Why do transgenders not like the male gaze?
They do. Those are transbians, if even this place is full of them imagine reddit
>>43672578but anon, men are either bisexual or gaytrans women are menergo "transbians" are mislabeled bisexualsso they do like menbut comp het has fried their brainsand they think they have to like women to fit in
>>43672576the what
>>43672576She didn't say she didn't like it, she just said it was Icky.
>>43672576Personally, I find it even more "icky" used as a pejorative.The "male gaze" describes a society-wide phenomenon that's pretty much occurring at a statistical level. No singular thing is "the male gaze" and labelling individual things as such is misguided and harmful targeting of a natural part of sexuality for many people, including many "not-male" people! I've literally had a cisbian friend in university who was having anxious breakdowns over the fact her experience of sexuality was "male" because the "male gaze" concept.The "male gaze" does help to frame a legitimate social problem, wherein the majority of media and content fixates on a singular expression of sexuality that is seen as "more marketable" and pushes out other expressions of sexuality or non-sexual narratives from culture at larger. But, in my opinion at least, the problem is not to stop this sexuality from existing at all, nor to stop creating media that caters to this sexuality, but to create more media that depicts or centres on the underrepresented experiences of society.Media is not a "scarce" resource like money. Thanks to reproduction, it's as easy for 1 billion humans to experience the same piece of media as 1 person. We can call media "non-rivalrous consumption" in economic terms, because consuming it doesn't take away someone else's ability to consume it later. So there is no reason to treat media as a zero-sum game, where producing one type of media "takes away" from another type of media. If the private sector is churning "the male gaze" in abundance, great for them! But let's exercise some social responsibility and find other ways to finance and produce diverse perspectives.>t. older transbian
>>43672576The "male gaze" is phony buzzword for misandrists who consider themselves serious feminist thinkers. It took a concept that had a particular narrow meaning to become "whenever any man looks at anything"
>>43672576>the male gaze is so icky>99% likely to be a creepy transbian who does the same exact gaze on women tooWhy are transbians like this?
>>43672704You're too smart for me, transbian. I shan't be reading.
>>43672813You're overthinking it. It just means "man I'm not interested in is staring at me"
>>43672828women are lesbians and are not interested in men in the first place
>>43672842>lesbians>not obsessed with men and cocksLOL
>>43672822This happened to me one time when I was at work on my break time. No less than me shuttering at their sight I'm accused of being a shut in closeted gay. One cant even report them to hr bc they claim victim hood the most when they stir up drama.
>>43672842transbian hands typed this post
>>43672576They can gaze at me but I would like them to be beheaded if they try to follow or talk to me.
