what is the best bottom x top dynamic?
t. Gremlin bottom
>>43689311big & strong x big softy
>>43689311you already know...
maybe the worst one is the one i currently have with my boyfriend where we both used to be top, then i suggested we become sides because i don't really care for anal, but he actively tried to become a vers bottom because sex should be hardcore fucking, and i try it too because i like him and i like the idea of getting dominated and having his huge dick in me, but it's too big and hurts too much, he always gets sad when i pull out, he says he hopes i can train enough that he can fuck my fat ass every day, bottoming or not i dont have the energy for thator maybe its hot idk but it would be hotter if i could actually get the whole thing inside
>>43689311small & pure + grimlin
>>43689311Why does dark bottom look more evil than dark top
>>43689311Chaser who works in factory and comes home sits in couch watching football drinking beer whole day x Passoid tradwife who cooks cleans does groceries sucks his dick eats his shit, is that what y'all wanna hear, also they're siblings
>>43689435who wears the diaper in this relationship?
>>43689440both
>>43689422It's basically like the giant thug vs the creepy little girl tropes. The giant thug instills more fear by virtue of his larger strength and size, so to come close to evoking the same fear the creepy little girls has to be creepy: you know, with an evil smile, by being unpredictable and a serial killer, etc., something like that.
>>43689496ok but who wears the diaper?
>>43689496this makes sense
>>43689496ye small has to overcompensate for the implicitly "innocent" appearance of small big just has to not smile as often and he's "Dark and mysterious"
>>43689311I love both... But if I were in a real relationship with this dynamic? I would rather have a large, scary protector bf.
>>43689311big softy + gremlin in public that immediately turns into big & strong + small & pure in bed
>>43689311Big softy thrall + small & pure vampire
>>43689311honestly i think all relationships should be switch x switch
>>43691259agreed