I saw another infamous videos of ukies fring a NLAW from the 3rd floor of a house onto the top of a T-72, the fuze never activated and the rocket hit the 12.7 mm HMG and then bounced off the top of the turret. In both cases, had they used a fossile panzerfaust 100, they would have gotten a kill.
>>65312440>i saw a rifle miss from close range if they had a pistol they would have hit this is proof that pistols are the preferred primary infantry weapon
>>65309454>Fan, verkligen? Antar att dem var byggda för att hålla med tanke hur tunga dem var.>>65309457>Jo, skiten är hållbar som fasen, men dryg att konka runt på. Riktmedlen blir också betydligt bättre när vi byter till M4.På den tiden fanns det inte några moderna kompositmaterial och höghållfasthetsstål var inte lika starka som idag. Använder ni C-G med fulltrycksammunition så föreslår jag att ni barlastar era hjälmar och skaffar nackstöd som lyfter hjälmen. Barlasten bör placeras på toppen av hjälmen för bästa effekt. Extra massa är det enda enkla sättet att reducera den acceleration som era huvuden utsätts för när ni rammas av tryckvågorna från mynning och bakblås. Era huvuden kan matematiskt modelleras som en vikt på en arm (nacken) som gungar fram och tillbaka efter kortvariga men kraftiga smällar fram och bakifrån från tryckvågorna efter avfyring. Kom ihåg, F=MA, ska ni räkna på effekten av extra massa, så måste ni inkludera hela huvudet, och ni måste också ta hänsyn till momentarmarna för skalle, hjälm och extra vikter. Det var årtionden sedan jag studerade hållfasthetslära, men det här är relativt enkelt att modellera. Nackstödet är till för att rädda era nackdiskar från den extra vikten så ni inte får bråck. En tekniskt fullvärdig lösning skulle vara någon sorts hjälm med ansiktssköld som vilar på axlarna och tar upp kraften från tryckvågorna så att skallen inte utsätts för hälsovådlig acceleration. Traumatisk hjärnskada är inte att leka med, blir du diagnosticerad med det så kommer körkortet att ryka direkt ovanpå alla andra problem som du kommer att ha.
>>65312489>>i saw a rifle miss from close range if they had a pistol they would have hit this is proof that pistols are the preferred primary infantry weaponThey didnt miss, you idiot. They scored perfect hits which were worth nothing because the fuze had still not traveled the far too long minimum safe distance.
>>65312518>i don't understand analogies unless they're exactly the same
>>65312440Yea, 30 m is excessive. I remember a clip from Mariupol, a soldier shot something (can't remember whether it was an NLAW or an AT4) from a window into a tank running below, and it just landed smoldering in the back of the turret. I think 15 meters is enough.
>>65312571>Yea, 30 m is excessive. I remember a clip from Mariupol, a soldier shot something (can't remember whether it was an NLAW or an AT4) from a window into a tank running below, and it just landed smoldering in the back of the turret. I think 15 meters is enough.IIRC AT-4 is 30 meters and NLAW is 20 meters. 15 meters is too much, half of that would be acceptable. Ideally it should be adjustable by the end user for close range shots in urban terrain. Panzerfaust 5 meters arming distance was 5 meters for a reason.
>>65307221No recoilless weapon is "fully recoilless". They all have some pretty significant recoil even if most of the kinetic energy goes out the back.
>>65312614>They all have some pretty significant recoil
>>65312571>>65312440>samefagging this hard
>>65306768Cute
>>65306768If you are sexually attracted to this girl, particularly her legs, you are a monster that belongs in prison.
>>65312783And also her hips, waist and that curvature around her backside. It's disgusting that sick pedos find that appealing. I hope they get the help they need.
>>65312791yes if you are attracted to flat chests with budding breasts you should be institutionalized
>>65312508Just how much does it help with weapons and munitions using stuff like saline countercharges? Not enough difference to make a difference for onset of CTE, or the effect is just offset by reducing blast in the rear while leaving it unchanged at the front?I kind of understand why the U.S Army straight up do not let you shoot more than a set number of shots a year with theirs in training. I can only imagine how much mush your brain would actually become if you found yourself blasting off half a dozen a week doing a tour in a total war.
