Undeniable proof that trannies are malebrained and pooners are fembrained.
#transareoverparty #dropthet #gayNOTqueer
why such little variance for the cis?
Somehow cis men believe themselves to be superior
>>44043684Out of all things I SAT pass. Regardless it's a fake ass test
>>44043801it's not a fake test it's just not a useful metric for aptitude
i never got a degree but the last time i took the SAT (over a decade ago) I pushed an 6ft Audio Visual Equipment cart down a flight of concrete stairs and didn't get caught since I used an elevator to escape.
>>44043865or should say while everyone else was taking the SAT. I'd like to think I passed a much bigger test
>>44043684the whiskers are more interesting to look at
>>44043874they made a cat take the SAT?
>>44043684Why are trans women smarter than cis men?
>>44043684Wrong
>>44043684I'm ftm and literally fell asleep during the SAT. I wasn't never meant to be a cog in the machine, so it's all good. I assumed SAT stuff was for bots.
>>44043874that's what i was thinking
being low iq retard is female brained
>>44043684>>44043874Lmao the whiskers are probably the variability between HSTS and AGP troon results, and whatever the FTM equivalent would be. Hussies stay losing
>>44044193to be fair >n=16>n=38is a pretty low number of participants
>>44043684I tried to do a SAT test (Bundle 5) for fun to see how I would score, I did 1 module each and did 1 mistake each time, so that would give me a score of 1,550-1,590. This is so easyhttps://satsuite.collegeboard.org/practice/practice-tests/paper>t. not American nor native English-speaker
>>44043684i got a 1310 on my SAT so it feels good knowing im not as smart as and maybe even a bit more fembrained the other trannies.
>>44043684Why are FEmales so fucking stupid? I thought they were the smart and empathetic sex?
>>44044476intellect is not a gendered trait nona :( your brain is a beautiful organ i implore you please value it
>>44044193idk how Blaire is touted as passing with a midface like that
>>44044494yea but i find the really malebrained "really smart" trannies really friggin obnoxiouss and i'm glad im not one of them. plus im still smart!!! 1310 is a good score!! i know things! it's just not like a *really* good score
>>44044549trying too hard
>>44043684lol why are nonbinaries actually so firmly in exactly the middle? thats hilarious
>>44043684thats transwomen are superior*
>>44043684I'm apoon who did TERRIBLE on the SAT. But I make my own jobs so it didn't matter.
>>44043684theyfabs won
>>44046166About half of NBs are insecure trans women raising the average and the other half is cis women pulling the average down.
>>44043770diversitytards getting gibs, both the>rainwoman 245iq eating her toejam while rambling about AGPL didnt go far enough at the oral examand the>80iq poon downie in a wheelchair having a gender experiment since she's already out of the gene pool
>>44046294>having a gender experiment since she's already out of the gene poolYou can have your own kid as a poon unless you're some kind of intersex
>>44043684
>>44043684REMEMBER from last thread this is NYU 'PLICANTS. they gotta pay like 90$ to apply
>>44046464lel'd
>>44043770sample size is much smaller for the trans categories so their confidence intervals are larger
>>44043770>>44046924To explain a bit better, this chart doesn't show the variance (or standard deviation) at all. It would be ridiculous if ~15% of cis male applicants scored precisely between 1365 and 1370. The distribution is likely wider than that. This chart shows the mean and confidence interval around the mean. Basically we're assuming that there's some "true" distribution (among people who might have applied to NYU) in the population and the data we have is a random sample from that distribution (people who actually applied to NYU).So since the sample size for cis men and cis women is so high we can be reasonably confident that the true mean is close to the sample mean. So if we were able to actually survey everyone who might have applied to NYU the mean of that sample would be somewhere between 1365-1370. Whereas for trans applicants because the sample size is so low, we might have accidentally got one really stupid trans man or something so if we surveyed the whole population the mean might be higher or lower, we just dont have the data to say for sure.The fact that this chart doesnt show the standard deviation should make you suspicious. The values shown all lie within ~5% of each other. Likely the distributions overlap so heavily that it destroys the point this graph is supposed to be making
>>44043684mine was like 960 it's not even on the chart lol
>>44043812
>>44047159would violin plots be less misleading here?
>>44047233yes. This is what i could reconstruct from the data in the chart. The stddev for the cis applicants is a bit shit though since the whiskers are so tiny and the actual numbers aren't shown.
>>44047584haha damn nice, would it make sense to make one with the y axis starting from 0 too?
>>44043684Wait so are nonbinary people smarter than women
>>44048162(cave johnson voice) its less women per women
>>44048169The implication of that is interesting
>>44043684The scores have so little variation (a 62 point difference which could be 2-5 questions of difference max) that you can't meaningfully take away data from this. In addition I think these should be weighted against fields each student is pursuing as trans women disproportionately go into mathematical fields like comp sci and engineering while trans men (and most of them are trans mascs that identify as afab more than they do as men) usually go for artistic and social science degrees. >>44044036Wauw ur so sigma. Wanna be my chad bf?
>>44043897trans woman are blessed by the goddess, but also cursed with troondom
>>44043684i got a higher score than any of the ranges and im theymab enby. maybe trans exclusive radical misogyny was right all along
>>44043924It makes sense that gaydens are the most intellectual <3
