I've noticed alot of things about lgbt and gays but one of them is how you only see what you want to see. Someone types a paragraph dismantling an lgbt claim, you read a small part of it ignoring the context and then reply sarcastically. Its the same theme over and over
>>43705059is that an example of your idea of a paragraph?
>>43705059>Dismantling an LGBT claimCringe.
>>43705059Drugs are bougie unless you're doing something like huffing paint or huffing the exhaust of a car pipe.
>>43705264most of them literally grow on trees...
>>43705059What's your sample size? Where do you read these paragraphs? What makes you think this pertains in any way to the LGBT community in particular? This is just the way people debate things online because of attention economy being rewarded over truth seeking on social media. Either you're not aware of that, in which case you have no place judging any claims whatsoever, or you are, which makes you a disingenuous, bad faith actor that's not worth engaging with. Either way, go touch some grass and stop worrying about the gays, you obsessive retard.
>>43705305Feels weirdly living in a world where if I grow weed, I get instantly arrested. If your child eats the hemlock I'm growing outside though, that's suddenly legally ambitious and more their fault than mine even though I'm growing literal poison.
>>43705059>one of them is how you only see what you want to see. Someone types a paragraph dismantling a claim that makes you upsetti, you read a small part of it ignoring the context and then reply sarcastically. Its the same theme over and overclap back, woman behavior. man behavior would be punch to the face up to homicidebotftht sides btw
>>43705353ur mum's legally ambitious after i made you a little brother ayooooooooooooooo