>>65309477lol'd
>>65309624I appreciate the classic style meme.
>>65314231Don't care. Still would ravage her like a french gentleman in the 1800's.
>>65317552Reminds me that De Sade almost got Isekai'd while saving a loli from carriage-kun.
>>65306768a year ago i got a month long vacation for posting that pic. now the thread is still up. jannies are two faced niggers that belong to the sewers.
>>65306801PIAT mk2
>>65306768hey anon next time do a better job on hiding the site you got this from aka the white part bottom right
>>6530677521?
>>65317781What?
>>65317776The French built it, the Japanese also dicked around with the idea. Half the effective range of the Carl, not worth it.
>>65318398No, I don't, but I guess good on you for being honest about being a burgeoning predator.
>>65318398sounds like I'd be put on a list for even googling that
>>65318428I'm confident that anon is already on a few specific lists for various related reasons, given that he's familiar with such a website, and knew that the OP pic was sourced from there.
>>65317552When will ESLs learn the difference between ravage and ravish?
>>65318530they're synonyms, retardyou've just been exposed to more colloquial uses of the word "ravish" so you think it means what you think it does, but you're not learned enough to know that "ravage" was also commonly used in the exact same way
The ghost of Epstein made this thread
did a pedo point out a pedo site?
>>65317781I have that picture with the uncovered watermark and I got it from 4chan, you retard. The fact you're triggered and knowing of it leans implication to YOU, not the OP.
You dont even need underground sites for that now, its all mainstream! Sites like Vinted is the place to go.
>>65306768>Opinions on the Carl Gustaf?It gives you permanent brain damage if you actually need to use it in a serious situation. Not recommended for real warfare if you value the minds of your soldiers.Very recommended if you doN't though, it's pretty effective.
>>65318733They're not synonyms and you only think they are because you've seen them misused so often. Unless he meant that he wanted to brutally murder her, ravish is the correct word.
>>65318733>>65319100NTA, however:>like a french gentleman in the 1800'sMakes the murder theory a lot more likely.
>>65319100Right, so you think>My dear, you look ravishingmeans she looks like she's about to rape you, is it?also,>And they'll both ravage her by and byyou don't know the Clone Song? Fuck off.>>65319119both words, and even "ravene", are all from the same root word meaning to pillage or plunder. so does "rape", which is why rape was often used in antiquity to mean plunder as well as forced sex. While that meaning of "rape" has more or less become ensconced as the primary meaning, both "ravish" and "ravage" are used interchangeably to mean general assault still, often in a humorous way.
>>65319146Ravish means to carry or sweep away by force, which can imply either physical force or force of personality depending on the context, with 'ravishing' being an example of the latter. Ravage means to devastate or destroy. Assuming anon wanted to have sex with her and not dismember her, ravish is the correct word.
>>65306768when in doubt, get karlonly complaint I ever heard about the gusti from its users is that they didn't get shoot it enough
>>65319080You can get a Twitter account and pay Elon for access to his CP machine.Remember to alternately pay with VISA and Mastercard.
>>65319171>Ravish means to carry or sweep away by force>Ravage means to devastate or destroyand also to carry off, both words mean the same as "plunder"for example:>The guerrillas had repeatedly ravaged the place, and whatever furniture they could not carry off, they took good care to break.Obviously this sentence uses the word "ravage" to mean plunder; otherwise it makes no sense."ravaged" is also used specifically to refer to fields of crops, because most of the time in antiquity, armies fed off the enemy's fields.>Michiella can enter Camilla's blue-room, and ravage her caskets for treasonable correspondence.to desttroy? or to carry off?>Lorraine was also sorry for Josie and she let her ravage her sugar barrel and pile on to her best chaise longue to lie and pout and eat candy...to destroy sugar? or consume it?as for rape,>It said nothing when they stole Red Fawn from her father's tepee and ravaged her to death. It has said: 'Give us proof that Thoreau killed Reville, and that his wife did not die a natural death.' We are our own law. In these forests we are masters. And yet with this brothel at our doors we are not safe, our wives and daughters are within the reach of monsters. To-day it is my daughter—her husband's wife.What do you think "ravaged" meant in this sense?
