Suppose the US didn't step into the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict, and the war continued to escalate. Who would've won if Pakistan or India attempted to take control of the entire Kashmir region? Based on military equipment, known capabilities, etc
Paki’s would win the aerial war for sure.For some reason those guys spend like 90% of their GDP on their Air Force backed by China.But the land war idk
>Who would've wonthe rest of the world
>>65476366This is a laughable question, India would drag Pakistan around like a wet rag on the floor. Militarily yes, India could obliterate Pakistani positions and annihilate their presence in Kashmir, but it's highly possible Pakistan would sue for peace after a few more days of fighting so their army could stay intact (perhaps to deal with rebels on Balochistan)
>>65476400This
>>65476366I just wished that both nuked each other, imagine the benefits of having no more Indians in this planet
>>65476366>Suppose the US didn't step into the 2025 India-Pakistan conflictUS stepped into the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict?
>>65476366>>65476408Now let's talk about how could've they dragged China into this.
>>65476421lol
>>65476366>Who would've wonThe rest of the world, as long as tons of them die.
>>65476421> By a stroke of chance, one of India's Soviet era radars is powered on to heat a pot of sorghum on the old soviet generator's radiator.> Ensign Radesh looks up from his lunch to see the Paki missiles coming in> Forgot the codes for his radio, so he snapchats his senior command.> Of the 38 diligent officers assigned to respond, 37 of them see the snapchat message next to their feeds of bobs and vagene.> In a record time of 18 minutes, the signal to launch is given by the Indian strategic missile command.> In a dark, fetid silo that smells pungently of BO and feces, ancient generators hum to life and the doors slowly creak open.>Shiva's merciless hand guides a dozen (out of 300) missiles out their silos successfully, streaking toward Lahore.>One perfectly aimed missile manages to land 6km from the city center, wracking terrible damage to the cheap textile capital of the subcontinent.>By divine providence, only a single Pakistani warhead lands in the sea outside Mumbai. >no deaths from the blast, but the resulting poo-nami drowns 1,546 people.>PM Modi praises the quick response of the Indian armed forces and both sides draw back from the brink of war.
>>65476500That's pretty funny, but in reality the Indian response would be much faster. Pakistan would get flattened and no one even tries to dispute this
>>65476516Prove it, rapejesh
>>65476416As a third party diplomat? Idek
Do the pakis have the capability to scud hunt jeet mobile launchers and sink their boomers?Or are both sides likely purely focused on counter value cock punching their respective major population centers so the question is not applicable?
>>65476366>Suppose the US didn't step into the 2025 India-Pakistan conflictWhen did they do that?
>>65476366India would win a Pyrrhic victory having suffered major losses and humilation.
>>65476704Trump talked to both sides and convinced them to stop fighting. There was no US military involvement
>>65476402>This is a laughable question, India would drag Pakistan around like a wet rag on the floorit would be the first time an Indian ever cleaned anything
>>65476767Imagine believing this.
>>65476902
Not sure if this thread was made to bait the jeet shills into exposing themselves or something else
>>65476366Long term maybe a nuclear war witch you know would be a win win because it'd be better for every one if both sides were glassed. But most likely they would of made peace before anything cool happened.
>>65476999If you're hoping a nuclear war would result in the destruction of India and Pakistan, see >>65476421
>>65477140Poolands nuke niggers probably about as competent as their pilots (or any other subhuman from that subcontinent for that matter).
>>654771551) India has proven it's competence in fighter pilots against Pakistan numerous times since 1947.2) Even if Indian pilot quality was not good, India has a nuclear TRIAD which also includes ground launched and submarine launched missiles
>>65477191can you denounce vishnu for me real quick
>>65477202Back to pol with you
>>65477242outed
>>65477247I'm Canadian you stupid bastard
>>65476366Pakistan has strategic value again due to its issues with Iran and war with Afghanistan. We should be using them to create a humanitarian crisis/famine in Afghanistan to punish them for not resisting the Taliban, but US is useless these days.
>>65477249not beating the jeet allegations
>>65477249Now you're just trolling lol.>>65477155India has been consistently winning against pakistan in recent days. They still have their problems (like denying air losses in 2025) but I'd rate India as the likely winner over pakistan in any throwdown.
>>65476366pakistan
>>65476366Despite near parity in atomic numbers India could win a nuclear exchange with Pakistan, at most it would only be be 100 million or so dead and that assumes a Pakistani first strike with their entire arsenal. That number would be much less if India hit first, maybe 25 million which is 1/60th the population. Kashmir is a gain of around 16 million so the net overall loss would roughly equal India's yearly losses from natural causes, about 9 million. Wow, 18 million out of 1.5 billion, big fucking deal.It is a rounding error on their yearly census and since most of the surviving nukes Pakistan would be able to use are incapable of hitting the richer southern portion of India it would be a net gain. Since the dead and those suffering long term losses would be mostly poor and unlikely to get decent government healthcare anyway no one cares. If the funds needed to deter Pakistan were spent instead on infrastructure then combined with exploiting the resources of the new Pakistani region of India a mere decade or so of extermination and resource recovery operations would see a net Indian GDP increase, this would more than offset the minor loss of life. It would be a net quality of life gain for the Indian populace, well worth the comparatively minor doubling of net deaths for one year.There is a very strong argument to be made that it is unethical for India to NOT launch a surprise nuclear attack, as guardians of their people's well being it is unethical not to do so.
>>65476421I expect half of any missiles India launches to miss their targets or explode prematurely, also I expect half their claimed inventory is inoperable or nonexistent.
>>65476799Checked and kekked.
>>65476799
>>65477387Which is better than Pakistan's which is based on missile and warhead technology which the DPRK declared obsolete 20+ years ago. India has a verified ability to use hydrogen fusion devices via submarine, with MIRVs no less. Pakistan is the only nuclear power besides Israel that ranks below the DPRK and is only arguably Israel tier because Pakistan (probably) has demonstrated a basic boosted fission device. They probably rank below Israel as even Israel can (probably) deliver a submarine launched nuclear cruise missile while Pakistan lacks even that, if not for a decent number of warheads they would be in the former joke tier of South Africa.
>>65477456have the Indian navy learned to close their hatches before submerging yet?
>>65477811I would assume that since they operate four nuclear armed ballistic missile submarines the answer is yes:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arihant-class_submarine
>>65476366India has such a massive logistical advantage that it'd be insane if they lost against Pakistan. Considering both are societally fucked but not completely inept militarily, it'd probably be real bloody but I can't not see India winning on size alone.
>>65477868As i already mentioned an Indian nuclear first strike would probably lose India 1/60th of it's population over a decade and result in total Pakistani obliteration, they are idiots for not having done it already. India has bad leadership, no one beside Pakistan will respond to an Indian nuclear first strike. The moment they blast Pakistan with a couple of H-Bombs the world would quietly applaud them.
>>65477456>verified ability to use hydrogen fusion devicesI thought that was in question and they might be stuck at boosted fission like the pakis are.But ofc when it comes to any information on subcontinental shenanigans there's a huge amount of skin right way.I generally agree though, possible institutional incompetence aside, india looks to be on a better footing for nuclear war than pakistan.But I think China might get a little freaky at night over an Indian first strike
>>65476366>Who would've wonHumanity
What happens if I said India has no chance in Hell of winning any conflict it gets itself into, especially with Pakistan?
>>65478538Then you'd be retarded, because they've won every conflict they've had with Pakistan since 1947. Granted it's jeet on jeet violence, but you'd still be retarded.
