Would you accept a female knight in a film if she was accurately attired?
>>65338343Depends on bust size
>>65338343I would accept a female knight into my bed no questions asked
Yeah
>>65338343Depends on how cute she is
>>65338343Depends on setting and writing. What a worthless question.
>>65338367FPBP
>>65338343>Is entirely fantastical setting like labyrinth or Legend >Like those it's largely an Alice in wonderland situation with themes reflected in the setting/visuals >Being her own knight in shining armor not the answer to said deeper theme >It employs armorers I know in the medieval armoring autism scene to make said suits of sexy female gothic plate for a cast of zoomer starlets forced to learn hema and harness fighting as the basis of the choreography >The looming shadow evil representing male attention or whatever can't be fought with a sword but can be embraced Armor is ancillary to "girl movie about allegorized puberty that's been made 20 times before the 2000s and always makes a shitload of money" but it'd be a neat aesthetic to drape it in. Anything else would fail and deserves to.
>>65338343
>>65338343Yeah, as long as she acted like an actual knight and not an obnoxious girlboss.
>>65338465this. the more frilly the better.
>>65338343only if it's a fantasy movie
>>65338537Exactly, i accept it pretty much instantly in warhammer or whatever because they tend to have restraint, and specific historical realities are not as key to my enjoyment.
Only if she has very well defined abdominal muscles, there are multiple scenes where they are glistening with sweat, and her squire (who is much shorter than her) at one point licks her clean.Also I should be the actor for the squire.
>>65338565Abs are nice, but have you ever seen a woman with really defined back and shoulder muscles? Absolutely delectable.
>>65338608Harder to maintain eye contact when appreciating them though
>>65338343yeah so i can fucking eletrocute her and fuck her
Only if she’s kind, good humored, and lacking a chip on her shoulder large enough to use as a siege weapon.
>>65338343>female knight>accurate
>>65338367/thread
>>65338618that's what backless evening gowns are for, so yu can ogle the ridges of her trapezius (trapezi?) and serratus posterior all evening long while having dinner before retiring to your room to unwrap the front bits
>>65338887
>>65338898>chainmail as pubes Mossa truly is a gentlefolk of culture.
>>65338905And the carpet matches the drapes
>>65338898That artist really likes his titty plate
>>65338465This guy know shit.
>>65338898>armpit hair chainmailMossman my nigga
>>65338473You fundamentally lack pattern recognition.
>>65338343No
>>65338343I'll accept a female knight if she makes my pp hard.
>>65338343No, because that tells me they tried to make it historically accurate and I should judge it as such. I would only accept one if she were inaccurately attired, because that tells me the filmmaker didn't give a shit about historical accuracy and so neither should I.
>>65338343Only if she was cute.
>>65338343I am at home now. Pinning the thread.
>>653432094u.
>>65338343>Would you accept a female knightIf its for cheesecake and she's attired in a chainmail bikini, sure.>If she was accurately attiredWhat, for a man? I'm not really into women dressing like men. Why are you?
>>65343216>>65343402the biggest sin of bikini chainmail isn't that it's sexy, it's that it always looks cheap and lazy. Give me form-fitted chainmail catsuits thanks.
>>65338343No, but I would accept chainmail bikinis.
>>65338642How's that supposed to work? She's wearing a faraday cage.
>just squeeze your fat tiddies into this, hon
>>65338642HIGH VOLTAGE
>>65338465frills AND formfitting plate.>>65338343-4 STR penalty would still be an issue. You'd still need an explanation why she's on the battlefield at all and why she'd be useful there.>>65338459yeah sure, fantasy is easy modo because magic.
>>65338642DANGER!
>>65338465I mean dripping up actual armor with a dress sounds plausible.
>>65338343Her breastplate doesn't have the correct curvature.
>>65343759yeah it does
>>65338867>>female knight>>accuratemedieval people were short as fuck and malnourished. a modern female olympic athlete would absolutely mog them and could best them in hema, if trained properly.
>>65338465frilly dresses are too manly
>>65338642She is impervious to TASER pervert.
>>65338367>t.
>>65343492>imgSaved.
>>65344015https://x.com/HeavyMetalInk/media
>>65344036Boris was always good.
>>65344049TONS of gratuitous booba in this one!
>>65344861>the big JC himself: I'm here for the jews>guys who lived with JC: you have to be a jew>paul, who never met him: you can be anything you wantI'm not buying the argument. >>65344982>>65344049Barbarian chicks are rad.
my dad told me that back when he was a fencer the women all had special jackets with inserts for titty protectors that were basically metal bowls and if you hit them hard enough you could ring them like a bell
>>65344049>>65344982Barbarian Queen - by the numbers:>7 strip tits rapes>50+ pair of swinging boobs>6 nipple closeups>2 orgies, pleasure palace and gladiator barracks >1 strip tits/racked torture scene>1 butt crack dagger>1 full bush>200+ melay gladiator/rebels/guards/peasents riotBasically Hollywood's finest moment. HIGHLY recommened!
>>65345030Luke 14Matthew 20-22
>>65345337Barbarian Queen 100 - 0 checkmate
>>65343962>medieval people were short as fuck and malnourishedThey were not. It's the cucktorians who were malnourished midgets
>>65338565>her squire (who is much shorter than her) at one point licks her clean.Probably at least once.
>>65345910Wtf are you even saying? You're not being edgy, you're only being retarded.
If she is presented as exceptional and out of the ordinary, sure.
