[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1773503604747534.jpg (424 KB, 1080x1038)
424 KB JPG
Finally made it onto the range after an 8 month hiatus. Fired some guns I've owned for a while just to regain a little proficiency and two new ones including picrel. 38 special out of this is completely reasonable but 357 feels like it is overkill unless someone is actively on top of you. What a strange caliber for a tiny gun
>>
>>65456703
Its just so its a tank for .38, i imagine the old treasury loads would be great in it. Not so brutal as .357 but plenty of power for a 125-158 grain bullet
>>
>>65456703
I've got a smith and wesson .357 airweight (made out of scandium), with a 2" barrel and pretty much that grip. I've personally replaced the grip with Hogue overmold, and only fired .357 magnum (which is what it is designed for) out of it once. It's carry load is .357 magnum, but I will NOT practice with .357 magnum out of that platform.
I am a 240 lb muscular firearm enthusiast, and I will happily tell you, without any hesitation, that it is a fine platform for .38 special.

Still, if I don't really have other options, it's nice to know I'm prepared to stop most threats I might encounter inside Florida. A 1911 does a wonderful job as well, but in the middle of the summer heat, a lightweight gun is the far better option.
>>
>>65456730
Why not practice 357 mag out of it? My experience has redpilled me to carrying it with 38 specials only, maybe I'll roll 357 in the future but it seems way too unwieldy for follow up shots and any actual aiming, though I understand the snubby isn't exactly a distance gun
>>
>>65456703
The fireball will stun him
>>
>>65456703
I want one in .327, I like the idea of an extra round with a little extra oomph
>>
>>65456753
Theyve been unobtainium lately, wonder when theyll do another run after they just did some sp101s recently, ill definitely nab one
>>
>>65456758
>Theyve been unobtainium lately,
that's lame and gay. ruger should also make a redhawk in .327 for shits and giggles
>>
Whats the 357 load for nin scandium snubs anyway? 158g sjhp? Or literal "medium" 357 loads with wwb hp
>>
>>65456753
I was seriously considering grabbing one in 22 and still might. 8 rounds of 22 in a self defense load is pretty based imo, you could plink those down with god tier precision and if one happens to not fire it just hops the cylinder to the next round
>>65456793
Idk man I was rushing at the LGS and just grabbed a couple boxes of whatever was cheapest, my load for this trip was 158 grain FMJ and I've got one or two boxes of some other shit locked up
>>
If you befriend or become a handloader, you can get .357 rounds sending a 125-gr hollow point at 1050 fps for lower recoil (while probably keeping expansion). No need to send full-power magnum loads in a lightweight revolver.
>>
>>65456703
Would rather just have the 38 special version of the LCR because it's lighter.
Don't see myself ever shooting 357 out of a lightweight snubnose. Seems masochistic and not in the fun sexy way.
>>
>>65456703
.357 out of these isn't fun
>>
>>65456861
You have to be uncommonly strong to be able to handle it.

Anyone know the velocity gain on .38vs.357 out of a 2” bbl? With the flash it can’t be worth the recoil
>>
>>65456899
I wouldn’t say that. Rather I’d say that’s all it is.
>>
>>65456915
i mean it in the way that if you have other guns there isn't a reason to pick this over any other experience, and most people that like guns have at least three or four
>>
>>65456918
It’s like wearing corrective lenses. Imagine the forearm gainz.
>>
>>65456783
They did a super redhawk in 22 hornet lol
>>
>>65456730
>platform
>fat
>faggot
>>
>>65456703
They're making them because people are buying them. Those people presumably don't shoot them very much in .357, if at all. Or they just like an overly heavy .38. Not sure really.
>t. carry one in 9mm
>tried +p+ exactly once, do not recommend
>>
File: 1765980700580695.jpg (11 KB, 236x194)
11 KB JPG
>>65457716
What compels a person to obtain a revolver in 9milly
>>
>>65458396
I imagine they want a revolver and want cheap ammo.
>>
>>65458396
>already have it
>already load it
>full moon clips are a feature, not a bug
Simple as. If you're asking why a revolver instead of an autoloader, I have one of those too. The revolver's a bit lighter and IMO more appropriate for carrying in a jacket pocket.
>>
>>65456747
practicing with .357 is silly. 38 Special is for fun and practice. .357 mag is what you keep loaded in case you need to kill someone
>>
>>65459327
>not practicing with your carry ammo
>not carrying 148 grain lead wadcutters in your snubnose 38 special
>>
>>65456753
>>65456758
The SP101 in .327 is just about perfect, but I feel anything smaller would get unwieldy.
>>65456783
They did a 7 shot GP100 and an 8 shot Blackhawk, but yeah a Redhawk would be cool.
>>
File: 20260824_212415.jpg (1.42 MB, 2696x1797)
1.42 MB JPG
>>65460516
Whoops, forgot my image.
>>
>>65460516
2" LCR, 3" SP101, 4" 7 shot gp100, 8 shot 5 or 6" redhawk would be great
>>
>>65460524
>8 shot 5 or 6" redhawk would be great
redhawk already holds 8 .357, I'd imagine you be able to squeeze at least one more .327 in there
>>
>>65460566
9 or 10 then



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.