[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: F-16XL_.jpg (79 KB, 860x484)
79 KB JPG
The F-16 seems to be one of the best airplanes ever made.
Small, cheap and deadly.

Why not make the F-16XL?

Maybe also improve it to reduce the radar cross section, by removing the single vertical stabilizer, and then adding two, one on each side of the engine on an angle.

Also add that bulge on the air intake that is seen on the F-35
>>
>>65374859
>Shouldn't they give the F-16XL another chance?
No. For the simple reason that it's ugly.
>>
>>65374862
Ur ugly, uggo
>>
I always wonder that myself. It cant be that hard to rebuild a jet resized proportionally larger to a new turbine. Like, why keep building the f1sex out of old f110s when the f135 is in production?

Its gotta slash the r&d down to almost nothing
>>
>>65374911
Jets are sensitive and optimized beasts, a minor shift of the center of mass or even a fuel line readjustment would just become a butterfly effect of revisions to the point of it being cheaper to just design a newer plane
>>
>>65374859
I could make another thread but this one is similar enough; why didn't Boeing do the same for the X-32? Maybe as revenge for losing the JSF program.

This is also assuming that there's an air force or navy crazy enough to buy this happy guy
>>
>>65374862
FPBP
/thread
>>
>>65374859
We already have it one.
It is name TEJAS
>>
File: jc.gif (970 KB, 500x268)
970 KB GIF
>>65374911
>>
>>65375115
Superpower by 2030, Saar.
>>
They should just give the XL treatment to the F-35 and put it up as an A-10 replacement
>fast
>lots of hardpoints for SDBs or APKWS
>big wings = shitloads of fuel
>lots of fuel means long loiter times
>>
>>65375218
the F-35 *is* the A-10 replacement for peer war CAS purposes
for Toyota-plinking, the F-16 as-is would be sufficient
or perhaps large drones
>>
>>65375221
Sorry, I meant Boomer Approved(tm) replacement.

All though it won’t truly get approval until it Carrie’s a big useless gun. So maybe a central hardpoint for a 30mm pod?
>>
File: file.png (276 KB, 500x387)
276 KB PNG
>>65375226
>Boomer Approved(tm)
>it won’t truly get approval until it Carrie’s a big useless gun
>>
File: 20260802.jpg (310 KB, 1920x1080)
310 KB JPG
>>65374859
It's like having a naval F-16; so many comprises and changes that you might as well have a new jet.
F-15 is effectively a F-16XL
>>
>>65374862
Your are unable to see beauty as It is your soul that is ugly.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.