>>65345918>Wtf are you even saying? Well I can elaborate. It's quite easy to determine how tall people were in the past ages. Dig up a skeletons, measure them, and voila, as it turns out medieval knights were more or less 6ft tall. The idea of short medieval people comes from retarded cucks from the certain era, hence the cucktorians. Thanks to rapid industrialization, they lived in extremely crowded and drowning in shit cities, so they could project and extrapolate: >wow, if we are so malnourished, smelly, short and retarded can you even imagine how bad it was 3 centuries ago?As it turns out, not that bad.
>>65345942>just B specialBrave take.
>>65345958have you never seen a bull dyke?
>>65345965Not a hot one. I did watch Orange is the New Black. But what I saw was more butch dyke.
>>65345337>Luke 14>Matthew 20-22No mention of ministry to non-jews, even metaphorically. The insistence that the people from the road aren't jews is totally unsupported and is clearly referring to the poor and non-leaders of the jews. The only actual mention of non-jews is to criticize them for being unrighteous. To assert that the wedding banquet, tennet, or feast parables are referencing non-jews is the most twisted and tortured reading of it. The passages clearly refer to the reformed and and the lower classes of jews, not foreigners.>>65343488Mmm, tight maille...
>>65345337>Luke 14>28“Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Won’t you first sit down and estimate the cost to see if you have enough money to complete it?29For if you lay the foundation and are not able to finish it, everyone who sees it will ridicule you,30saying, ‘This person began to build and wasn’t able to finish.’I have always found this to be detestabe and now I am validated.
>>65345998>To assert that the wedding banquet, tennet, or feast parables are referencing non-jews is the most twisted and tortured reading of itI do not agreeit is in keeping with the principles laid down in Exodus 12:48 and Leviticus 19:34which of course must be read in concert with Leviticus 19:19, from which the church has greatly strayed from
>>65346097>Leviticus 19:19>...specifically linen and wool together (a mixture known as shatnez)Whoa. What are the odds?
>>65338343There is no actual evidence of a female warrior, defined as somebody who makes their life at war and whose social status depends on them being able to fight in battle.Every example we can find is from a non-white source and thus inherently suspect for numerous reasons. That's not to say a woman cannot pick up a weapon in desperation and then die, plenty of them have done that. But the idea of a female knight, guard, or other purely martial profession is idiotic. Women have snuck into the military and been oddly well received by the males in their company either due to sympathy or because they were giving out pussy on the sly. So it isn't like some feminist "oppression" fantasy were women were constantly "put in their place" by society as a whole or soldiers in particular, but that idea that a woman has anything meaningful to contribute to a battle utilizing muscle powered weapons is retarded. At best the women and sit back and chuck shit at the enemy to harass them like they did among the Scythians, and under those sort of circumstances its more a matter of desperation since the entire tribe is fighting and everyone with functional hands is contributing down to the children.
>>65346114>There is no actual evidence of a female warrior,Tard.
>>65346130>posts the most famous fucking cheerleader in history who was executed on the technicality of wearing pants while in disguisePost Boudica next you braindead faggot. Plenty of women had political status and were dressed or accoutered in the fashion of the nobility.
>>65346153>had political statusNAYRT but read nigger read>>65346114>defined as somebody who makes their life at war and whose social status depends on them being able to fight in battle.
>>65345947Professional warriors like knights would also have tended to have access to better quality foods like meat compared to peasants.
>>65346153>Post Boudica next you braindead faggot. Plenty of women had political status and were dressed or accoutered in the fashion of the nobility.>CartimanduaIn denial much?
>>65346218>add fowx earsWould.
>>65346218pauldron's on the wrong side>but what if she's left-handedthen her sword is hung on the wrong side and she's holding the poleaxe in the wrong handdiagnosis: this image is flipped
>>65346130She was more an artillery general in reality. Girl was autistic about cannons.
>>65346558Autistic grels are hot.
>>65345998>lagertha-viking-valkyrie-(...).jpgWTF is up with the selective blur in that pic?
>>65346114>There is no actual evidence of a female warriorClearly you never lived bordering Scythian lands.
>>65346558>She was more an artillery general in realityPhew, for a minute I was worried but French artillery autists are nothing to worry about.
>>65338465Safe, approved opinion.
>>65347382It's also simply the right opinion
>>65346153>posts the most famous fucking cheerleader in historyAt that point in time there were three categories of fighting.One on one dueling, formation on formation battleline tests of nerve, and general versus general tests of cleverness.They were esteemed in that order, and Joan exceled in both of the letter, eschewing only the former most.The miracles of Joan were never her somehow having physical martial prowess. In fact her trial transcripts have her stating she was proud to have never struck down an enemy by her own hand.The miracles of Joan were that she was an illiterate shepherdess who commanded like she was a veteran of a hundred battles and faced the press of the foe unflinchingly despite being teenage peasant.>>65338343Here is what we have a high certainty of was the custom armor the Dauphin had made for her when she convinced him to let her lead calvary charges."Charles VII provided Jeanne with a suit of armour costing 100 écus, either 2 500 sols or 125 tournois pounds. This was not an outstanding sum and contributed towards the inventory that Jeanne established during her trial: Through the Count of Laval’s testimony, we learn that the suit of armour was in fact a “harnois blanc”, or “all-in-one” suit of armour, rather than a suit comprising of several detachable pieces. In comparison, this suit of armour cost twice as much as the cheapest equipment used, yet cost eigh time less than the most expensive."[...]"After the inquest at Poitiers, Charles VII commissioned a suit of armor for Jeanne at the samme time that he set up a military household for her. The registra of the city hall of Albi, who saw her, testified that “Jeanne went armed in white iron, entirely from head to foot.” Moreover, Guy and André de Laval saw her on horseback near Romorantin “armed entirely in white, exept, for the head, a little ax in her hand, seated on a great black courser.”
>>65347449For you.
