Biggest over-embellishers in the US Military
>>65614225>heh yeah I’m totes “le ghost army” like ww2 >did nothing but drop comic strips since the gulf war
>>65614225My vote is for the SEALs, inept but get all of the movies and shows so the general populace cooms over them.
>>65614236Nah, SEALs are fine and competent and their ops are badass, just obnoxious tell-all queers after their service
>>65614225Depends on the war, Psyops and Civil Affairs were your best assets during GWOT
>>65614236You got to modify your expectations of them. They're not SOF. They're basically fanatical stormtroopers. America's version of suicide bombers or Jap banzai chargers.
>>65614236SEALs are fine, the problem is the post service attention whoring after they realize getting a job is difficult
I'm tired of hearing about SEALs. Ever since the whole Bin Laden thing, media acts like they're the hottest shit. I remember back when the go-to cool spec ops team was Delta Force.
i think the biggest over embellisher are the UK army. The UK navy is really goodall of chinas military is pretty shit russian flyers are all old men in their 50s and they fly pieces of shit with no maintenance they are superior to any russian navy or army. australian and canadian army are over exaggerated as well.
>>65614537>australian and canadian army are over exaggerated as well.B-but muh based 100+ year old war crimes
>>65614537This bong calling China's military shit while simping for the Royal Navy is genuinely comical, you can't even manage to give your carriers full air complements and only barely have enough escorts to protect them.
Nah. Rule Brittania, Brittania rules the waves.
>>65614621You can't even spell Britannia correctly Rajesh.
>>65614537>all of chinas military is pretty shitJajajajaja!!Get a hold of this retard.
>>65614418Civil affairs got everyone killed