[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Regarding a certain event in the early 21st century which we are approaching the anniversary of: What missiles available 25 years ago could theoretically be uh, modified to resemble a passenger plaim? [spoiler]Just talk about missiles please, there's really nowhere else I know of to discuss this.[/spoiler]
>>
Also if I seem kind of cagey it's so the scrapers don't summon Those Who Shine to derail the bread.
>>
>>65493769
The black taxi driver who was parked in front of the five sided building, said there wasn't a disguise. He committed suicide shortly after the interview.
>>
File: 1755972829341385.png (454 KB, 748x749)
454 KB PNG
Shut the fuck up and take your meds. And stop looking outside.
>>
File: @sf2.jpg (195 KB, 850x1200)
195 KB JPG
>>65493941
but 9/11 is coming
>>
Any plane is a missile: it's all in how you use it.
>>
>>65497260
Wrong, any missile is a plane and it doesn't matter how you use it.
>>
Why would it be missiles and not simply radio controlled 747s? That's cheaper and less conspicuous. Also has anyone noticed how all these conspiracy theories about 9/11 basically stopped when the boomers started dying en masse from covid?
>>
>>65497368
Everyone with half a brain knows the real conspiracy is that the planes were hijacked and crashed into the towers with the knowledge and assistance of American, Israeli, and Saudi intelligence.
>>
The problem is that it there are so many different groups even within the US intelligence community that were all working different cases to where you can both argue it was and wasn't an inside job with no way to decide which is correct. I know it gets compared to Pearl Harbor a lot and there are a lot of similarities with the situation. In both cases, we knew something was coming, but ultimately failed to prepare or stop the exact thing. IIRC the FBI or NSA was heavily profiling some of the individuals, but the CIA was hoping to get one of them to turn on his roommate or turn on his roommate? It's possible that other teams had goals of drawing out higher up figures that might have required letting some stuff go through like the Coventry bombing in WWII to hide the enigma. I do genuinely believe that no one actually thought it would incur that many casualties though. The towers deliberately used a less centrally-strengthened construction but a part of me also thinks that even if the questionable explosives were planted in preparation for a less casualty intense attack, it became "we have to implode the tower right now or else there is a chance they will fall outwards and fuck up the streets/people and make it 100x worse, we cant wait for anyone else to evacuate." As far as 93 goes, if we did shoot it down, I understand why we would, and I understand why people would take knowledge of that to their grave. For the Pentagon, that one just feels like a target of opportunity a la Oklahoma City to get rid of some slush fund evidence and has always been the least studied due to obvious reasons. Honestly gun to my head on Pentagon specific conspiracy theories, it would be a cruise missile w/ a body kit.

That being said just like mass casualty events, I find it more plausible that TPTB would be willing to let innocent people die vs an elaborate construction of fake identities & planes, rather did anyone deliberately let it proceed without stopping it?
>>
>I wanted the attacks to be fake, so I made up a bunch of shit after the fact, now you have to treat my narrative like it's remotely plausible.
No.
>>
Come on you guys, you're supposed to be the weapons history nerds! That's why I asked about early 21st century available missiles here! Do I really have to *shudders* spend actual money on a coffee table book and do my own research?
>>65497368
I remember reading in the James Fetzer book that the 747s in the official narrative weren't taken off some list of active aircraft until years later. Iirc it also named the model of missile that would've worked but ofc I ain't got that book no more b/c I had to move homes suddenly.
>>
>>65497365
But how does it know where it is?
>>
>>65497929
They didn’t use 747s

But also, no cruise missile would ever be confused with a large airliner. The different in size is way too great.
>>
>>65493769
There were plane parts in the rubble, and 4 jets and all their passengers are unaccounted for. They even found a landing gear from one of them wedged in between buildings years later. Not to mention thousands of witnesses, ATC data, and all the videos of the first two planes colliding with the buildings. I don’t understand where this missile thing comes from. There are weird parts of the official narrative (only one poor quality video of the Pentagon attack, and the terrorist passport falling on the ground outside the WTC after the plane hit lmao), but the real conspiracy is the incompetence of our intelligence agencies (not sharing info between them due to rivalries) and Saudis and Israel knowing more than they let on.
>>
>>65498573
Probably Integrals and Derivatives.
>>
>>65493769
>modified to resemble a passenger plane?
If you don't care about size, a wing kit will do well enough. If you care about authenticity you can modify a passenger jet to carry cargo.
>>
>>65498663
If you don't think the Bush family, who had decades of history with both the Saudi and bin Laden families and glow out the wazoo.
>>
>>65498663
>>65498803
oops, forgot the end that sentence
>If you don't think the Bush family, who had decades of history with both the Saudi and bin Laden families and glow out the wazoo,
then you're retarded
>>
File: IMG_6114.jpg (29 KB, 646x474)
29 KB JPG
>>65498806
That sentence still doesn’t make any sense, so I wouldn’t be calling anyone retarded if I was you.
>>
>>65498728
op here again, I remember reading somewhere that the wingspan of the second plane was less than that of a 747 if you measured it against the distances between the windows of the tower. I'd check the video myself and post a screenshot with a little diagram but I'm lazy. Point is, the size not matching would certainly lengthen the list of possible missile types, methinks. Or non-missile types, if >>65498598 is right.
>>
>>65493777
Checked and keked.
>>
>>65499083
> that the wingspan of the second plane was less than that of a 747
That’s probably because they didn’t use 747’s, you fucking retard.
>>
>>65498680
>missed the joke
>but that's OK



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.