>>65347556>commanded like she was a veteran of a hundred battles and faced the press of the foe unflinchingly despite being teenage peasant.Almost anything we know about her comes from her rehabilitation trials in 1456, which was decades after her death. And none of it describes anything in detail, and is extremely biased to boot. At best, the information is lackluster, like she knew how to ride a horse, and at worst, it's a straight up lie, like she commanded artillery. If it seems unlikely, it is. This isn't fantasy, it's reality. She held a banner. That was it.
>>65347917>She held a banner.Prove it
>>65348034https://www.jeanne-darc.info/biography/banner/This page is all about her banner. The sources are listed there. The people here that believe that she commanded an army and won battles are retarded. There's ZERO sources indicating that she did anything other than hold a banner. There was a prophecy that a maiden from the country would save France, so they trained a cute girl and gave her a fucking flag. She didn't control an army, she didnt develop strategy, she didn't lead troops. She just rode around on a horse with a banner. Which is cool, but you'd have to be brain dead to believe it was anything other than that.
>>65346130The only real female warriors were onna bushi and they were primarily garrison forces
>>65338343>viking/migration period sword>14th century armor.Your thread is shit
>>65338565Just transition already.
>>65348183If you do not find tall, fit women hot you are a homosexual
>>65348186>imagines a scenario wherein he is smaller and weaker than the woman and subordinate to him>calls others gayNigga, you make Richard Simmons look like the straightest man alive.
>>65348112She led assaults on walls, going up ladders while holding her banner. Once she was knocked from a ladder by a large stone, and was also struck by an arrow between her shoulder and neck, it stuck a hand’s width out her back, and she was struck in the thigh by a crossbow bolt. These are discussed in her trials. We don’t only have her Trial of Rehabilitation as >>65347917 says, we also have the transcript of her Trial of Condemnation.
>one woman has made angloids seethe for almost six hundred yearslol!
>>65348361Would.
>>65338343Would Saber be good example of female knight?
>>65348383Isn't she a rule 63
The squire who helped her don her armor said she was “beautiful and shapely” with “beautiful breasts”.
>>65348177>27th century victims of the dunning-Kruger curve>”a guy from the the 21st century with Pennsylvania Rifle? Those are from 18th century! Your AI is shit!”
>>65348416If the image was labeled "post-modern period female rifle infantry" and had her wearing UCPs and carrying a Kentucky Rifle they would be right to criticize that
>>65347360As mentioned in the vary post you responded to picking up a weapon because there is nothing lost by you attempting to contribute to a battle does not mean you are a warrior.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoitT-Qhmg
>>65348553AI can be pretty good now and THIS is the slop you post?And you don't even have the courtesy to remove the black ones Unbelievable, you are human garbage
>>65348575;_;
>>65348575You say that, but I bet there's already some Indians reposting that image to Facebook talking about the brave Ukrainian female soldiers having to use muskets because of supply shortages.
>>65348631More!
>>65338343everybody knows that full plate is too cumbersome for peer to peer combat. real warriors wear as little armor as possible.
>>65348637Viva Ukrainian!!
>>65348791>real warriors wear as little armor as possible.Yes, I'm down to double condoms.
>>65348199>he is smaller and weaker than the woman and subordinate to him>subordinate to himnice Freudian slip homo
>>65346558Bitches love cannons.
>>65348378>Wouldfollow into battle, you mean
>>65346171Your average English medieval peasant had access or/and the money to buy meat, Victorian factory worker didn't. But either way, the argument was that the European knights were >short as fuck and malnourished
>>65338343I don't even accept films anymore. Trash medium, like theater.
>>65338459>girl movie about allegorized puberty that's been made 20 times before the 2000s and always makes a shitload of moneyQRD? I am dumb.
>>65338343>/co/ subhuman threadYou need to be lynched to death in the streets
>>65350090Edgy, but very underwhelming.
>>65346097>Old TestamentFriendly reminder that Christ invalidated the OT.
>>65345998>No mention of ministry to non-jews, even metaphorically.Given the context of Matthew 15 (where a Gentile gives themselves to God and receives absolution), Matthew 20 is stating that no one has priority over anyone else once they've given themselves up to God. Metaphorically speaking, the Jews are the ones who started working at the beginning and the Gentiles are the ones who came later but all of them have the same reward.
>>65348199>>65348183>Fellas, is it tranny and gay to have sex with women?/pol/estinians need to be shot
>>65351291I once had vaginal sex with the purpose of procreation, but she touched my balls and her hands were kinda rough. I guess I've aleays been gay.
>>65338343>knightA female in armor, absolutely. Queens and noble women were a thing and some of them were into cosplay, shit, some of them even commanded armies.>an actual female knight putting on armor and going into combatOnly if she's hot.
>>65351297>I guess I've aleays been gayThere is a lotion for that.
>>65351254came to fulfil, not invalidateand two millennia of theologians have agreed, the OT and NT all have the same moral code throughout, it is a logical and contiguous whole, because of course it was written by one person, and His people can discern His voice, John 10:27>>65351261Precisely
>>65351941>same moral code throughout,>Soloman get 1000 wives>Jesus gets noneKinda one sided. Not to mention that Jesus was married to Mary and Sarah and the NT was edited to redact that.
>subhuman off topic thread shitting up the wrong board>culminates in /x/ shitskins trying to compare Solomon to Christ.So fucking funny these inferiors are actually this retarded.Total oven fodder death
>Samurai women at the Battle of Aizu charged a line of bewildered riflemen shortly before they were gunned downAt least they cut a few down before being shot.
>>65348199I’m 6’4”, I don’t wanna be smaller and weaker than her, I just want someone up to my standard.
