What did /k/ think?
>>65375153Maximum larp.
>>65375160Elaborate?
>>65375153Are you the chinless dishonorable discharge /pol/troon?
>>65375163I don't understand the reference.
>>65375162Basic facts, such as "SOF K9's get fed human meat, and have their teeth replaced with titanium dentures which have to be removed at retirement because the dogs bloodlust is so great it will attack humans on sight" is a great one.
>>65375181Well first of all he was quoting someone, relaying what the guy shot dead in the first chapter claimed.The guy said he was told after a firefight the dog was allowed to chew on bodies, could be committing cold blooded murder and doing tons of drugs be so morally upright they wouldn't allow a dog to gnaw on a corpse?And they do get titanium teeth - pic related. Are they removed after service I dunno but that was what was relayed maybe for that particular pooch it was the case.
>>65375200I remember that dog being posted, its a police dog from either Tennessee or Georgia, and its was teeth capped because it had worn them down over 7 years of work and training.Are you really so gullible that you believe a mwd would get titanium teeth caps and also get them removed? Nothing about that makes sense if you just took a minute on Google to study how a fucking worn tooth is capped. I could believe the dog chewing on a KIA because the handler wants to be a dick, but metal teeth to increase the lethality of a fucking dog is some james bond villain level fantasy and I would immediately question the professional aptitude of anyone who pushes such a story.
>>65375200>posts a police dogReally bitch. >titanium teeth are only for dental repair Where is it stated that K9's have their teeth removed? And where is it stated that the dogs are fed human flesh?
>>65375200Are your critical thinking skills so atrophied that you believe three levels of hearsay? This book is unsubstantiated fanwank for self-hating libs.
>>65375153Lions, the type of low inhibit warriors that made this nation. Unironically based and being an outlaw like that seems cool
>>65375235>its just onecope>>65375238First chapter, someone the author is interviewing claims the dead guy made that claim about his dog - he let it chew on bodies, its titanium teeth had to be removed after it retired.>>65375254>focusing one one anecdotal tale about a dog told to the writer that they don't even report as fact to try to disprove the whole thingyou got a dog in this fight hombre, it a little too close to home?
>>65375254>Are your critical thinking skills so atrophied that you believe three levels of hearsay?Should we also apply critical thinking to the claim that murderers and drug addicts wouldn't allow a dog to chew on a dead body
>>65375317It's also coupled with easily disprovable facts, such as the titanium teeth. The whole book read like one of those Netflix true crime dramas. It's heavily editorialized to make the events seem more sordid than they really were. It's not a balanced piece of journalism.
>>65375329>easily disprovable facts>heckin doggorino in the first chapter I read for free on amazonNothings been disproved. You've simply begged the question. No independent reports that the guy had no dog, or that it wasn't a retired k9, or that it didn't have teeth removed, or that retired k9 with behavioral problems keep their teeth.>It's heavily editorialized to make the events seem more sordid than they really were.Give me an example, from beyond the first chapter, of the sordid editorialization.>balanced piece of journalismSon, this isn't gamergate. It is about criminal proceedings and the culture and institution that produced it. This is how you do critical inquiry.
>>65375153the syrmor video about Fort Hood is superior in every way.
>>65375405
>>65375392I haven't even read it, and you sound like a retard. Looks like pulp slop like that one where the SS join the French Foreign Legion and then all keep meeting up like some Nazi A-Team that people took at face value.I'm sure grunts do drugs, and fuck questionably aged prostitutes, and there's probably a circle who facilitated that, but that's just dumb grunt shit.
Hey OP, you're not gonna get genuine discussion or good-faith arguments on /k/Sorry you wasted your time
>>65375153This book is the equivalent to low effort true crime women slop, but for bearded dude bros with wearing sunglasses in front seat of truck profile pics.
>>65375429those guys would hate this, they think special forces are patriotic god warriors
>>65375422>I haven't read I just wont let you talk smack about le hecking pupperkino>>65375429>reporting about crimes and conspiracies?>that's for women
>>65375447Nah, that's why they love it. You think chick reading werewolf smut actually wants to get dicked down and mangled by a knot sporting wolf? Hell no, but the forbidden fantasy makes it all the sweeter.
>>65375153Writer displays his terminal thirdie brain on twitter frequently, I assume his book is dishonest in some way because of this
>>65375471In English you dumb frog poster
>>65375497Writer is mentally brown, book probably bad
>>65375414https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_G_wXt_NxrYIts depressing as shit and long
>>65375514No one's watching a 6hr movie with video game characters as avatars.
>>65375530Your loss
>>65375153Biggest problem with the book is the partisan lefty slant. Legitimately showing how black markets intertwine with special forces/military is an excellent topic that needs discussion. >Cadaver connection. >Phoenix Program>Afghan poppy fields.
If this was about Navy SEALs/DEVGRU, none of you faggots would have a problem, because it’s the current thing to shit on them.But because this is about your precious Delta Force you homos love to glaze, you’re all upset. Not the authors problem Delta has its ranks filled with junkies.
>>65375153>>65375791
>>65375828This guy is beyond lib, he's a massive contrarian. Litteraly his only stance seems to be against what ever the popular (or correct) opinion is.
