If all women were attractive I wouldn't be this way. But most of them are fat, have gross tattoos and stretch marks from being fat, and have a fish hole that emits an odor that should be banned under the geneva conventions.It's not that men smell so great, it's that the smell triggers the fight or flight reflex and I can fetish that into arousal. Whereas dead fish smell *literally* makes me vomit in my mouth. Obviously that's not conducive to sexual relations.How does anyone even have sex? It doesn't make sense.
Have you tried having sex with women that aren't obese?
>>43823963I don't have the personality (height) for that
>>43824008Always the height cope
>>43824021What's always the height cope? Becoming prison gay? I'm pretty sure that is only one of many ways to height cope.
>>43823944OPs pic is a fat tranny
>>43824008>I don't have the height for thatDefinitely not incel attitude. No idea why you're not drowning in pussy.
>>43824089Negging isn't necessary or productive when the person has already self negged into oblivion
>>43824092This isn't therapy. I'm not gonna abide by the 'necessary'... Whatever the fuck you aren't even really able to quantify. It's just a fact that if you're very hung up on height or other talking points like that, that most women will swerve you. Most men simply aren't +6' yet many are still pounding pussy. So what's the excuse?
>>43824105Do unattractive women not count as women to you? It's an interesting way to see things. But unattractive men are still men, yes?
>>43824105>Most men simply aren't +6'the average height in the US is 5'11. nta but being a manlet with a small dick is why i first developed dysmorphia (which lead to dysphoria)
>>43824118This was talking about attractive women, which you accused would only be interested in height. Nice try trying to move the goalpost, faggot, but if unattractive women are just fine, why are they such an issue to fuck? Why are they 'nor enough' to you? (or OP if it's not you).
>>43824136Please refer back to my earlier statement here >>43824092
>>43824131Wrong. Average is 5'9. Has been for decades. Just going outside proves this, bro. Anyone above 6' sticks out the crowd. You interpret that info into becoming whatever you want, but you people need to stop attaching your personal hangups on raw stats.
>>43823944opinions on pooners?
>>43824139You're an idiot lmao. That doesn't even make sense in this new context. Fine, be a cuck. It's not my life you're fumbling.
>>43824151>Average is 5'9. Has been for decadesmy mistake but i would still be a manlet by that standard. in addition to having a small dick, it was much more sensible for me to troon
>>43824152Never been with one but the ones I've seen on dating apps tend to be obese and have bad facial hair and, I assume, big fat smelly vaginas, which isn't appealing>>43824161It's evident I've offended you, that wasn't necessarily my intent but I'm not going to apologize for it, the thread probably wasn't directed at you anyway
>>43824008That's a you problem bud I'm 5'2 and get laid whenever I want
>>43823944average male statement desu
>>43823944>If all women were attractive I wouldn't be this way. But most of them are fat, have gross tattoos and stretch marks from being fat, and have a fish hole that emits an odor that should be banned under the geneva conventions.I would kill myself if I was American
>>43824522Arabman is that you?
>>438241515'9" is average height in like Elmhurst NY. The vast majority of the US it's closer to 6' especially if you are measuring people below the age of 45
>male talks about the male experience>thot with short hair: ACTUALLY, let me tell you why this is about your desire for my hole, which I deny you access to, even though you never asked! also I'm a boy tee hee if you disagree you're a mansplaining chud
>>43823944back in the day small communities were the main environment, shaming and the threat to your reputation worked, women were more physically active and big food wasn't as evil, so the average woman was still actually attractive instead of being a creature of walmart
