I'm sure they existed. Do you think they called them names/slurs? Do you think they felt like imposters talking to the other gatherers?
>>43822200no because social exclusion and bigotry are institutions created by "civilized" society
>>43822208Is that Bilbo Baggins?
>>43822228https://youtu.be/QuQbus0xfhk
We oldfags had the meme>berrypicker as fuck
>>43822200Males were the hunters AND the gatherers idiot. A woman's only purpose historically was to have babies.
>>43822240What's that
>>43822200there wasn't a gender divide between hunting and gathering. both genders did both things
>>43822358>a single tribal man can get more than 4000 calories per day alone
>>43822266bring this back...
>>43823840Yes?
>>43823886you cant go back
>>43822358No. Men were hunters and gatherers and so were women. There was not much specialization.
>>43823822shhhh.... dont tell them....i do remember my libchud dad believed agriculture caused misogyny/patriarchy because it made gathering (inherently female) less valuable. disregard the fact you still have to actually do work to do agriculture. he worked in b2b saas i suppose so his concept of labor is a bit detached from the rest of the world
>>43823840women only ate alot to support pregnancy they werent fat year round
>>43823909I imagine females came on hunts to stay males for support and their own safety (not alone at camp) but the idea of a female having the male upper body strength, robustness to survive a combat scenario, and visual-spatial reasoning to kill an animal with like an atlatl or whatever is waaaay too funny to imagine
>>43824559low iq
>>43822200Fyi there's no evidence these sort of gender divides existed in the paleolithic. Men and women equally hunted and gathered. Those divides begin to come about during the neolithic with the advent of agriculture.
