Yes. You're spreading your personal mental torment around. You're making it look sexy and appealing. This is not a thing you should be letting out of your head. Some things should stay inside your head.

>>44034635
what do you mean

>>44034648
It is irresponsible to flaunt this sort of fetish, you want as few people as possible to have this fetish. It is a curse to want something like this.

>>44034669
isn't that true for most kinks though? I can't really think of any fetishes that aren't disgusting, ego dystonic and/or humiliating

>>44034678
Nah, no, not actually. There are a lot less dangerous kinks than wanting to get raped.

>>44034681
i never said dangerous, which is I think is irrelevant to this question anyway
very few people go live out their kinks and if someone reads my post and decides to live it out, then I say "natural selection"

>>44034699
Okay, then that is what is wrong. You asked.

>>44034705
what is wrong? I don't understand

>>44034711
OP asked >>44034567
Is it wrong that I dadadada, and I am arguing that yes, it's wrong to post about it because if someone does read this post and it makes them more likely to get raped, you'd be morally culpable for that.
You asked.

>>44034729
you seem kinda weird but okay

>>44034567
>is it wrong to fantasize about taboo things
what are you, catholic? who cares. is it wrong to play violent video games, even though in real life we abhor violence?

>>44034678
guy who's only seen boss baby watching his second movie: getting a lot of boss baby vibes from this...

>>44034699
what does natural selection have to do with what you're doing? a species' gene pool shifting in response to environmental pressures doesn't have anything to do with you posting about your fetishes.

do you try to rationalize everything you say and do by gesturing at unrelated things?

>>44034986
I don't understand your post