[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HUgP6x9XEAA-iru.jpg (95 KB, 700x518)
95 KB JPG
At the research institute in Kubinka, a Leopard 2A6 was fired upon. This can be inferred from the footage in the Krasnaya Zvezda article “A Scientific Approach Strengthens the Armor of Russian Tanks” for the current month.

What was the catch? Earlier, in the GABTU digest they wrote: “The tank’s resistance to projectiles and shaped-charge (cumulative) rounds, according to a preliminary computational-analytical assessment (JSC UKBTM), is comparable to that of the T-72B developed in 1985.”

But apparently they did not really believe this very much, and besides, not firing at a modern Western tank when you have one available is completely absurd; therefore, in 2026 they recommended: “to carry out a full-scale experiment to assess the projectile resistance of the Leopard 2A6 tank.”
>>
>>65586652
what was the result?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.