How will this help future military aviation design?
>>65492810I was told the main use-case was in making sure artificial hearts synced properly with the body.
Not much. The interest in such problems rarely has much to do with the solutions themselves. The real utility usually comes from the techniques involved.And read Terry Tao's blog first. Let the specialists verify the solution first.Faggot.
>>65492810doesn't affect anything, this is just theoretical handwaving about whether or not the equations break down at some point. they proved they do, but they don't for basically any practical aerospace problem. they also only looked at incompressible flows, which are, for the most part, mostly irrelevant in military aviation, so even if the conditions under which the breakdown occurs is relevant in some way, the applicability would've been low, limited to mostly only combustor dynamics (and you'd have to be making some really fucking stupid assumptions about it), except the limiting factor in simulations there is the multi-domain multi-phase combustion sim that's a pain in the ass to get right.there is AI used in fluid dynamics for military projects, don't get me wrong, but it's mostly in the form of them doing (part) of the turbulence dynamics within the sim. this kind of mathematical theory hubbulubba doesn't really have immediate applications to the field.
>>65492810So... it takes this long to award the Millennium Prize to the Millennium Challenge? Apologize!
>>65492810>OpenAI>AI notorious for making false claims marketed by CEO notorious for making false claimsyeah no
These equations remain un'solved'.Bullshit PR campaign for the AI financial scam
>>65492810>AI>>>/g/>>>/r/eddit
>>65492810The AI solved it in the same way that Google's AI gave a correct answer about waffle stomping.
>>65492810INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER
>>65492810In this case, not really. But it should be a wakeup for the people who think AI's a nothingburger.
>>65493327It's already been revealed that the AI illegally harvested data from research put into a cloud. NEVER trust the cloud.
>>65493209Well this one might be legit. Because they fucking stole the research of actual mathematicians who were using their system.
>>65493346This, despite the researcher stating they weren’t accusing anyone, the timing of OpenAI’s “discovery” immediately after his group’s solution and the subsequent threats toward the researcher by OpenAI leave little doubt they stole his work via data theft. I hope academia and every mathematician of note boycotts OpenAI.
>>65493372It's not theft when the terms of service explicitly state that anything you put into their AI is their property.
>>65493315Grock....please... Its been 10^1100 years. How much more time do you need?
>>65493346>>65493372Oh it's so much better than that. He asked them if they trained the model that solved it on his chats and they refused to answer. Twice.>>65493514Terms of service don't have any bearing on the natural language meaning of "theft" in the context of stealing an idea or credit for something. The point here is not really whether OpenAI has a legal entitlement to use his proof, the question it raises is how much you can read into the proof about the progress of AI. There is a titanic difference between asking an AI for a solution to a Navier-Stokes case and it selecting an obscure route and reasoning it through to a proof, and you giving an AI the problem and all of the messy pieces of a proof and then getting it to tidy the proof up. The latter is what appears to have happened, but the former is what it's being presented as.
>>65493313lol, google's ai mode is fantastic now, as long as it has decent source material
>>65493514>It's not theft when the terms of service explicitly state that anything you put into their AI is their property.eeh i doubt that's enforceable. that's like microsoft saying they own all the intellectual property that office 365 touches.
>>65493209I fucking hate AI but it is finally being useful in the field of maths, because it can read and memorize millions of papers it is making discoveries that humans have been working on for decades.It's also producing formalization (writing code to execute existing mathimatical proofs) much faster than humans which is allowing people to double check it's work quickly.
>>65493738it really isn't
>>65492810it will not
>>65492810well to put a long story short, this specific problem won't do much in the moment, but it's emblematic of just how much AI has improved in the past few yearsbasically, if it keeps improving at this rate, and eventually begins to do similar improvements in biology and material sciences, the US will exponentially explode in terms of scientific capacity and outputin other words, hyperborean FTL engines by 2035.
>>65493738>decent source materialI suppose this excludes most of the interweb as of 2026? Swear half the search results for nearly anything are AI slop generated by a jeet marketing company, with an Amazon affiliate link buried somewhere on the page in hopes the user will accidentally click it.The quality of search results is massively improved by blocking anything made after 2024 or so.Wish there was some effort to filter out this subhuman garbage, but I suppose that effort would get overwhelmed quickly by AI bots, too.
>>65492810it won't
