>>43653651
T drop the LGB
It's not ok to be gay

>>43653651
It's more of a tolerable defect than fully ok. A disability basically.

>>43653651
always has been as far as I was concerned

>>43653667
You can't get disability for being a homosexual but you can for being transsexual

>>43653667
It's okay to be disabled

>>43653651
Your lies won't work here sis.

>>43653662
That hurts to hear!

>>43653651
Yes sis.

>>43653667
If you came upon a man who had fallen to the ground, would you help him up, ignore him, or stand next to him and mock his suffering?

>>43653969
I should tell him it's fully ok to be on the ground. #FallenPride.

>>43654018
mean

it's k im a gay boy with tits and a pussy

>>43654590
inside out penis is not a pussy

wow it must suck cause in 10 years you'll still have to stay this...

>>43654774
why?

>>43653690
>You can get disability just for being trans
Where'd you hear that

>>43653690
that sucks

>>43654590
Omg I’m a gay boy with tits and a weird deformed micro penis that most everybody in passing says is a woman due to height, sound, proportions but guys I’m a total faggot at heart

>>43655232
>everyone ignores my male bone structure
>i magically erased all of my male features with chemicals and everyone is fooled
>dude, just trust me

>>43655246
I mean I’m born with a malformed penis, I’m small, I never experienced a full male puberty, I dunno I’d prefer if they did call me a gay guy it make more sense with my documentation

>>43653651
that is a true statement, but only for america.
After the artifical trans hate is over it will probably go back to anti-gay

>>43656931
Do trans people truly think people hate them for no good reason?

>>43656962
you mean billions of dollar for ads in artifical anti-trans hate?
Social media platforms who intentionally amplify anti-trans posts in order to drive engagement of their users?
Politicans saying vague stuff like transgender ideology, but when they are voted in it's suddenly not actually important at all?
Yeah I guess you can say the hate is for no "good" reason

>>43653651
No

>>43657035
just seems like you are unwilling to engage in good faith with any sort of opposition to your ideology

>>43653662
Yes, drop us please

>>43657127
ok

>>43657127
I would be down for good faith but your arguments are never in good faith, it’s always a “I’m right and your wrong” situation and stalls out before a live and let live sentiment is reached

>>43657307
just seems like maybe trannies could try to see it from a different perspective without being so dismissive

>>43657317
Would you be willing to engage and see it from their perspective? No derogatory statements or names?