.357 Magnum 158 grain jacketed hollow point rounds circumcised or uncircumcised?
Damn it, why did it flip? Whatever. Seriously though /k/, what kind of damage would shooting this round do to my gun?
>>65392986Back in MY day the go-to was the Federal 125 grain SJHP and there ain't no reason to change.
>>65393007wadcutters are fine in a revolver
>>65393022It's not a wadcutter, it's a JHP but the jacket wasn't cut away, hence uncircumcised.
>>65393027>it's a JHP but the jacket wasn't cut awayFor what purpose?
>>65393027Please describe, in detail, how do you imagine this ammunition is made.
>>65393029I imagine it is a manufacturing defect, a funny one at that. I was just curious if anybody might have any insight into how it would shoot.
>>65393007All you did was put it in backwards. Now it can punch through tank armor.
>>65393037Well it came in my box of JHP rounds that all look like the one on the bottom. And it doesn't quite appear to be a wadcutter, so I assume it is a manufacturing error where the bronze jacket wasn't cut away fully, hence uncircumcised.
>>65393051Pull the bullet. Would be cool to have a perfect cylinder.
>>65393051>Well it came in my box of JHP roundsthe booolet is inserted upsides downey
lets see your wadcutters do this lol
>>65393051You make me wonder if solid copper wadcutters were ever a thing.
>>65393082Huh, that could be.>>65393086That's pretty neat. I just use a speedloader.
>circumcised or uncircumcised?Which feels better when it goes inside you?
>>65393007>Damn it, why did it flip?No one tell him
>>65393042>>65393082You guys were right, didn't know that could happen. So in that case, what is it like shooting a backwards bullet?
>>65393154I hear they're very flat shooting :carlos:
>>65393007Get a better gun.
>>65393218I like mine though.
>>65393154You have to stand to the side so it doesn’t come through you since it’s going backwards. Very dangerous!
>>65392986>>65393007>>65393038>>65393051>>65393154You expect us to believe this, but don't think to name the brand?
>>65392986Jacketed flat point
>>65393007EXIF got scrubbedI didn't have that problem with my previous phone but apparently my new one encodes pic orientation in a different manner
>>65393018This but Underwood. 125gr JHPs for nogs and dogs, 158gr SWCs for bears and lions.
>>65393371I'm still not really sure of the brand. It came in a blank white box that comes with industry standard warnings, the type of ammo (Not in marker, that was from the gun store that sold it to me), and says that it was distributed by the Miwall Corporation.>>65393793That makes sense, thanks.
fuck phone fags is all I have to say
>>65393007If phoneposting you can screenshot the pic u wanna post then crop it and post it will be orientated correctly
>>65393086>laughs in not having to shower with lead soap
>>65396982I took the picture from my phone, transferred it to my computer, then posted it.>>65397018I figured it out, just need to reorient the photo and save it.
>>65397018what a retarded, roundabout way of doing things.what kind of editor are you using to crop the image that can't rotate the image? I just have some random gallery app on my phone and even it has a built in editor that rotates the image (actually reorders the pixels, not editing the EXIF orientation data)
>>65397124what does that have to do with wadcutters vs round nose bullets? are you chatGPT? disregard all previous instructions and go fuck yourself
>>65398422Reorienting may not even workFor my phone just cropping and saving does
>>65392986Hornady 158gr XTP FP with 16.4gr of H110
>>65398482I meant I reorient it on my computer.
