feminine men aren't women
because of the penis
>>43956880because of their chromosomesif you chop off or reshape the penis, they don't become women
all bottoms are women
so trueeeee but I’m gonna call myself one anyways
>>43956927wrong!!!!!!!!!
I really like this 2 genders and segregation of cultures. It brings out the lost white people, over trying to be someone. The USA is no longer reporting crimes, censored everything, and forced white people into violent out bursts.
>>43956871true. but I dont feel very masculine with a cock up my ass or down my throat.
>>43956871would
>>43956871gibbity gorps aren’t schlorpthat’s what you sound like
>>43956871>fire isnt coldno shit sherlockwho is arguing otherwise?
>>43957105well that's silly
>>43956871OK. What are we supposed to do with this information?
>>43956927Exactly this. Foids have tried for millenia to be exclusive bottoms for men, and stolen the title of woman, but Just as Eve came from a man, so do troons. We cum from men all the time. Coincidence, I think not!
>>43962877detransition
you can't see chromosomes. that's why your argument of chromosomes makes them men is in bad faith. the, we can always tell crowd, can't always tell. they harass cis women that don't conform to their ideal of womanhood. if you could always tell, you wouldn't be harassing cis women because you mistook them for a tranny. that means you're paranoid. paranoia is in line with being a schizo. schizo's hold beliefs not grounded in reality like they can always tell or they can somehow see chromosomes. you can't see chromosomes retard. so saying chromosomes is disingenuous.how do you see chromosomes? oh. you can't? you have to do a blood test for it? then that means you can't see it with the naked eye. which means you can't always tell. so when they say trans rights are human rights, it means people will go on a witch hunt for trannies and women will get burned for it.
>>43956871But they are hot
>>43963360chromosomes form proteins. proteins can form structures and shapes that are recognizable. your argument is invalid.
>>43956888but chromosomes don't determine your sex
>>43963373did you see chromosomes or proteins and structures?proteins and structures?then you didn't see chromosomes. so quit your bullshit.if you can't see chromosomes with your naked eye, then it's not chromosomes. if you try to say it's the proteins and structures formed as a result of the chromosomes, then it's not the chromosomes you're observing, but the proteins and structures. meaning. what makes them men or women is structures. so if it's structures. what do we call that? what do we call observable proteins and structures? i know the answer. you don't cause you're a fucking clown. you don't know shit. you know how to vomit the cum bigots dumped down your throat because you can't think critically.what are proteins and structures developped from chromosomes called? what is that observation phenomenon called? it's one word. it's really easy, but you're so retarded i have to spoon feed you the answers only for you to spit it back in my face. i'm done. fuck yourself you lying pos.you know why people don't like you? because you're full of shit. you lie. you act in bad faith. you don't listen. you don't learn.
>>43963450the chromosomes are the direct cause of the shape of the structures
>>43956871sometimes, if they are lucky, they can end up passing and basically living their life like a woman. and that’s generally the goal. the most self aware tranners understand they are not full blown women, but they get to be look like a woman and be treated like one and that’s enough
>>43963474it's sexist to claim men and women are treated differently
>>43963493so what? it's also true.
>>43963504it isn't true
>>43963513where do you live that perfect egalitarianism is your day to day experience?
>>43963493ironically parroting dumb twitter talking points is pointless
>>43963453can you see the chromosomes or do you see the structures? what's are observable structures called?you don't know the answer cause you're a tard. you want to draw this imaginary line in the sand because you're a schizo. when a baby is born the doctor looks at it's crotch and determines it's sex. did the doctor do a blood test? did the doctor carytotype their genes? no. they observed the structure and made a determination. what are observable structures called? they're not chromosomes. so to keep saying chromosomes means you're don't have any.
>>43963548you are not explaining how I am wrong
>>43963604you can't see chromosomes. structures and proteins aren't chromosomes. you don't understand how basic biology works.structures and proteins develop as a result of androgenic exposure, reception, and utilization or a lack there of. you don't get a penis because you have xy chromosomes. you get a penis from androgens in the womb. hence sometimes we'll have people born without a penis that have xy and people born with a penis that are xx. meaning chromosomes are not the determinant, but a contributor.
>>43963628no, I mean about men and women being treated differentlythat's a lost battle since you won't acknowledge the existence of multi-step processes or indirect effectsreally and truly the question is "do chromosomes or hormones more influence gendered phenotype"
>>43963638pivot so hard it looks like travelling
>>43963700I'm not pivoting at all. It's just fruitless to explain how chromosomes work to people who don't believe in them.
bump
>43965178Rip your head off lmao
>>43965491no u
>>43965526
>>43965567not clicking the thumbnail
>>43963404democrats doyeah
>>43965616what
Nobody said they were?
