"Bi"sexual men are basically heterosexual men who wanna feel submissive and feminine sometimes.
>>44217253What about bi tops?
Trvke for bi switches. Not so for bi tops, they’re pretty much straight though but with less insecurity.
i thought we were rapists? i cant keep the definition of bisexual straight anymore
>>44217253I'm not submissive at all I just fell for the "trannies are real women" psyop and thought it wasn't gay to top them and then eventually realized I like their bodies in a way different to cis women and then eventually got comfortable enough that feminine boys work for me to. I fell down the slippery slope
>>44217314>>44217326Bi tops are either gay tops with internalized homophobia who claim liking women but they never fuck one or straight men open to fuck trannies.
>>44217253This is true on like 4chan, but in real life, the opposite. Hence the popular perception that they're basically just gay. Although this might have been a selection effect due to past norms idk
>>44217314All things that are cute enough are my breeding material
>>44217253No, I'm just not a retard. One needs to be especially mentally handicapped in order to not be able to see the beauty in both the masculine and feminine form
I don't view sex as an act of dominance or submission.
>>44217253I feel submissive when someone is more feminine and more dominant when someone is more masculine.
>>44217314Bi tops are just regular hetero men
>>44217253No I'm a heterosexual man who thinks that past a certain point of femininity you're a woman regardless of what's in your pants
>>44217253Around a third of bisexual men are autogynephilic and there's nothing wrong with that.
