The reason being that you are a massive retard

>>44147220
genuinely how is the "trannies think liking boy things makes you a boy" psyop so rampant? nobody but tumblrites and performative cissoids ever believed that

trans women are feminine men who don't believe in feminine men

>you can't be a girl, you played with hot wheels
>just because you didn't play with hot wheels doesn't mean you're a girl
this is just the "masculine trannies aren't women because they're masculine, feminine trannies aren't women because they think women are a stereotype" trick but applied differently

File: boy.png (3.05 MB, 1920x1080)

3.05 MB PNG

hi chuddy! here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for your post.

>>44147503
i wish a boy toy would wreck my department

File: wish.png (2.75 MB, 1920x1080)

2.75 MB PNG

>>44147508
here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for that response.

>>44147317
my hot ass girlfriend is a tomboy and likes to work on cars and guitars and knows more abt artilarry than you and ik shes a woman because she eat hot chip and LIE

>>44147220
Note that if the example of sexism were about a preference allowed for girls and disallowed for boys, the corresponding example of feminism would not meaningfully differ.

>>44147220
the reason it feels like that is that you're an idiot

>>44147220
The "gender ideology" take is correct though. Every blue collar dyke out there who does outside jobs played with toy trucks as a kid. Fact. idk why society doesn't like to acknowledge that homos and lesbians are very, very obviously differently brain-sexed, and often phenotypically as well, and literally everyone call tell just by looking at them.

File: Screenshot_20260708_08444(...).jpg (487 KB, 1080x1597)

487 KB JPG

>>44147308
>how
Because you retards won't stop posting and liking shit like this

>>44147921
I think it's funny how every time /tttt/ accuses me of making a person up some random anon comes in with screenshots of that exact type of person saying the exact type of shit i was talking about lmao

>>44147220
>sexism: only girls can wear dresses
>feminism: girls don't have to wear dresses
>"gender ideology": boys can also wear dresses
>feminism: no they can't that's a fetish and rape and disgusting and it'd be really hot if my boyfriend killed anyone creepy and misogynistic enough to do that

>>44147938
i think its funny you cant differentiate personal experience from political doctrine

>>44147981
Let me correct it for you, sir.
>sexism: girls wear dresses
>feminism: girls don't have to wear dresses
>"gender ideology": if a boy wears dresses he must want to be a girl
>gender criticals: that is regressing women to stereotypes that only women wear dresses and that anyone who does so must be a woman, instead of saying anyone can wear a dress.

Another for you:

Sexism: Only girls can play with dolls
Feminism: Girls do not have to play with dolls
Gender ideology: if a boy plays with dolls that means he isn't a boy, he is a girl.
gender criticals: both girls and boys can play with dolls, it has nothing to do with sex or gender.

>>44148143
>anyone can wear a dress
When will you stop pretending this is true? You're hurting amabs that want to wear dresses and you don't give a single fuck about it. No, you can't wear a dress as a masculine presenting person and not be considered a retard or a clown or just ugly in any Western society, no matter how progressive. And you will never be able to do it because amabs are not interested in wearing dresses in general, and amabs do not wear them in significant amounts, and it will never change no matter how progressive the people will get. You have to be presenting female to wear a dress, de facto. Statements like this are just a blatant attempt to take away HRT from these amabs because they're not compliant with your ideology.

>>44147503
Board hero.

>>44148150
Very true!

>>44147540
Your tumblr show flopped vivzieflop

>>44147220
explain ppl like lauriewired then

she is the most intelligent beautiful ultranerd youtuber girl that ever lived

>>44147308
if by tumblrites you mean fandomshitters then yeah, but even people there at least understand that "reasoning" is stupid as hell

>>44147317
trvke

>>44147308
Because this is the Epsteinian Psyop board on the Epsteinian Psyop Website

File: hero.png (1.26 MB, 1920x1080)

1.26 MB PNG

>>44148157
here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for that response.

File: flopped.png (2.49 MB, 1920x1080)

2.49 MB PNG

>>44148248
here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for that response.
here is a supplementary hazbin hotel video for that response. https://youtu.be/i_f2tW-nwo8

File: transparents.png (864 KB, 1080x1041)

864 KB PNG

>>44147220
MF's can't do nuance anymore huh. I think the most honest answer would be that if your child starts displaying atypical behavior for their gender, you should probably file that away as a potential "sign" and maybe consider preparing for if it does later turn out the child is trans. That being said, you should NEVER take this as an opportunity to ask a literal toddler what they think about gender, and NEVER EVER EVER use that info to take immediate action.
The transphobes are right on at least one count: kids frequently change their minds about things on a dime. Which is why chemical and surgical intervention of children is not actually allowed in most of the country AFAIK