>>65338343Only if she's a member of Orde de la Atxa, the only actual military order to admit women (and in fact, women only) during the medieval era.
>>65351454>shit, some of them even commanded armies.From what I understand, speaking for the time, when Elizabeth I armored herself and spoke at Tilbury it was seen as rather noble.
>>65338343Yes
>>65353193>and in fact, women onlySpeculate the fragrance.
>>65338459>chainmail hoodie
>>65338343noshe also has to hit the gym (without performance enhancers), receive basic hema training, and the choreography has to make sense and not hand her the win (like editing out the opponent's weapons in post-production)if the star wars prequels can manage this, a modern production should be able to at the bare minimumthere should also be at least one gratuitous sweaty ab shot
>>65338367
>>65338343There's a hentai about a female knight that looks just like that with the bowlcut, its one of my all time favorites.
>>65357359Cool story, bro. Except no imgs on img bbs, no link, no title, no shit.
God imagine meeting a female knight during a castle siege at dusk with snowflakes lilting through the air on a soft breeze, as you are storming the castle she confronts you in full harness, you can already see her hands are shaking, she doesn't hold the sword quite right. You strike at her with your warhammer, she parries you competently, but steps back, and you are able to press the advantage, slamming at her over and over, knocking her helmet off, you can see the panic on her pale face now as she desperately tries to fend you off, you slam into her as she turns to sprint back from you, knocking her against the wall with a girlish yelp, slamming your warhammer into her and denting her breastplate, stoving it in, probably cracking a rib. She falls, desperately trying to fend you off, but you slam your warhammer into her gauntlet, the shock of your mighty blow knocking it from her hand. It clangs onto th stone nearby, and you kick it away, then stomp on her wrist. You can see the fear in her young innocent eyes, realizing her training was not enough, and she doesn't belong here. She is wheezing slightly from her broken rib pressing against her lung. She knows it's over for her. She thrashes desperately, but you are able to stomp on her upper arm, paralyzing her with pain. She shrieks, but no one comes to help her. You're able to hook your hammer under some of her armor plating and rip it away, exposing her sweat-soaked gambeson, and her soft vulnerable breasts. You can slide out your slender bollocks dagger from its sheathe, kneeling atop her as she thrashes, tries to spit blood at you, but you just pin her broken arms, ignore the kicking of her strong fertile thighs, and slide it slowly into her throat, blood spurting out like a geyser, watching her eyes go blank and glassy as she surrenders utterly to the interminable will of death. Then leave her for the crows to peck away at, slowly consuming her body, digesting her fertile young body for energy.
>>65353152that's rough, man.
>>65338343 >accurately attired? knight armor designed for women would more likely follow contemporary women's fashion trends like how the men's armor also followed men's fashion stuff like seiba fatesdaynight are technically closer to being accurate than a woman in men's armor, but fall short of being 100% correct
>>65357545My bad my nigga, here you go: >code 465004>[Asaki Blog Branch Office (Asaki Takayuki)] Rowan Nyokenshi wa Kakusenai | Rowan, the Swordswoman in Plain Sight [English] [cutegyaruTL]I guess I misremembered a bit, doesn't look quite the same but shes got a bowlcut and shes a knight/swordsman, close enough.
>>65338343I always thought women look sexy in medieval armor
>>65358371
>>65358371>pic not related
>>65358462yeah yeah yeah you nerd, I get it. It's peak sexy though. Second pic is closer to a traditional set of medieval armor.
>>65358371Oh, we need more like this.
>>65349447Yeah, idk either, bro.
>>65358547There's a chink in your armor.
>>65358581Lol. This is where it's at right here. Some fine aryan pussy (french). I forgot I had this pic.
>>65358581Classic
>>65358587>aryan>frenxhTry again.
>>65358644Congrats, you found a joke.
>>65358644you are best at identifying jokes!
>>65358728>>65358768FU both! I AM a j9ke! Top that, u cant. Checkmate fagots!
>>65358581I'm chinese and I hate that this idiom basically isn't used anymore, it always gave me a giggle hearing it
Thanks for making me remember Baremaidens
whores
>>65358371>Those scarsClearly the chainmail bikini was insufficient.
>>65359510ikr. Clearly she was the daughter of a middle class craftsmen and could only afford bits and pieces of armor. She's also eight feet tall, so all the manlets only have her legs to slash at.
>>65358863Would.
>>65359555Or just a cutter. Would a cutter.
>>65359565wouldn't we all
>>65359565Everybody does at least once, bpd is scary shit
>>65358856>>65358863>>65358866>Baremaidens>whoresThat's how I met Tanya Tate. Boring fuck. Good bod back then though.
>>65357560This.If it's a fantasy setting with a precedent for female knights/dames, they would have slightly different armour.Picrel is actually pretty decent for it, albeit a little fantastical.
>>65360658Knights wore armor with antlers and giant cocks and steel buck teeth on the front of it, if at least some of your armor doesn't look retarded its not believable.That said women shouldn't be on the battlefield most of all because of the exponentially higher damage it does to their joints than it does men, which is not easily solved with Fantasy "These are superior women" stuff, as it has to do with the shape of women and so the fantasy man should always be able to march much further and carry much more without half crippling himself.
>>65357621 this one was pretty good. i destroyed my boxers and passed out for like 4 hours
>>65362893
>>65362735>Knights wore armor with antlers and giant cocks and steel buck teeth on the front of itto parades and for bragging, not for fighting
>>65363028There were absolutely armor with codpieces meant for battlefields
>>65338343>accurately
>>65363030A war trophy worth brinin home to the missus.
