[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Does US weaponry work well outside the US military?
>inb4 Israel and Ukraine
I feel like the sucess of those wielders has more to do with the incompetence of their foes than the superiority of US arms
>examples of users of American weaponry
>Saudis
>Afghans
>Pakis
>South Koreans
>South Vietnamese
>Argies
>>
inane thread
>>
File: 1763753131391219.jpg (50 KB, 575x620)
50 KB JPG
>are good weapons good?
>>
>>65611169
No, bombs and bullets don’t work sorry
>>
>>65611169
No, US weapons are designed to be used by US Army that have large logistic capabilities which mean they can afford the high maintenance cost.

For thirdies and rebel, US weapon is not preferable because the high maintenance cost duh...
>>
The Gulf War was actually a pretty good matchup of American vs Soviet military equipment. Obviously the USA went in with an advantage, but Saddam had more than enough in his arsenal that it shouldn't have been the one-sided slaughter it was. If you can win a conventional war so hard that your enemy spends the next few decades complaining that your killing of armed combatants was a war crime, I think you have the right to say your equipment is good.

dogshit thirdie thread btw
>>
>>65611241
For more things hidden by evil HATO, visit incel slave z
>>
>>65611169
Considering the dogshit training standards of the US Army the weapons probably work much better outside of the US military.
>>
File: 1789473412966.png (66 KB, 782x738)
66 KB PNG
>>65611344
Oh? As opposed to which nation's training standards, exactly? Please, do explain
>>
>>65611169
>the sucess of those wielders has more to do with the incompetence of their foes than the superiority of [thing]

This describes every war to have ever been fought
>>
File: Eugene Stoner.jpg (1.91 MB, 1400x1881)
1.91 MB JPG
>>65611169
well consider that the primary service rifle of practically every country on the planet is now an AR-15 or AR-18 derivative, and most of those AR-18 derivatives are getting swapped for AR-15 derivatives
fucking Russia is fielding DI AR-15s now, the only people with AK platform rifles are American enthusiasts, ex-soviet civilians, and third-world countries too poor to replace them with AR-15s
>>
>>65611169
all US weaponry has a kill-switch that activates when insufficient levels of HFCS are detected in the user
>>
>>65611169
Taliban seems to be using it fine; they wouldn't ditch their Soviet plunder for American gear and their decades of experience with it on a whim



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.