[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.65337188
File: 1783856245837270.png (786 KB, 1848x950)
786 KB PNG
 No.65337188 Archived
>fussion reactor gets small enough it can be put in a jet
>Its reliable and safe enough it wont explode the pilot if hit
>Electricity its produces can be used to operate standard jet motor or super heat the air by passing it inside the reactor as if it was after burner
Would this offer anything to modern planes?
>>
Anonymous
 No.65337213
 No.65337213
no
>>
Anonymous
 No.65337228
 No.65337228
no
>>
Anonymous
 No.65337314
 No.65337314
no
>>
Anonymous
 No.65337349
 No.65337349
nyet
>>
Anonymous
 No.65337377
 No.65337377
File: elder turbojet.jpg (121 KB, 1068x732)
121 KB JPG
>>65337188
We need room-temperature/high-H_c superconductors to make really compact fusion reactors you could cram into a fighter.
Otherwise they need lots of cooling machinery, large vacuum vessels and so on, which makes fission reactors win in density.

>fussion
Finish school before asking engineering questions.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.