[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: jipsdcoipjdsw.jpg (29 KB, 600x400)
29 KB JPG
why arent low cost close range AT weapon made anymore?
>>
>>65324176
They are
>>
File: e-f-ps-001.jpg (1.13 MB, 1500x1500)
1.13 MB JPG
>>65324176
Its called a remote-EFP, nowadays Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) made them on any given day with almost zero funds just by sticking some explosive behind a guardrail.
Detonated by a farmer in a bush for a fraction of a dollar.

That shit would cut right through any IFV or APC the occupiers were fielding and render MBTs immobile in a single hit.
>>
File: PSX_20260712_144627.jpg (130 KB, 548x364)
130 KB JPG
???
>>
>>65324200
Ive seen russian dropped off by btr with just a rifle and the ukranian drove a tank 50mt from em.
>>
>>65324213
russians are retarded and unequipped
>>
>>65324176
What the fuck are you goddamn talking about you fucking retard? They never ever stopped making them.
The first Panzerfausts had 30m of range, which is retard close, hence it was upped to 60m relatively soon, and eventually twice that, because nobody wants to get within 60m of an enemy tank if they can ever help it, let alone 30m.
>>
>>65324176
>why arent low cost close range AT weapon made anymore?
>>
what do you think the AT4 is?
>>
>>65324176
Because being far away from the tank is vastly preferable to being close to it.
>>
>>65324955
Maybe the tank just wants a hug?
>>
>>65324204
This shit is terrifying
>>
File: 130209-F-WU507-006.jpg (226 KB, 1200x900)
226 KB JPG
>>65324204
>>65326038
Friend of mine went on two tours in Afghanistan and his units job was to patrol and secure the perimeter around a very busy and important NATO-Airbase.
Meaning they would ride around and check all the settlements, roads, hillsides, and even specific patches of foliage in a radius of up to 10-15 kilometers from the base to make sure nothing threatening ever came into mortar of ATGM range of the airbase.

He said EFPs were the single most scary thing, because they were often harder to spot and disable than conventional road-side bombs and some of them used optical triggers, others were remotely operated. They caused more death and destruction in the ranks of the coalition forces than all of the other weapons al-qaeda fielded against them combined.
>>
>>65325961
No means no!
>>
>>65324176
Most estimates put a kamikaze FPV at around $400, or double that if it uses fiber optics. For something that can be launched from ten miles away and doesn't require line of sight, it's hard to do better than that.
>>
>>65324176
>low cost
MIC's gotta make their money somehow
>>
>>65327148
The MIC can make good money on things like bulk sales of modernized and relatively inexpensive M72 LAWs, it's the 66mm version of being contracted to produce small arms ammunition, which is a teat that the military will suckle on for a good and long time, because they need that sweet milk you've got.

Say, anyone get thirsty just now?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.