https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0mnp8fMAuIShame what seemed to be a promising channel has decided to stoop to this level of discourse. (heavy air quotes) This has dampened any expectation I might have had for his future content.In any case, I think this guy is being way too optimistic about the ability of the sum of the 2026 African officer corps to plan and execute such operations, and I think he handwaves away too much stuff to go Africa's way. What does /k/ think?
>What does /k/ think?I think you're butthurt that Africa has nukes and access to a cottage industry of drones. If the video did just go on then eventually after years Africa would eventually start wiping out population centres.
>>65640778I think he's hand waiving too much of Africa's food security by assuming the rest of the world simply continues to supply both sides. Also somehow Africa can get civilian supplies but Europe can't receive any information from the outside, they're magically just perfectly in the dark unless they get the information by directly by taking it from Africa. Nor can they receive any kind of modern technology, even accidentally through shipping and dealing with the modern outside world. Granted this whole scenario is retarded so African nuclear annihilation is at least some kind of resolution, unless we expect Europe to scare up a nuke and a reasonable delivery system within a year. At least he addressed the elephant in the room of magazine depth and the sheer fact that Europe's armies can just eat losses in a way Africa can't. Also he recognizes that despite the advantages a modern soldier has, they're not immortal supermen, especially when facing a skilled and entrenched enemy
>>65640778He's not british. He's one of those upside down people. But not the boomerang slinging kind.
>>65640875>after years Africa woulddegenerate into internal tribal wars as per usual.
>>65640975Come on now, how's he supposed to know that?He's one of those Mexicans from the place where English was invented in 1945.
>>65640778>BritHe sounds like an Aussie or Kiwi to me.
>>65640778Seems everyone's jumping at the trend while it lastshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxDmYX3p1MQ
>>6564077899% of the work would be south africa and egypt
>>65640875>Rocket scientists sell all the fuel for the missile meant to carry the nuke to men who use it to flavor moonshineOok ook
>>65640778it's good right up until the end when he gives up any semblance of objectivity and shows he's just a you'd have to be racist to think that Africans would lose. now Africa will do what Europe did to it what do you think of that chuds?while also skipping over the fact that the war isn't won by Africans but by Arabs and the handy work that white men left behind by white men that being said, he doesn't address the Spanish enclaves in Africa, that a source of 2026 information right of the starthe doesn't address that after the Cape Verde raid 1939 would know about nukes, how hard it is to refinehe doesn't address the use of gas weapons. just think what a thousand bomber raid of Cairo dropping chemical agents would do to the civilian population. there's be a lot more dead than the 3 nukes dropped combined.
>>65644681>archman he's fallen off over the years
