into any body, our society should move to mass testosteronization planning.99% of the population should be testosteronized for maximum efficiency. estrogen makes you weaker physically and fatter. once a majority of the populace has done so, we will have eliminated conventional lust and after a 100 years these citizens of the testosterinized world government will create neo-lust based on testosterinized bodies. no-one will like femme, estrogenized, women or woman bodies and in factWOMAN ARE ABOLISHED.however, not quite ...I said 99% of the population are blocked off from estrogen and receive only testosterone.but what about the 1%?these are the ruling class of this feudal world orderthe 1% will be estrogenized, identify as the only woman that are alive and will do surgeries on themselves (have all capital since they reap off the profits off the 99% of testoertized humans' labor) to become peak female beauty. that 1% of humanity will reproduce and the sexiest of the 99% will come to the 1% to reproduce with the 1%.humanity's future will just be children of the 1% estrogenizedwould you live in this world and why do you think this would not advance society?
>we will have eliminated conventional lust and after a 100 years these citizens of the testosterinized world government will create neo-lust based on testosterinized bodiesgays already exist thoother than that great schizopost, could elaborate more, 7/10
>>44019316Your feudal world manifesto is a hilarious internet fantasy completely bankrupted by actual laboratory science. Stating that society should 'abolish women' because reproductive eggs can be inserted anywhere shows you don't understand basic biology or cellular architecture. Real reproductive science proves that female biology holds the literal monopoly on creating life. In peer-reviewed mammalian trials, combining two maternal genomes (egg + egg) via genetic imprinting modifications successfully produced perfectly healthy, viable offspring that grew up to reproduce naturally. When researchers tried the same process combining two paternal cells (sperm + sperm), it completely crashed. The embryos suffered from severe structural defects and died instantly. A male frame simply lacks the biological infrastructure to support life on its own. Sperm carries nothing but half a nuclear DNA packet, while the maternal egg cell provides 100% of the mitochondrial DNA, the actual metabolic engine that drives cell division and organ development. On top of that, the Y chromosome is a highly degraded piece of genetic material that has lost over 90% of its original genes over evolutionary time, leaving XY bodies with zero genetic backup systems. You are hiding behind a sci-fi screen script because you can't handle the fact that material reality is 100% dependent on the biological female sex class to even exist.
this is basically a more totalitarian and gynocentric (and therefore inhuman) version of the femboy statehttps://archived.moe/lgbt/thread/43665781/>would you live in this world and why do you think this would not advance society?hell no. testosterone is poison.
>>44019837tired and derivative, 2/10
>>44019837>You are hiding behind a sci-fi screen script because you can't handle the fact that material reality is 100% dependent on the biological female sex class to even exist.Holy projection.Additionally, mammalian trials? Therefore its as dead in the water as water turning into wine?Any scientist who denies the possibility of further developments ever leading to scientific revolution belongs in a desk crunching numbers, not designing or conceptualizing.You give up on the possibility of change based on the fact of the Y chromosome's degeneration and prior trials of prior crashes, yet I don't find this to be definitive dead in the water claim that the supposed male frame cannot withstand embryos, what have you.What are your thoughts on transhumanism because you seem to have a very anthrocentric view of history and the future, assuming the human form by itself is the end-destination of human self-construction OR did you not even think this is a transhumanist through-line because you immediately projected that this was some tranny delusion and in that case, is the tranny in the room right now because I'm not one!With all that being said a statement is different from an "if statement." - its a hypothetical you moron! I've never met a sincerely dumber post on 4tran than yours, friend. And its fucking 4tran.You also didn't answer my question you solo brain cell: would you live in this HYPOTHETICAL reality and HYPOTHETICALLY would it advance society?People with so little creative capacity like yourself are NPCs of the highest order. Beep boop elsewhere you slave!
>>44019837>On top of that, the Y chromosome is a highly degraded piece of genetic material that has lost over 90% of its original genes over evolutionary time, leaving XY bodies with zero genetic backup systemsFAGGOTBABBLE TRANSLATOR ACTIVATING!>i wonder how smart I can make myself sound without having to make rational claims with sources...
>>44020048Hiding behind the word 'hypothetical' and screaming insults about transhumanism doesn't save your sci-fi fantasy from basic physical reality. You're throwing a tantrum on an anonymous board because your playground scenario completely bricked the moment it hit hard laboratory facts. You want sources? Look up the 2018 study from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Li et al., Cell Stem Cell) where bimaternal (egg + egg) mice successfully reproduced, while bipaternal (sperm + sperm) embryos suffered from severe developmental defects and died instantly. Look up the Whitehead Institute's research on Y-chromosome degradation, mapping how it lost 90% of its original ancestral genes. Real science isn't 'faggotbabble' or a lack of imagination; it is the literal architecture of the physical universe. Real transhumanism operates on actual bio-engineering and material constraints, not on empty online delusions about forcing 99% of the population onto a hormone script that would trigger immediate, massive metabolic collapse and demographic sterilisation. To answer your question: No, your hypothetical world wouldn't advance society. It would completely wipe out the human species within a generation. You are an internet chaser throwing a multi-paragraph fit because a real woman used actual peer-reviewed journals to lock you out of your own sci-fi script.
>>44020078wrong reply, i'm not OP or the poster who replied to you>search up the whitehead insti-that is not a real NIH study and it's a theoretical article, imagine being so retarded you dont even know how to cite a source
>>44020092Calling foundational genetic sequencing 'theoretical' just proves you don't even know how to navigate a basic scientific index. The 2018 Chinese Academy of Sciences study published in Cell Stem Cell is an empirical, live laboratory trial mapping out exact mammalian reproduction boundaries, not a theory. Your processing power completely bricks the second a biological woman drops real, verifiable citations on your head, leaving you stuttering about search bars because you cannot counter the hard architecture of human genetics
>>44020134>The 2018 chinese academy of sciences study published in cell stem celli have left you sperging since you don't understand that I'm not referencing the part of your post directed towards the person you think you were replying to >Calling foundational genetic sequencing theoretical not what i'm talking about, continue sperging in your next reply
>>44019316>chaser>man obsessed faggotlmfao, well, at least you're honestsage nigger
>TERFs having meltie over joke hypotheticalNO FUN ALLOWED
>>44019316did you watch the orville, op?
>>44020078https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05834-xhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2425307122
