Sig is basically expensive PSA at this point. Am i wrong?
>>65559793Fuck SIGFuck yamudda
PSA doesn't shoot on its own
>>65559793One arms Americans. One robs Americans.
>>65559807very true lol
PSA>pay modest amount of money>get a decent rifleSIG>pay large amount of money>femoral artery ruptures
>>65559793Maybe, but I can get two Daggers for the price of a P320 and the Dagger won't try to kill me.
>>65559793Sig doesn’t fix or redesign their dangerously broken guns that they scammed the US Gov withPSA has more options and spare parts by a mile with the stated intention to arm every American
>>65559793PSA has unironically better quality control for their guns.
>>65559793Yes. PSA openly and honestly makes cheap weapons that serve pretty much what you'd expect.SIG makes expensive weapons that fail to match up to even what you'd expect of PSA.
>>65559793How dare you slander such a respective company by putting them in the same image as some shady, fly by night operation. Apologize to PSA.
do you guys think the 385 is going to be as dangerous to handle as the P320 or nah
>>65560966The 385 is supposedly using a modified 365 FCU. I haven't done any research so don't know what safety system its using exactly
>>65560966time will tell
>>65560966i dont think it will be dangerous in the gun goes off unexpectedly but it see it having random parts breakage at high enough but still relatively low roundcounts. like good enough to make it 1k but multiple things broke before 5k with no idea why.
>>65561459Probably this. It would be curious if it has the same teething issues like firing pin dragging that 365 had or have they learned from their mistakes.
