Why don't we use higher energy propellant in ammunition. It is current year and we're still using powder. You wouldn't even have to increase barrel/receiver strength you could have the same muzzel velocity with lighter ammunition.
>>65395773Why don’t you try using an oxyacetylene mixture as your propellant and tell me what happens to your barrel.
>>65395773>mobile pic>stupid question>poor spelling and grammarkys turdie
>>65395773just make liquid hydrazine propellant riflego ahead itt will lbe graet tfor india/china
>>65395773>You wouldn't even have to increase barrel/receiver strengthDoesn't the new sigger rifle have a barrel life of like 3k rounds or something? And I'm sure that was done with ten minutes to cool between shots.
>>65395773How about I fuck yamudda
>>65395773i am simultaneously disgusted by this woman and wondering what it would actually be like
for me, it's electrically controlled extinguishable solid propellant gyrojets
>>65395824I bet it wouldn't be too bad, shes prolly really freaky just have to get over the bogging
>>65395773I actually had an idea for a bullet loaded with Semtex or something but I'm not enough of an explosives expert to get Semtex or how to make a blasting cap/detonator that would be useable in a gun. Still in the group of ideas like the ultra-shrapnel mine, tazer grenade, and gas operated artillery cannon that I thought of when I was 13.
>>65395854all artillery is gas operated innit
>>65395853>>65395824I'd need a bag, or just hit it from behind.
>>65395893>>65395824cryptid hag witches are not for sex
>>65395881I mean like a semi-automatic howitzer. I used to have a drawing of it but I don't know where it's at.
