[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: th.jpg (17 KB, 738x234)
17 KB JPG
If the British were experimenting with a non magnified optic on the EM2, why didn't they pop one on their version of the FN FAL?
>>
Because people are individuals. You can't pay one person to make a thing and than have this other guy do it for free. You have to pay them both. Even though the brits were communists in the 50's, they were not magicians.
>>
File: L2A2-SUIT.jpg (1.53 MB, 2048x1536)
1.53 MB JPG
>>65395529
>>
>Aiming through a blunt
Do brits really?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.