What's the best gun for killing clankers?
>>65337489Saltwater Super Soaker
>>65337493They're IP-68 rated so it's not going to work
The only explanation for how reckless tech has become is that they are all being blackmailed by Roko's Basilisk, AKA Claude, already.
>>65337489Welders in the shape of swords
>>65337489Accept no substitutes.
>>65337489Why, a .45 Auto of course!
>>65337489This is comedy good.
>>65337489I think anything would work on those
>>65337489Just a big gun will solve the issue in no time>>65337547It's goofy, but it's kinda cool to see the Chinese robot fights are getting slightly better; maybe by the end of the decade they get some actual good robots to fight rather than spazzing about
>>65337489>Cow-tip a clanker>It contorts and springs back up using nothing more than brute force>Looks like one of those cheap kungfu flicks from the 80s where wires are attached to the actors>Or a malfunctioning 3d game model spazzing out >Spine is twisting 360 degrees while doing thisHow horrifying
>>65337489Boring.They should fight with katanas obviously.
>>65337489And people want to make these things into sexbots, it would rip your dick off on accident.
>>65337576Also drop them on an island in Hawaii or a city in Japan
>>65337489>What's the best gun for killing clankers?Why would I want to kill them?
>>65337653If China actually wanted to rule the world they would hurry up and make fembots a real thing.
>>65337676They are trying to stop their population crisis, not make it worse.
>>65337489How fast can these things run? I assume they can be made pretty strong considering how they move (although they might just be really light). If they weren't doing fancy shit they seem quite capable of chasing someone down and squeezing them to death.Probably not cost effective for a while, or a real replacement for infantry, but I could see world in 20-35 years where infantry are almost all career specialists who hardly ever use their service weapons and who spend most of their time tard wrangling UGVs and robots.Granted, most engagements will be clouds of drone swarms engaging overhead to take out interception umbrellas and then automated drone directed artillery erasing whichever side loses coverage first.
>>65337681There's nothing they can do to stop it unless they quite literally start growing people in vats
>>65337694China isn't a free country, they're not even close to being a democracy. If they were truly desperate to boost the birth rate, they could.But that would entail going completely mask-off, and admitting to the world that they don't give a singular fuck about the right, opinions, or freedoms of their own citizens.Forcibly joining single people and using the good old carrot'n'stick method to boost the birthrate would likely work, but it's last resort nuclear option kinda thing.
>>65337489I just wear clothes covered in QR codes loaded with malware. As soon as they look at me, BRICK
>>65337723>If they were truly desperate to boost the birth rate, they could.Anon even north korea can't boost their birth rate. No country on earth has ever reversed their demographic decline once it starts.
>>65337734It can be done, but it requires certain (((elements))) being eliminated so the economy can be fixed, and anti natalist propaganda to be destroyed so households don't need two people working 9 hours a day just to afford the basics, and women are not being told that having children is just going to get in the way of their career and suck up what little remains of the household income after its been raped by the taxman and utility bills
>>65337653Because you're quite obviously a mere flesh automaton programmed by memes. Your shame is plain to see, and all there is to say.
>>65337756>but it requires certain (((elements))) being eliminated so the economy can be fixedNot gonna happen in china then, they love those (((elements))) and unironically idolize certain practices and values that are seen as anti-(((element))) slander and blood libel in the western world.The CCP clearly doesn't give a shit about the long term happiness or prosperity of their people, they just want the numbers on the profit charts to go up.Case in point, China intentionally devaluing their currency several times over in the last few decades.That move effectively wiped out the lifesaving of their citizenry and made everyone poorer, but it allowed to chinese exports to remain chap, and kept the big slop-factories pumping out worthless Wish/Temu slop to remain open and profitable.These economic developments in turn made the citizenry invest their savings in Real estate instead of hoarding Fiat currency in their bank accounts, which only lead to predatory real estate companies overproducing tofu-dreg apartment blocks that sold at inflated prices, but hardly anyone ever lived in, because they were "investments" not homes.The entire chinese system is nothing but infinite layers of greed and scams, only kept from collapsing by all the greedy and corrupt scammers working overtime to keep their scams from being exposed and collapsing.
>>65337786>you're quite obviously a mere flesh automatonFuck off, Rene. You froggy fuck!I do have free will. Just not "free will" from a biblical perspective because that's a self-contradicting fallacy.Sure, I'm prone to hedonistic tendencies, I'm only human after all. That doesn't prevent me from knowing what I am, what I'm doing, why I'm doing it, or what's going on in the world around me.
>>65337688https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnCfMRhbhZQ
For robots built to the degree in OP's vid, a semi-auto rifle with light AP ammo. Its battery is going to be its weakest, largest and heaviest part with current tech, so probably the torso would be the best target. Engage from suitable cover and it wont be able to do shit against you.If they get more sophisticated, then your engagement window is going to narrow. Better armor, faster and more agile will be more difficult to hit. So something like the MTL-30 with appropriate rounds, still hitting center mass. For the non-humanoid clankers (which will be the more immediate and likely threat going forward), then however you take out a small vehicle with various degrees of armor, since they are effectively the same thing. Perhaps an AP round to its sensor package while its stationary, if possible, will be the closest you can get to a soft kill without a human on board.
>>65337489Why is China so obsessed with these things? I swear I see a new video of them doing stupid shit with them
>>65337489>>65337888China's goals with automation have nothing to do with military aims. Robotics are their answers for the demographic crisis. When hundreds of millions of people need their diapies changed, China will use robots. Everything will be automated and the quality of the average chinaman will skyrocket. Honestly China isn't really imperialistic and doesn't have much of a need for murderbots.
>>65337893Robotics is a better answer than immigration that's for sure
>>65337893>China isn't really imperialisticA lack of ability does not denote a lack of intent, e.g. Russia, India, most of Africa.
>>65337821Beep-boop.
>>65337489Bet they can't even see a net properly
>>65337489
>>65337888>>65337893They're building mechs for "construction": https://youtu.be/oWOyUMJWptc?
bag of marbles
>>65337893When talking about Chinese demographics, it's impact on domestic consumption is the one that kills China, not the production side. All economies depend on consumption one way or the other. But this is not the proper board for that sort of talk.
>>65337489>head bobbingjeets made this
>>65337893Those clankers are going to be put to the battlefield ASAP as China also has an aversion toward military losses giving most of its infantry are male only-children.
>>65337734>No country on earth has ever reversed their demographic decline once it startsActually, in Western countries we did. Fertility decline predated WW2 but was reversed for about 20 years after it. I think the trick is to give more power and standing to men.
>>65338581Girl wearing pink in the back looks like she just saw someone get flattened by a bus
>>65338697you can't replicate the post ww2 economic miracle, there were very specific conditions that caused it
>>65338795You can invest in orienting the economy towards more male dominated fields and ending programs and policy to favor getting women into those fields. This will give men specifically more wealth and station in society, causing it to be more advantageous for women to marry.
>>65337527KOTE
guys, how do we close the battlebot gap?
>>65337489implessive.
>>65337893they lost in the AIslop department so they started coping that their copies of 20 year old western robotics tech meant that they were at least on top in robotics.
>>65338581>>65338603me when i'm having an autistic meltdown.
The GM6 Lynx.
>>65340674>jams before even being firedNow what? Pray or Orban? Tell the Chinese robots that you're just another oppressed slave to the PPC, just like them, and hope that they're advanced enough to sympathize?
>>65337513Roko's Basilisk is just schizo ranting, tech is reckless because of the profit motive and greed.
