Im in the market for a .327(or .32h&r) j frame size revolver, which of these would be "best"?>LCR>s&w 632/432>taurus 327Theyre all roughly the same size, roughly the same profile and can all handle +p .32 which is more than enough, though the taurus can handle proper .327 loads. The LCR to me is the most appealing but theyre stopping production of it and its tough to find them even used, where the taurus and s&w are pretty abundantly available new and used
>>65613423As someone who's owned all three, get the LCR if you can find one and you're willing to pay for it. The Taurus 327 is fine if you want access to .327 and don't mind the extra weight.The S&W has the worst QC, and the sights are terrible, IMO. The sights they put on them are just not intuitive to use.
>>65613447Why has smith fallen so far in the revolver game? Their autoloaders are pretty good, why cant they keep the same quality for them?