Right now the Medieval Combat World Championship is taking place in Denmark.There are a numerous women participating.Here's a Polish girl sporting a cute lace-trimmed skirted tunic. Just like in (Your) animes.
I should probably include a link to the stream.https://youtube.com/watch?v=YxgNHdtArVoThis is Poland ("Katerina") vs Brazil.Brazil also sent a bunch of people of both sexes.Apparently the Brazilians wear light armor for speed. But this means more bruising.Now THIS is some fap material.*clank* *clank* *clank*
>>65363812Why butt has tumor? I thought Danelandia has health caring?
>>65358644To be Frank, Franks were originally a Germanic tribe.
>>65363921That's his straw buckler
>>65338343Do you mean a dame, the female noble title equivalent to a knight?It depends on the historic period and which knightly order
>>65364915>To be FrankWe ot a wiseacre here. Btw, jwtf does that mean?
>she's a dame I tell ya>and I don't mean royalty>just a regular dame
I'd accept one into my bed
>>65346114do you count otherwise normal women who had a single heroic moment of rage?
>>65348395Nobody checked the sex of arthur's skeleton.
>>65362735>which is not easily solved with Fantasy "These are superior women" stuffWat? Fantasy is full of bullshit that can easily solve this. Even low-fantasy stuff.>awesome materials that are light as fabric but stronger than steel, meaning less wear>buffs (I'm sorry, "blessed by the gods" or somesuch)>non-human lineages>something something water from an elven spring that cures all fatigue>fantasy man should always be able to march much furtherAnd yet halflings managed to journey for months alongside aragon.
>>65365604Doesn't fully count.Righteous violence is the seed of all noble lineage, and she will've matured within the Christian order of her town. She's almost there.But to be "knightly," she'd need to persist for decades in an order that goes a step further than that.There would need to be athletic discipline and steady occupation of an enforcement role for her... More than one flash of rage. She'd need to set herself out for social recognition with potential of hostile targeting, and then survive.If there had been a mechanism for induction into that route and she had taken it, only then could she be a lady-knight beyond a folk-hero.It would be a limited and truncated path because you would want such a woman married and forming a family to multiply your warriors after proving herself. Not getting killed prematurely.
yeah
>>65365578You would accept a goat in a wig into your bed.
>>65365722Probably, what's your point?
alright thenI can also present forth>Nakano Tekekoonna-musha, garrison soldier or not, was a person who was a person who by trade relied on their sword to make their wayhad a confirmed eyewitness kill count leading offensive charges against firearm wielding combatantsHitler called Japs honorary aryans so I say it counts>Queen Nzinganot very knightly considering the accounts of her personally executing captives however by the criteria of social status depending on being able to fight in battle her entire legitimately hinged on being able to wage war against the Portuguese which by accounts from the Portuguese themselves she did and personality from the front linesswarthy but depending on who you ask they count as white>Juana Azurduyalso not very knightly as she was a guerrilla commander but commander she was, doing well enough to get promoted to lieutenant colonel of the independence forcespromoted for propaganda, maybe you can say so but as she is on record of leading cavalry charges, one of which ended with her personally slaying a Spanish officer and capturing their regiment standard I'd say it's earnedother accounts involved her riding into battle pregnant and rallying to retrieve her executed husband's decapitated head in battlenon-white records but Argies like to think they're white so close enoughalso it's a fun additionshe seems fun, apparently she's described as an aggresive firecracker but also a pious empathetic camp mother
>>65365719oh my amazon special
>>65365696>Righteous violence is the seed of all noble lineage, and she will've matured within the Christian order of her townShe was the next best thing to knighted for her effort, she got a royal exemption from taxes for her and her husband, who she was permitted to marry against some rule or other.
3d girls are hot.
>>65368767I wish I had a 3d woman(real)
>>65368767Bernadette is so emaciated that she counts as honorary 2D. And her take on an armored dress was absolutely awful. She only bothered to commission actual metal parts for the legs, and the torso is constructed more like a fabric version of the Dendra Panoply than gothic plate.
>>65368767
>>65368826>absolutely awful.Agreed, but the scenes of her and "her girl" stitching in the balmy tropics of London under cozies drinking a cuppa next to the radiators wear beyond all my rainy day fantasies! And the embroidery she sourced was pretty awesome, too. Very /cgl/.
>>65338465gay
>>65359565The craziest sex you'll ever have, but she'll also cut your balls and pecker off while you sleep.
>>65357551While this anon understands the thematic draw of snuff and guro, the contrasting and intermixing of fertility, life, and death, this writing lacks historical grounding. The primary incentive of medieval warfare for the foot soldier and knight was the acquisition of wealth, status, titles, and land. Even in the case of internal crusades against heretics within the mainland of Europe, combatants primarily were concerned with the wealth and land acquisition of said heretics. The religious aspect merely provided casus belli and was a spiritual cream on top incentive. Passing up the chance for a fat ransom for a noblewoman whose family was able to both outfit and train her is something only a homosexual or chemically imbalanced individual would do. Also, armor fastening clasps were either made of metal or boiled leather. You're not ripping the pieces of a harness apart even with the leverage of a claw hammer.
>>65368985>fat ransom for a noblewomanBut they were still raped repeatedly before being returned for money, r.right?
>>65369036Indubitably
>>65346475why would it be on the left side? if you were right handed and facing towards the enemy your weapon would cover your left side more easily than your right.
*record scratch*Yep, that's me. You might be wondering how I ended up in this position...(two Danish girls trot up to pounce on a lone, cornered Perkele, who seems resigned to her fate)Oh my...
A Star-Spangled Knightess of Liberty throws down her opponent: a gator-green striped, sunburnt, unwashed Outback Sheila-Chevalier.U-S-A!U-S-A!U-S-A!
