Firsts aren't really all that significant unless the rest of your sex life sucks

>>43927160
i never really cared about it being special, but i would only have sex with someone that i could see myself spending the rest of my life with. i genuinely dont feel any sexual attraction in other situations
im too old to be thinking like this, but im ready to die alone, so whatever

>>43927171
Yeah, it does. I had a first crush in ~10y, found it in me to confess and got (granted very kindly) turned down. I find that I don't know what to do now. There's nothing going on in my life. No aspirations etc.
So not being overly picky on a first. That may worsen my headspace

Ill be honest as someone who hasnt had their first time yet? I have no idea what I want out of it. Ill probably tell them that its my first time anyways but thats just me personally.
Usually I dont go after people im not that attracted to either way so eh

>>43927160
my first time means literally nothing to me and was super disappointing and I dont regret that at all. you need to get it over with so you can start having good sex. but since you decided to put it on a pedestal and now dont have any experience its a major red flag. I would never date or sleep with someone like you and I think a lot of other people wouldnt either

>>43927160
>I'm too old to have no exp- by choice. I'd like my first partner to be someone I'm exceptionally attracted to.. bit like I'm sick of waiting?
that's how they get the bottoms usually - they expose you to a bigger pond than what your realistic pool is, and you end up feeling meh about the people that you'd actually be attracted to
I suggest not falling into the modern woman's trap that social media creates
>raised catholic
should have isolated you from social media in a small decent community to get the proper effect, though christcucks haven't really been very christlike with the gender/sexuality cripples