Imagine Starlink has secretly high resolution cameras on every single device.They could see the entire earth in real time without any gaps.Send all the images to a huge datacenter, and they could monitor with AI where each ship or aircraft is in real time.There would be no need for radars. Totally doable now.Submarines are the future.
>>65333700no.
>>65333700NoSmall camera =/= good spy camera Your fanciful ideas of subterfuge makes no sense to the bottom line for a multi billion dollar company
>Submarines are the future.your post is stupid for a lot of reasons but this is probably the funniest part
>>65333700this is retarded. please leave.
>>65333700I'll take a quart of general tso's
Are satelites the new current thing in military enthusiast circles that are supposed to make everything obsolete now that everyone is tired of the drone craze?
>>65333700Pete, it's early for a drink.
Starshield sats (they're actually different from Starlink ones) supposedly do have cameras, exactly for this purpose. Obviously we have no fucking clue what kind they really are because we've never seen Starshield sats, but they're publicly said that they are on them, among other sensing equipment.
>>65333700I agree.With the help of cameras and massive ai data centers everywhere, every human's every move is logged. No more revolutions, no more intrigue.
Peak retard, camera resolution is physically limited by lens size, there is a reason hubble was designed to point down.
>>65333700I really wish there was a fucking english/IQ test before you were allowed to post.
OP is right.Aircraft carriers are big as fuck, thus it is not needed a microscope to find a carrier.And for airplanes they can use this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFiubdrJqqITrack every single fast moving object.Exclude the commercial airliners that release public information of its location and flight path.You can track only the unidentified objects easily.
>>65333969>thus it is not needed a microscopeJesus christ
>>65333969>find a carrierthe problem is more so getting a killchain to destroy the carrier. getting a still frame image of it and then launching ballistic missiles based on that is not enough, it only takes 3 minutes for a US supercarrier to do a full U-turn.
>>65333969>thus it is not needed a microscope to find a carrierspeak English you brown fuck
>>65333700No but the images captured by existing military satellites are processed much more quickly because LLMs are good at recognising patterns.
>>65333700Why bother with cameras when you can use radio waves?
>>65333969>thus it is not needed a microscopeMaybe this poster is needed an english lesson.