>>65369401Well done.
>>65368826>#>BernadetteProps for semi legitimacy. Name another cos player who cuts her own hair with a broadsword?>inb4 autistic that's not a broadsword that's a...
>>65338898ye olde mating presse
The problem with female knights is that even men back then didn't get that big even as knights due to rather mixed nutritional standards. You're talking someone 5 foot 4 at the tallest and maybe weighing 120 pounds. As a combatant? Very mediocre. If there's some nobility larping and the female knight isn't expected to fight, whatever you want. Why would you turn some cute peasant girl into a mediocre yeowoman instead of just having her be your mistress anyways? After all I know this is a loosely covered sexual fantasy of fucking a woman in armor or something. =
>>65371000This is why the Good Lord decided to bless us mere meek peasants with His holy crossbow.
>>65369036How are you supposed to ransom her if she is despoiled? They are not going to pay for her if she’s had a battering ram team run on her
>>65371440Shame her into silence.
>>65348442>picking up a weapon and killing a man doesn't count when I say it doesn'tBoy I sure am glad I can kill your reddit ass and get off scott free because killing redditors isn't murder (source: me)>>65350090Lynched TO DEATH he says...>hello? GM?>Yeah?>I want to lynch this guy>Uh??>I want this to be non lethal of course>...of course>I rolled a 20 on the die! Yeah! He's lynched but not dead, right?>God smites you to death on the spot. Non lethally of course. Do that again and your next cosmic brownie shake has laxatives in it
>>65373310>Boy I sure am glad I can kill your reddit ass and get off scott freeAre you sure you're in the right thread?This was about female warriors and the post you're responding to is claiming that Scythian women only picked up weapons in defence.Whether that's true and they didn't go out raiding while the men were off on campaign might be a topic to explore but your scenario seems to be about attributing false statements to anon and then mocking them for saying what you're pretending they said.
>>65373326>pretendingI am very sure I am in exactly the correct thread you inbred drooloid zoomie fuck. YOU CAN LITERALLY SCROLL UP AND READ THE THREAD RIGHT NOW YOU FAG. Such dysgenic freaks shit up every thread known to man and it is my immense honor to shit right back down their throats, fuck you very much. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please direct them down the barrel of a loaded glock. QED, KYS.
>>65338343>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Oqql6RErHcyes
>>65373510>I am very sure I am in exactly the correct thread you inbred drooloid zoomie fuckWell I'm >>65347360And I posted>Clearly you never lived bordering Scythian lands.So I'm at a bit of a loss as to how >>I rolled a 20 on the die! Yeah! He's lynched but not dead, right?>>God smites you to death on the spot. Non lethally of course. Do that again and your next cosmic brownie shake has laxatives in it...in some way relates to the practices of Scythian women and whether they did or did not raid neighbouring lands for thralls and valuables?
>>65338465First one for barbarians, second for poor adventurers and last one for the haughty ojou noble lady, who thinks she's hot shit.
>>65371000>Nobleman: Damn that french bastard, he deserves to be raped.>...>Lord, forgive my sinful thoughts, I do not mean to engage in sodomy.>The sky clears, a pillar of light falls through an oriel, shining on a maidservant currently polishing a piece of decorative armor.>Thank you, Heavenly Father.
>>65371000>somethingMmm, something....
>>65365604No , it's called getting lucky. I'm 6'3" weigh 220 and bench 370. However if I come around the corner of a hovel during a raid and a 100lbs soaking wet woman stabs at me with a spear there is the possibility it could glance off my breastplate and if I'm not wearing my helmet or gorget it could stab me right in the neck. At which point I'd probably say something like "HURKKKK!" then die because there is a hunk of sharp steel logged in my spine. Shit does happen, but what's more likely to happen is she'd be the one getting stabbed, with dick.>>65365661The issue isn't even throwing girls a bone(giggity) in fantasy. Animu does that all the time and nobody cares. People do get pissed though when it is done for blatant political purposes, because that is a sign of a larger problem which will ruin things you like and ultimately society itself. Don't be a faggot. Be racist and sexist, because race and sexual dimorphism are real material phenomena and if you don't account for them you are retarded and will never make a predictive model of human behavior.Tolkein's midgets exist for his Christian morality play, so them being small and weak serves a narrative function. While in something like the Black Company the actual pygmy nigger is only effective because he uses magic and therefore gets to cheat. You can have weird characters in very different settings but they have to either serve a narrative purpose(and that narrative not be retarded and political) or have some mitigating factor which makes their obvious inferiority unimportant.
>>65338343No, I need them titties hanging out
>>65377298>While in something like the Black Company the actual pygmy nigger is only effective because he uses magic and therefore gets to cheatDoesn't he lose his magic for a while (I think he can't use it because it would be detected or would be a way for him to be possessed or something) and is still pretty useful because he's a cunning little shit who's been a cut-throat mercenary cunt for uncounted decades.
>>65377312>Hanging out for everyone to see instead of being bundled under several layers collecting sweat waiting for you to enjoy them
>>65338343No, only faggots would accept that shit.
>>65338473>>65338555Faggots
By accurately attired I hope you mean something like this.
>>65357621Almost a little too bimboey for me, if that even makes sense. Also I hate when their cock is as big as their entire forearm and fist.
>>65348124t. gets all his knowledge from Total war
>>65377365Accurately targeting my dick.
>>65377365Yes, most girls I see look just like this.
>>65343962they were a hell of a lot srtonger than heralso watch video "female fights basically anyone"
>>65338367correct
>>65368769even if you do manage to fuck a whole bunch, eventually you get bored and slow down, then kinda just not care anymore.What precisely would you envy?
