Is this correct?
>>65469596the Su-35 part seems like something some 50cent army chink drew on their as an after thought.
>>65469596It is correct. And the redpill is that the F-104 line has always been the way to go since the early days of aerial warfare. Speed is life and the ability to control the engagement and bug out a your desire is king.Everything else is just for show.
>>65469596yes, the Su-35 does airshow tricks in the same spot, thus having no energy left to evade the AIM-9 about to kill it
>>65469637it literally happened
>>65469596The famous Russian cope induced delusions.
>>65469596I see an image showing the flight path of a crashing SU-35 after being hit by an AIM-9 launched by the F-16 which is now turning to watch it go down. The F-4 is also turning but preferring to stay closer to the camera so we can admire its beauty, and the F-104 thought about taking a look but heard there were German pilots still alive and decided to bug out and deal with that first.
>>65469709None.
>>65469596Not sure what I am looking at? Is this meant to show that the SU-35 has disintegrated after an intercept?
>>65469596Russian way of thinking in a nutshell. There is always a crumb of truth "SU-35 can do that" but its covered in levels of self delusion either to cover up failures or to inflate their ego. "SU-35 can do that AND its actually useful!".
>>65469722Prove it to be a lie then, surely you are capable of such a simple task?
>>65469749>r*ssian arguing that F-16 actually is better than Su-35nigga you're nuts
>>65469596Yes, the flanker would be stuck in a flat spin.No, the F-16 would not turn laterallyNo, the F-4 would not have a white contrailThe 'super maneuver' bullshit makes you slow and requires afterburner to recover from, which makes you extremely tasty in the eyes of a sidewinder. But russians aren't that stupid. They would not use those tactics in actual combat. Especially against a plane that has a HMD.
>>65469722>Proven truth.FTFY. Seethe more about it, nekulturniy pidor.
>>65469800Okay. My research shows that not a single F-16 had to be sacrificed to slaughter this russian shitbird, yet agian showing the absolute superiority of western aircraft over zigger garbage. Prove me wrong, barbarian.
>>65469811You were proven wrong and moved the goalpost like the cum/chug/ger you are, but now you've made a claim a SU-35 has shot down a F-16 so prove it.
>>65469670Skill issue, Russia didn't send their best pilot.
>>65469811>What I meant to ask was how many F-16 have been shot down by SU-35 before that one accident?None.
>>65469811>What I meant to ask was how many F-16 have been shot down by SU-35 before that one accident?Zero. Keep seething.
>>65469850More like their best pilot wouldn't be shot down because he would flee at the sight of the venerable Fighting Falcon on his radar warning receiver
>>65469876>on his radar warning receiverimplying this shit would id the plane instead of blaring false positives like always
>>65469881This isn't a videogame anon. The Fighting Falcon is putting you in a single target track and you are getting cancer.
>>65469850Das right, monke model pilot
This thread is a humiliation ritual for slavaboos.
>>65469932Everything is a humiliation ritual for slavaboos in 2026.>TanksHumiliation ritual>PlanesHumiliation ritual>Infantry equipmentHumiliation ritual>RadiosHumiliation ritual>Air defenseHumiliation ritual>Ballistic missilesHumiliation ritual>Petrol stationsHumiliation ritual>E-commerceHumiliation ritual>Central banksHumiliation ritual>VotingHumiliation ritual>FarmingHumiliation ritual>VodkaHumiliation ritualIt's just humiliation rituals, all the way down. Even their porn is terrible now, because Russian women who are meant to be famously beautiful have gone all in on mar a logo face, lip fullers like a pair of bratwursts stuck to the face.
>>65469596
>>65469596BVR is the current meta
For demonstrative purposes, yes. Practically? Not really.
Russian jets, have a "cool" factor that western equivalents dont simply because each loss is pretty much irreplaceable. Like killing an endanger species, each kill has a real finality to it, and like an endangered species one or two new ones might be produced, but not in a number that makes a real difference in their inevitable extinction.
>>65470052>each loss is pretty much irreplaceableWtf are you talking about? Su-35 is still in production, retard. Unlike F-22...
>>65470110May we see these F-22 losses?
>>65469788>They would not use those tactics in actual combatI do agree, but on the other hand you wouldn't even think of using that unless you were well and truly fucked so the chance of a last ditch cobra maneuver getting hilariously dunked on by a sidewinder in full HD isn't completely out of the picture if shit goes hot. As long as I see that before the nukes go off I can die happy.
>>65469708>and the F-104 thought about taking a look but heard there were German pilots still alive and decided to bug out and deal with that first.My fucking sides
>>65470110Even the Fighting Falcon rapes the SU-35, why do they need F-22s? It seems they overestimated Sukhoi.
>>65469596add firing all AA missiles onboard. In BF2 the FB-35 was trash against the J-10. The only way I could compete was drastic altitude transitions, and out of the blue engagements, which was basically firing all my AA missiles, and deviating back to the original transition movement pattern. Reload if I make it back and repeat.
>>65469850Ukies only had F16s for like 2 years so they didn't even have time to grow top pilots. This makes it like 10x more embarrassing for ziggers
>>65470364>Museum staff has said the recent uncovering of a live bullet inside a World War Two tank "stopped us in our tracks".d
Oh shit, vatnikbot is leaking again
>>65470391You guys do understand that there are sales restrictions on ammunition in every country and letting random kids play unsupervised with live ammo especially in a museum environment where it's presumed that most things have been kid-vetted is generally considered a Bad Idea outside your weird gun hobbyist echo chambers right?
>>65469850post best pilot
