[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1782111706194617.jpg (34 KB, 640x480)
34 KB JPG
>*solved the drone problem decades ago*
>>
Damn that FPV didn't stand a chance, okay here come 5 more; quick reload it before th-
>>
File: file.png (1.13 MB, 933x479)
1.13 MB PNG
>>65443654
just put more of them
>>
File: 1768782628507654.png (769 KB, 1079x860)
769 KB PNG
>be competent
>solve warfare problem
>>
Metal storm is one of those things that seems cool as fuck when you are 15 but you realize is retarded later.
The stacked round concept does have a couple of practical niche uses but 1 million RPM small arms isn't one of them.
>>
>>65443645
>barrel length changes with each shot
How the fuck does this thing maintain any sort of a zero on target?
>>
>>65443645
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8hlj4EbdsE
>>
>>65443713
accuracy isn't what this thing is meant for
>>
>>65443713
Accuracy through volume.
>>
>>65443713
That could be solved with a different powder charge for each round but that really hurts economics of scale.
>>
>>65443645
wasted tax dollars, someone should be hanged for it
>>
>>65443757
How much did they get in development funding?
It would be worth a couple of mill just for the practical use cases like smoke launchers.
>>
>>65443770
Depends on how much bullshit you want to believe, total 60 million dollars between america and austrialia over the course of twenty years, instead of a lump sum it was awarded in small installments through grants ranging from just under a million to upwards of over 3 million at a time linked to milestones, the company went into administration with significant financial losses
>>
>>65443826
Eh, not terrible as wasted military funding goes, probably worth $5m.
>>
>>65443738
> but that really hurts economics of scale.
I assume ammo would be manufactured in tubes, so not really. If you have a standard barrel length you would have a standard charge of bullets/propellant
Still, a belt fed system is probably just going to be all around better at pretty much everything.
>>
>>65443843
sounded like a vanity project with no practical or functional application, dude this would be so cool...fucking stupid and a waste of resources and time
maybe it can get repurposed and slimmed down for drones
>>
>>65443850
I mean if you have 20 rounds stacked in a single barrel you need 20 different propellant charge sizes if accuracy matters.
Now you are making 20 different charges instead of 1 which drastically increases costs.

>>65443857
Like I said things like vehicle smoke launchers make sense because you don't give a shit about accuracy and getting more shots before the crew has to go outside and reload can be useful.
APS is another one where it could be good.
Small arms just doesn't make any sense at all, there is no advantage.
>>
>>65443891
>Now you are making 20 different charges instead of 1 which drastically increases costs.
I envisioned a machine depositing a measured volume of propellant then pressing into into a 'cake', then inserting the projectile, then repeating rather than the charges being measured and pressed separately and assembled.
>>
>>65443903
Fair, I though you ment cutting pre-pressed grains to length with has issues.
>>
File: vulcan cannon.jpg (244 KB, 1280x939)
244 KB JPG
>>65443645
Probably the worst approach to drone defense imaginable.

>>65443703
I'm convinced its only reason for existing was to be put into Guinness Book Of World Records.

>>65443713
It doesn't, unless you want to go through the heaps of ball-ache that is calculating for and compensating for powder charge to try to make each shot in a barrel as close in velocity as possible.
Also, enjoy regulating those dozens and dozens of barrels together for a point of impact lmao. It's unreal how utterly useless Metal Storm actually was.

>>65443733
It would also be grossly inefficient at volume. There is nothing that this contraption really does that a Gatling gun with a motor doesn't do way better.
We moved away from volley guns a very long time ago, and for good reason, repeating and self-loading designs are comprehensively superior.
>>
>>65443645
>'member Metal Storm?
>'member CornerShot?
>'member the NLOS gun?
>'member LRAD?
>'member airborne lasers?
>'member Dragon Skin?
>'member Land Warrior?
>'member XM8?
>'member XM25?
>Yeeeeaaah! I 'member!
>>
>>65444033
LRAD is still used be civ and mil police, airborne lasers are more a thing now than they were then, and XM25 was just too early but has led to the current generation of shoulder fired automatic grenade launchers.
>>
>>65443826
The U.S has blown WAY more on that on recent Sigslop bullshit.

>>65443850
Or a linkless feed.

>>65444033
LRAD actually amounted to something, and it seems the new PGS thing may be a good continuation on the XM25 after all.
>>
>>65443726
After all these years, this thing is still so cool.
>>
>>65444335
After all these years the *BANG* at 0.53 still gets me
>>
>>65443850
>belt fed metal storm that just feeds in new tubes
imagine the tinnitus
>>
File: hq720 (3).jpg (46 KB, 686x386)
46 KB JPG
>>65443645
Honestly I was also pondering this, how bad would the Typhoon be really? You just ejaculate a million bullets in any given direction and pulp whatever is in the way, as long as the ammo flows you obliterate any drone pretty quick theoretically
>>
>>65444537
you'll spend more money on a new machine after all the barrels are dead than the ammo to reload it.
if you really want a drone defense solution then take a Mk19, chamber it in 4 gauge, give it a longer barrel, put it on a CROWS and voila.
>>
>>65443935
Gatling guns are also fucking horrifically worthless for drone defence. See: recent korean video.
If you're shooting at like, a singular drone, then you can opt for some kind of shotgun or rotary solution. But the moment it's multiple proximity fused shells are the only sane solution.
>>
>>65443713
>How the fuck does this thing maintain any sort of a zero on target?
computerization
>>
>>65443645
MeatStorm solved fuckall, except as a way to funnel scam-bux into the promoter's pockets.
>>
File: file.png (630 KB, 520x780)
630 KB PNG
>>65444033
yep, im thinking its kino
>>
It has potential applications. The large cube/rectangle ones are less practical, but modular tubes that shoot bullets that you can stack together, select various ammo types for, and program different fire rates/ patterns has alot of potential.
Ironically it's actually a great gun for drones to use, you can just but some tubes on the back of your robot dogs, or under your quad copter instead of a clunky rifle made for humans. Easy to switch out calibers and ammo types for different roles.
A 12 gauge version could be great, much lighter and smaller than conventional shotguns, underslung for door breaching, a mini version for that, or fullsized for a fire rate that would make the AA12 look gay.
It's also the perfect gun for space. No moving parts so it can get jammed up with moon dust or martian soil. lots of options with exotic ammo types to use in it, etc.

It truly was ahead of its time and the Metalstorm will be featured in future conflicts
>>
>>65444335
Hell yeah it is. To hear it go from a regular gun sound, to a buzz or roar that surpasses even the minigun, to coming back around to sounding like a gun at max ROF is too cool for words.
>>
>>65444578
>See: recent korean video.
Not to justify the retardation of that video and how dumb the worsties were to put it out but it is deceptive.

The guns were locked into fixed positions with zero aiming whatsoever, they just pointed them in a fixed direction and flew the drones into the area of fire.
>>
>>65444883
what was his background again?
>>
>>65446220
looks like clear skies, dense tree lines, and a flat plain



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.