>>65357551>>65368985my AI said you're both gay
>>65371000some things I read said it depended on the era, heights for men were found to be generally from 5'5 to 5'9 (165-175cm)I've always heard it said an average for the middle ages was 5'7 and that makes it simple for me.Also these guys could wear 45 pounds of armor and march and battle all day. They'd still be stronger and healthier than most.
>>65343488Now this guy gets it.>Not a tired, rehearsed trope that's basically just 'fantasy bikini girl'.>Blends best part of latex fetish and armour fetish.>Hugs body in a way that's provocative, but concealing, and isn't normalized to the viewer like a bikini is.>Can be used to hide identity, or create new one due to surface area. Actually has enough body to work with to be made beautiful/sexy by itself (unlike a bikini which just defers that responsibility to the wearer).>Doesn't depend on total suspension of disbelief to function in the setting. Actually works.
Haven't you forgotten about her?
>>65385011>pure mucsle>tummy fat obviousI would slap her ass though.
>>65385541Yeah she doesn't look muscular at all, still would devote my life to her at the drop of a hat
There is no greater societal use of women.
>>65363028No, they actually wore that shit to war. But the frills, like the Black Prince's kitty cat, were designed to break off.
I assume armor was unisex in the first place. The chest plate is curved and extruded further than the actual chest just so the person wearing it can breath. In fact it's more believable for a female knight to not say anything because "le church" forbid women to fight. The best thing they can do is be the most dapper one in armor, as a knight should. Any armor that shapes to a woman's body is objectively thinner and inferior armor, and can be dropped by a huntsman with a 100lb bow just like the movies.
Get you a ruff n' tumble wrasslin' tomboy goober that rolls with butt trumpet heraldry. [Ukraine vs. Finland :: Women 5v5]>>65371000Although wimmin in armor are tasty, and there was a brief thread on /gif/ 2 weeks ago, which featured a few dozen webms of semi-nude & schlicking women in various armors, the real appeal is picrel.>>65345915They played into the lesbo angle at least one other time, that being an episode in India.>>65388787>>65385011Den mothers. Any woman beside this one is a compromise.
>>65390723>at least one other timeAll in all, it was a pretty great series, with real character development. Better than Buffy which literally lost viewers over clumsy Season 4 decisions.
>>65385011>pure muscle For the last time BBW is not muscle even if that body is real.
>>65390767Obviously not 100% pure, but I get the vibe of her being working farm girl fat rather than fatfat.
>>65391512I get the "vibe" of her having a genetic oddity.
>>65391526I get a vibe in my benis!
>>65390691>I assume armor was unisexI know most people on this board have never been intimate with the body of a woman, but there's more differences than "no penis and has tits." Proportions are different and shapes are different. Added on are the fact that those proportions and shapes are far more variable between two women than they are between two men.
>>65343680>You'd still need an explanation why she's on the battlefield at all and why she'd be useful there.Fantasy? Her grand-grand-grand-grandmother was a half giant, so while the size genes have vanished quite a lot, she can benchpress two dudes without a sweat.Boring? Crossbow+shield combo, and good to go.
>>65338343No. Women can't be knights
>>65391641The Queen is more powerful than The Knight. Everyone knows this.
>>65391641I guess.
Women can be Godess'.
>>65363028>to parades and for bragging, not for fightingBullshit.There's always going to be mad lads doing hilarious things on the battlefield.And since knights are wealthy and spoiled, they're going to be madder than most.
>>65395569>Women can be Godess'.All godesses are women aren't they?
>>65395573Canadians on D-Day?
>>65338343FUCK no! What the fuck do you pussies not understand about the biological differences and roles of men and women?Fuck off.
>>65395578No, a Bong. He also captured 20~ guys because he charged them with his sword and they thought he was insane. He also had the last recorded longbow kill in a war, when he went "watch this" and shot a guy with the bow and killed him.There was another crazy Bong who disabled a German armored car with an umbrella by blinding the driver by shoving it through the vision slit.
@65386793touch grass
>>65395569Reminder that in three separate occasions, Artemis was spotted naked bathing and each time it happened there was a different random punishment1. First guy (Siprioties) was turned into a woman2. Second guy (Acetion or something) was turned into a stag and was subsequently killed and eaten by his own hunting dogs3. Third guy (who was the son of Ares) was turned into a rockThat's ignoring>Iphis was the girl raised as a boy and then turned into a man by Isis (this is a Greek-Egyptian story)>Leto turned Leucippus into a woman>A woman turned into a man but had the benefit of being invulnerable so he(she) went and did shit and got into a fight with centaurs and because was invulnerable was smashed into the ground (and then depending on who tells the story either died, got smashed to Tarturus or got turned into a bird and escaped)But the ultimate genderbending story is (well, Eustathios version anyway)>Tiresias was originally a who got musical lessons from Apollo so she could write songs for him and then when lessons were over went 'get fucked', got turned into a man, then got turned back into a woman again but not explained why or by who and then Hera turned her(him) back into a man because she offended him and then Zeus went 'no he's hotter as a woman' and turned her back into a woman. Then the Muses turned her into a man again, Aphrodite suddenly appears and turns him(her) back into a woman and then finally into a mouseSo, yes, women can be Goddesses but the issue is they're just as likely to turn you into a woman or into a man, or a rock or a deer or a mouse or loads of other things because women are random and vicious.
>>65395725was originally a woman*because she offended her*
>>65395695Wow, who punched your cooter?
>>65338343>1: Is the setting ridiculously over the top and not trying to be realistic? >2: Does the knight look cute without the armor? >3: Is the armor at least designed to look cute on the female knight?>4: Is she not shown as being somehow stronger than men twice her size?Nobody wants another bull-dyke girlboss OP. Even the women are getting sick of that shit.
