How dimorphic is the general forehead slope compared to how far someone's cheek protrudes in relation to it? I've been worming over it for a while, and even though I've had FFS and have no brow ridge, I've been wondering if just having the forehead overhang when looking at someone at 3/4 view is actually clocky or if it's just a non dimorphic facial feature that makes faces look different but not necessarily in a masculine or feminine way. To illustrate, look at this cis woman from a 3/4 view, her forehead slope does not extend past her cheek.Is this something to be concerned about and is it anatomically possible to get this result with a good surgeon? I think it would have to be more aggressive than your typical FFS as I do not think I have enough sinus cavity left to set the whole bone back far enough to remove the slope, and it may end up looking really bad.
>>43659477You've had FFS. I'm sure you're not far off. Angles are to be considered.
>>43659549This is how my forehead slope from a similar angle looks like. From the side, it looks entirely flat, but from a similar angle as the OP photo, I do have a slope. The obvious question here would be - is that dimorphic or is that just a feature that makes my face mine, for a lack of a better term?
>>43659590>is that dimorphic or is that just a feature that makes my face mine, for a lack of a better term?Not entirely sure. That girl is leaning back slightly, but yeah your brow ridge is more prominent. I wouldn't call it dimorphic necessarily.
>>43659738Hm, do I still have a brow ridge? I figured that I did not, I think if anything, those protrusions are mostly the orbital area, but now I'm wondering if I'm gonna need another revision because I get clocked like once or twice every year and I'm just trying to figure out why. I'm kind of reluctant to go for another revision because I don't heal very quickly and FFS recovery is pretty brutal, and I don't even know which surgeon can do something like this. I think potentially only DB does it and only for some patients.
