[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1687197747901538.jpg (299 KB, 1079x1074)
299 KB JPG
Everything under 7,62mm is basically useless in a war
>>
>>65401347
You're right, but everyone is going to be big mad.
>>
>>65401347
I agree, .308 rifle with .30 super carry sidearm
>>
Body armor is KING
>>
>Autists on an imageboard know more about war than most militaries

Thanks, I never would have known!
>>
>>65401390
If you knew anything about the military, you'd know that they're often wrong.
>>
How, would ya say, most people die in war OP? In wars past artillery accounted for the overwhelming majority of casualties. In war of the long past disease accounted for most of the casualties. In modern wars drones account for most of the casualties. So it doesn't really matter what handheld firearms anyone takes into battle because you're fare more likely to be killed by disease, artillery, or drones and in that case a 22LR double action revolver would be sufficient.
Yes. I would rather go out with a team of dudes slinging 22LR and a manpack radio in contact with dudes slinging 105 and 155 than with a bunch of idiots carrying rifles of any caliber.
>>
>>65401398
Not just often, basically always
>>
>>65401390
And when the people who know from experience and expertise chime in to correct the retards the said retards will ignore the reply and continue shitposting or call them Langley Kikes. Modern contrarians are the fucking wortst because they don't even know (or care) what original contrarianism is, similar to modern day anarchists.
>>
>>65401443
You sound like a hipster.
>>
>>65401347
Depends on the environment.

In the swamp land forests of Eastern and Central Finland, you can spot a moving enemy from 50 meters to 200 meters away.
You can shoot a round at said enemy and expect the bullet hit the first twig at 20 meters to 50 meters away.

Continue shooting.
>>
File: 1627672519475.jpg (135 KB, 794x794)
135 KB JPG
>>65401347
>,
>>
>>65401399
You do still need effective infantry to fix the enemy. Infantry with a weapon with poor lethality and volume of fire (volume of fire being more important) will fail to prevent the maneuver of enemy infantry. Your theoretical dude with a double action 22lr will get his shit rocked by someone with an AK who can constantly put fire on him and close to throw a grenade on him, and then his manpack's no good and his nice position is lost to the enemy.
>>
>>65401347
Then I am under 7.62.
>>
>>65401354
Now I want .309 and .31 Super Carry. This is The Way.
>>
>>65401385
I SHOOT 10MM!
>>
>>65402062
Oh and someone catching a .22lr to a limb might still even be able to walk whereas a SCHV round won't be the case. TLDR there's a reason everyone went to SCHV
>>
>>65401443
>wortst
>>
>>65401347
Why do old people look like this



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.