Honest thoughts on this helicopter?
Literally a Temu Blackhawk.
>>65465948zero action = zero thoughts
>>65465948it's something that chinks copied from actual humans again so probably garbage.
>>65465948>brack hok
It's a piece of shit
raped by saw gunners
>>65465948>Black Hawk at home
>>65465948Honestly... the more I look at it, the more I see how its different from a uh-60, like Chang wanted a helo that does exactly what the blackhawk does, more than wanting the blackhawk itself.. if that makes any sense.
Why do Chinese people have zero creativity ?At least the Russians come up with unique ideas and designs even if they can’t match up with US hardware they still have sovlChina literally just copies shamelessly every time
>>65467353>if that makes any sense.I'd say it does, though the shitposting teenagers will probably have no issues not getting the difference.
>>65467356because chinese must always copy, cheat and lie to "win", this litterally ruined them for entire generations to come, they litterally can't be themselves, they must ALWAYS copy the one winning in order to try to take his place.
>>65467356>>65467371Not to sound like an implessiv' poster, but genuinely why wouldnt they? Nobody's going to stop trading with them over it, so they dont really have a reason to stop
>>65465948Literally a Better Blackhawk.
>>65467422because a copy doesnt surpass the original at best its equal. then the designers dont know why things are done how they were done. if they have to iterate or improve they are years behind.they will never be the best or cutting edge.for example somebody has a recipe then it turns out that one of the people is allergic to x ingredient. somebody who actually knows the recipe could easily substitute an acceptable replacement. or tweak ratios and still make good food.meanwhile guy who googled the recipe and blindly uses it has no fucking clue what to change.
>>65467353If you know the origin of the blackhawk then you understand why nobody would build an airframe around the same limitations, even if its near identical.
>>65467353>>65467359Shut the fuck up chang. And stop samefagging.
>>65467475Im not even a Z-20 defender, but this is flawed on multiple levels, most glaringly the notion that copying something makes it inherently inferior. >That analogy Chyna didnt simply go off stolen blueprints, they bought a fleet of modernized(For the 80s) S-70s, and went off of that. I'm not saying the Z-20 is better than the Uh-60, but taking someone else's idea and refining/implementing complementary concepts is about 95% of all human development.>>65467518>airframe around the same limitations, even if its near identical.What limitations? Other than the ones that are inherent to medium lift helos in general. The UH-60 platform is about as min-maxed as you can get in that area
>>65467588>but taking someone else's idea and refiningIf its a copy, there are no refinements... because its a copy.
Another chink turd
>>65467371what is chinese izzat called?
>>65467591It's clearly not a 1:1 copy tho, different airframe, engines, and overall dimensions. Thats not to say it has better physical performance, but adapted to fit better in chang's MIC for better implementation
>>65467356Why reinvent the wheel? All designs come to the same conclusions because physics are the same everywhere. Copy to save time reaching a certain point, after that start trying to innovate to go beyond. Also fuck china, goddamn commies.
>>65467621Face
>mom can we have sikorsky>we have sikorsky at home
