She’s 6’6 . What’s your excuse?
>>44213226i'm 5'6 and i'm a hon at this height. height isn't everything.
>>44213226Holy shit
>>44213226>6' 6">born female and there it is
Trannies at 6.5ft are going to be ectomorphic longboi males
>>44213355Yeah. Your proportions just kinda get fucked. Im 6'3 and been trying really hard to be fem with good hrt and I still look like this. It's depressing but at least it's not repressing.
>>44213226 which man is which?
>>44213226You can get away with one or two male features like height. But please show me a cis girl who has a combo of being tall, has wide shoulders, long midface, protruding brow, masculine jawline, no hips, flat chest, and a faggy moid voice. Sometimes it's literally over and you can't do anything about it
>>44213226notice how much taller her inseam is compared to haaland. tall women are just normal women with long legs, if you have short legs it’s over
>>44213226Unrelated but i wanna have haalands babies
>>44213438girl you looks fine
>>44213438girl you are just fine. you have a noticeable difference between your shoulders and hips, and your waist. take a breath
>>44213565proportionally short legs, specificallyi'm a short man, so while in terms of raw height i'm good, i'm still proportionally fucked by having a short-legged male skeletonlimb lengthening surgery could be a viable option to improve that stat for particularly short men, though...
>>44213226I’m not 6’6
>>44213226so looking pretty is gender?
>>44213438hopefuel
>>44213226my shoulders are wide and my hips are narrow
>>44213226i havent been on hrt long enough to say but i think my face will be semipassing. but im the tallest person in my entire extended family of very tall people. should i just rope atp
>>44214921you're asking the hopefuel poster for an honest answer?
>>44214924good point
>>44214924nona the correct response is "don't kill yourself"
>>44213226wtf she's so attractive
>>44214113Im pretty sure women tend to have shorter legs than men on average, but I'm sure telling you that won't make you feel any better
>>44215558nta, I was about to lambast you until I looked into it and found out you're actually right. Kinda blown away rn desu. It must just be due to preference that we falsely assume those proportion averages to be true.
>>44213226WHR
>>44213226anyone else used to crush on some wnba players? felt weird to mention as a guy but if i'm being honest
>>44213226damn bitch hot>>44213438pls repost in tighter or skimpier clothing
>>44215558>>44215759i don't believe you for a second, especially when i'm currently out in a decently crowded place with plenty of people to look at to compareif you're talking about longer legs on average, yeah, men likely win on that front since they're obviously taller on average. what i'm referring to is inseam as compared to height: take a man and a woman with the same height, 99 times out of 100 the woman will have longer legs than the man, and conversely the man will have a longer torso