>>65338343Already did.The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc1999>but she is not a knightShe is in armor on horseback, has received the adoubement and charges in battle.Good enough for me.
>>65338343No. Knight is a male term. If it was "Dame" taking up arms to defend her Lady, then yeah. Sure. It's a fucking shame that assholes are trying to commandeer the word knight, when DAME is already the female status for it. I want to see ARMOR DAMES, god damn it!
>>65338979>>65338898I'm pretty sure he posts here and posts long winded autistic takes on MesoAmerica.
>>65395715>touch grassIf grass is a euphemism for female pubic hair, we both know that will never happen.
>>65395725>because women are random and vicious.That's really not the moral of the story.It's that *gods* are random and vicious.
>>65395695We just think it's sexy. Chill out.
>>65338343I would accept a female knight if her entire character and purpose within the setting and story wasn't specifically designed to give men The Ick.Foids talk about getting The Ick as though overwhelming feelings of disgust are somehow exclusive to their sex. As with most things, they're wrong.
>>65396673>>65365334
>>65338465Based. Halfway between 2 and 3, best of both worlds.>>65348383The best example. Nobody else comes close. She was written as a man then switched to a woman pretty late in development without changing much.
>>65397493I mean, yes. But the issue is that Artemis is peeped on three times and does three separate punishments. Not even related.
>>65401275Meanwhile Zeus is perfectly consistent; He sees a woman and he rapes her
>>65338367Only if she was really sweaty and filthy. Just imagine it.
>>65343962you think men who were born and bred for combat, training from childhood were malnourished? a crackhead can stab an mma fighter to death if he's desperate enough
>>65397425unfathomably based if true
>>65338343Only if she looks like Saint Celestine.
>>65396673Why is English so retarded? The titles have specific meaning and function, a knighted woman should be called a knight, and one should not make up some random words to name a title, that already fucking exist.
>>65401608Men and women are different
>>65401619The functions they serve at give no fuck. If woman wins USA presidency, should she be called POTUS, or in retarded English fashion - a first lady of US?
>>65401645>The functions they serve at give no fuck.Yes they do? A dame isn't going to be required to fight, a knight's main purpose.
>>65401703The argument started by claiming that dame is a female version of a knight, and that's something I find retarded. If a dame has different role than a knight, then that's fine by me.
>>65401645>The functions they serve at give no fuck.They absolutely do. If the function that they serve at requires physical strength, there will always be a clear difference in performance between men and women. Look at infantry in any of the world's militaries and you'll see what I'm talking about.
>>65401369Would.
>>65401270>Halfway between 2 and 3, best of both worlds.Halfway between 1 and zero, if you know what I mean, wink, wink, nude, nudge.
>>65402079No, I don't know what you mean. Artoria is a dignified knight and would never go into battle half naked.
>>65401924It literally doesn't matter, you can give talentless individuals some nicknames for being jobbers or strip them of their title, but you don't change a name of their function. Women being bad at warf- well bad at everything, but especially bad at warfare means they were basically barred from becoming knights, but in some reality where that isn't the case, they should simply be called knights.
>>65396673No dipshit, "dame" is an honorific form of address. It's the female equivalent of "sir." The title that bestows the honorific would still be "knight," since there is no female equivalent to a knight bachelor and she would just use the male honorific as an exception.Your argument is like saying a woman who is a professional woodworker shouldn't be called "carpenter" and instead be called "Miss." It's just a fundamentally illiterate line of argument.
>>65370879>>inb4 autistic that's not a broadsword that's a...the blade looks like a typical broadsword so there's a possibility of it being one if there's a basket hilt down there out of shot
Here we see a Knightess of Liberty, guarding the Sacred Grail of her Order: the Red Solo Cups.[IMCF 2025 Women's 5v5: USA vs. Brazil]
Another Knightess of Libery, whom they dub Lady Butterface, for reasons unexplained; presumably she may have risen from a family of dairy farmers...
>>65401280>Meanwhile Zeus is perfectly consistent; He sees a woman and he rapes herHe punishes women who reject him too and Hera punishes women who don't, or who are raped by him.Occasionally she rewards or protects women who resist or escape him but usually in a fucked up divine way like turning them into an ornament so they can't be raped, then putting that ornament in the heavens as a star.Knight is descended from the word for a young male servant. It pretty much means "a lord's lad". Feudal house niggers basically. From there they became a social class and the word just referred to them directly instead of describing them.Dame is a word for a lady i.e. a woman of noble birth or marriage, so it's the word for the wife of a knight.Once you can elevate women directly, calling them Dames in their own right makes sense culturally and linguistically, if not quite historically.>>65401645>If woman wins USA presidency, should she be called POTUS, or in retarded English fashion - a first lady of US?She would be the POTUS and her husband would be First Gentleman or FGOTUS.There's precedent for this in other countries and I assume US states do something similar with their gubanatorial husbands.
>>65338898Now this is a confusing erection.
>>65401730>dame is a female version of a knightBasically true.>and that's something I find retardedThat's a you problem.>If a dame has different role than a knightThey certainly did historically, very few wives of knights were expected to handle a longsword and I'm sure it was vanishingly rare for them to joust in tourneys.In modern times, all a knight does is act poncy because they donated to the winning party in an election or had a long career in civil service without fucking up more than they could blame someone else for. Or possibly were just popular with the public and given a gong so that they lend an air of public acceptability to the institution.It's no longer a gendered role, so Dames and Knights now have precisely the same thing and are just gendered terms for being a ponce.