>>65319227>the place>the caskets>the sugar barrelIn each of these cases it's the container that's being described as ravaged, their previous orderly state ruined and destroyed. Ransacked (to search roughly, causing disarray) would be a better synonym here than plundered (to take by force), as in all three cases the focus is on the resulting damage rather than the act of taking itself.>Red FawnWas murdered. Damage to her body caused her death, not being carried or swept away.
>>65318214>what a cute little launcher >see pic related damn she HUGE
>>65319420Here's the Japanese attempt at the thing, but it apparently went nowhere because the army started dicking around with the concept before parliament had given them the go-ahead.Which they didn't like cause last time the army got to dick around as it pleased, lots of grannies got slathered in napalm and nuclear fire.
>>65319044still a pedophile
>>65319098>It gives you permanent brain damage if you actually need to use it in a serious situation. Firing one or two shots to take out a tank won't pulp your brains, retard.
>>65318214Isn't this the thing from that one gif where it chucks the empty case out the back and the recoil nearly knocks the guy down?
>>65306768>>65306772That picture is so old, she can see the wall approaching now.>>65307297Thanks, anon. No idea what that meant either.
>>65307661Nothing about Islam is based, it's a religion for inbred and degenerate throwbacks.
>>65319913You just sound insecure
>>65320016Got him
>>65319870She's long past it unless the picture is only 3 or 4 years old.
>>65321488The pic is from at least 2019. If we assume it was taken then, then she probably turned legal recently or will be soon...
>>65321493Like I said, long past the wall.
>>65321493Protip: the age of consent in Lithuania is 16
>>65306927>Wonder what that would do to longevity of its users.Hate to break it to you, but it eventually caught up to Mack.
>>65306849Why are the Bagdonas Brothers arming little girls? I thought they would be on team Epstein.
>>65321493All we really know for sure is that she's fat now.
>>65322123the cutest thing I've ever seen was an excited little kid asking for more ammo while perfectly adhering to the rules of firearm safety
>>65317754Duh
>>65306768Great weapon.Fired many rounds from it in my time in the CAF.It does what it needs to do.
>>65306927engh I fired 8 rounds then loaded 8 rounds, i prob have a tbi from it lol
>>65322123This pic is so old. The girl must be like 20 now
>>65312623If only someone will make the same video with modern systems to settle the recoiless argument once and for all.
>>65306768I have some experience with the m2 version and VERY limited experience with the m3 and m4. What I can tell you is, it's pretty large, heavy and sucks to carry but it's incredibly versatile and easy to use. Size and weight are really the main drawbacks, especially if you're the assistant gunner, that ammo fucking sucks to carry, even more so if you only have your regular pack and not one of those specially made ones that have slots for the grenades
>>65312783>>65312791>>65317552Gentleman. >>65317552Degenerate
>>65306772I would guess 12, maybe early 13.
What about a recoilmore rifle?
>>65307574That front grip is not a suggestion.
>>65325283>>65323523>>65319194>>65312508
Is shit compared to the 95 S 58-61 Musti (Blackie). Penetrates 560mm of RHA and had an ERA block penetrating hardened penetrator on the tip. Also had wheels for a casual stroll in the woods. You can mount it on a GAZ or a XA-180 if you to.
>>65325444>recoilmore riflethat's called a jet engine
>>65306768Don't think that I don't know what was in that lower right corner.
>>65318530>>65319100I 100% mean ravage, as in violently destroy.
>>65326351well, mind explaining how would you know that?
>>65326351We used to be a real country
King of the Recoilless Guns
>>65326351
