Troons try to define womanhood through feminine stereotypes. Liking pink and shopping, playing with dolls, wearing dresses and makeup. But that framing is incredibly weak. What does it say about women like me, or tomboys, athletes, nerdy girls, or any woman who doesn't fit the girly archetype? Are we not women?*Anyone* can wear a dress or put on makeup. Not everyone can get pregnant, give birth, and nurture new life. Womanhood is the female body and its unique capacities.Motherhood should be presented as one of the most meaningful expressions of female achievement instead of a downgrade or a trap. It respects variation among women while drawing a clear defensible line defined by reality rather than aesthetics.A lot of women who aren't particularly conservative can still recognize when something has gone deeply wrong with the current direction of society. You can use that as a springboard to convince women to take your side. Remember, we are not supposed to be your enemies, not in a natural world. Men and women are two halves of a whole. You'll probably tell me to fuck off but I think you should know that this all has potential to unbrainwash women. Worked for me.
>>43706446repper hands wrote this
>>43706446I'm a conservative tranny and I think both sides politicize our existence to exceptional degrees. It's not that deep, you're forced to think too much about trannies because you are weak and fall for social contagion, not unlike trannies themselves and the grifters that take advantage of their existence. I'm not like you because I have autism, I'm above that. It's not that your views repulse me, they are correct, but you are personally a nitwit. Trannies are not responsible for destroying western civilization, we're along for the ride, and it's not wrong to prioritize your perceived survival. White guilt is destroying western civilization, trannies have low rates of criminality. If anything, they're a substitution good for cis women and can alleviate the male loneliness epidemic. The externalities of trans existence are objectively positive. It's unproductive for a policymaker to think too much about trannies. We should be Chinese, pretend they don't exist. Our policy should be social quietism towards all queers. They are correlated with maladaptive behaviors and they don't reproduce. If you're a rich gay, it's socially permissable, but poor people feed off the system. If you make less than $80k, you are net negative to the system by millions at retirement. We only allow this because we hope their children create intergenerational outcomes. So if you're a poor tranny, it's heinous to elites. I just explained to you guys why you fags are the permanent underclass, there's no metaphysical spook to it, all politicians are atheists.
>>43706446dumb bitcht. cis m
>>43706446Former political party. Made hard the same political party due to insert scapegoat.
>>43706446zero trannies have ever said literally any of this stupid foid
>>43706446>I don't like conservative gender roles>so I decided to side with the conservative gender roles factiondo you have to have sub-80 IQ to be a transphobe?
>>43706446Gigahon hands typed this post
>>43707762TRVKE
>>4370644650% of transphobes complain that trannies don't embrace the female social role and just act like autistic cross dressing menthe other 50% complain that trannies define womanhood through materialistic hyper-femininity surely these should be mutually exclusive, and yet both of these contradictory statements are so prevalent. How many arguments have you had with other "conservatives" about this? Or are you happy to go along with anything as long as it's at our expense?You sound like an NPC who's been brainwashed to care about the [current_thing], dumbass. Atleast you have enough autonomy to actually come here and verbalise your vacuous thoughts so we can humiliate you for your simple mind.
>>43706446>These trannies are so retarded, therefore I've become retarded too!!! That'll teach 'em a lesson!
>>43706446>/pol/
>>43706446Not every woman can or would get pregnant, give birth or nurture a baby. lesbians exist, and so do post menopausal women and even entirely infertile women do too. you have fallen for a conservative clap trap where everything that represents womanhood is boiled down to making a baby for a man and raising the child for him. then we get to the group of people conservatives leave out of the conversation almost entirely. Trans Men. the other side of the tranny coin. the guys who were born and forcibly raised into the role of being a woman in this society, who then are compelled to a sense of dysphoria of living in said bodies and roles and will go so far as to forsake any chance at being fertile to live a life as a man. The trans condition is ultimately a form of being intersex centered on an unmendable separation between the sufferer and their assigned gender. some people in this world are born into bodies that don't match their minds. they grow up in a world that forces them to act against their nature and into a gender role that ends up in many cases driving them into suicide or into mental health instability unless treated with hormone replacement therapy and reintegrated into society as their identified gender.ultimately, the idea of gender and sex as we know it is a subjective creation defined by humans. sure, there are 2 overwhelmingly common ways humans are created, but there are also plenty of people who don't line up with the definitions physically, mentally, socially, what ever and any definition you create will inevitably exclude/include people arbitrarily. the trans panic is a conservative claptrap to get people into returning to a life where men possess women as property and bodily autonomy that interferes with population growth is destroyed. ideas like the ones you have bought into hurt all of those types of women more than accepting the tranny wanting to live a life that doesn't kill her by 35
>>43706446>Troons try to define womanhood through feminine stereotypes. Liking pink and shopping, playing with dolls, wearing dresses and makeup. But that framing is incredibly weak.Honestly this is what pisses me off about troons the most. It's so offensive to see what a bunch of autistic men think "womanhood" is.
>>43706446>Liking pink and shopping, playing with dolls, wearing dresses and makeup. But that framing is incredibly weak. What does it say about women like me, or tomboys, athletes, nerdy girls, or any woman who doesn't fit the girly archetype? Are we not women?You're describing the opposite of conservatism. A conservative DOES believe women are to be kept in the kitchen, that women are born liking pink, and that insufficiently conformist women are deficient.
>>43706446>Troons try to define womanhood through feminine stereotypes.So do cis people
