Female heterosexuality, in the sense that women are sexually attracted to and physically desire men, does not exist. I don't just mean that their sex drives are lower than men's or that they are pickier than men. I don't mean that they need to develop an emotional bond before feeling sexual attraction to a man. I mean that practically no woman has ever felt genuine sexual desire for a man, and this has been the case for all of human history.
Many here are already familiar with the idea that women only put up with men and have bare minimum starfish sex with him so that they can acquire access to his support and resources. Most believe in the idea of "chadsexuality", or that women are only attracted to an ever-dwindling percentage of men. In reality, even Chads are not sexually desired by women. When women do derive pleasure from sex with men (an increasingly rare phenomenon), it is due to the fulfillment of autogynephilic desires. The rush of feeling desired, being worshipped, and receiving attention from a man is what the woman truly wants. Notice how none of those things are inherently sexual. It is simply that, for most women, they must allow men access to their bodies in order to receive those benefits.
>>44218714Fvlsenvke, go look in women’s romance sections and read one of those novels.
In terms of true physical desire, the same that men have for women (or gay men for each other), nearly 100 percent of women are lesbian. Not bisexual, but lesbian. Women are only truly attracted to each other, and not men at all. At best, they may find the men they have sex with aesthetically pleasing, the same way you might find a sculpture, but most are outright disgusted by the male form. The only reason women aren't only fucking each other and humans aren't extinct is because women were property for 99% of human existence, and even when they were given autonomy, they were still taught that heterosexuality is the norm. This is known as compulsive heterosexuality, or comphet for short. As women gain more autonomy and become less reliant on men to survive or fulfill their autogynephilic desires, they awaken to their inherent lesbian nature and swear off men entirely. I predict that within the next few generations, any woman that does not have a conservative upbringing will identify as lesbian.
The only female humans who are an exception to this are trans men. In the extremely rare circumstance that a female is born with innate sexual desire for the male body, her autogynephilic tendencies demand that she must look like a man, too. This means, as a man, your only options are to statusmaxx for a woman who doesn't actually love you (increasingly difficult as women become more independent) (this also includes tranny chasing, as passing trans women are as picky as women), become a gaynon, find a pooner bf, pay a prostitute, or remain celibate for life. Choose whichever is most desirable for you.
>>44218728>go look at AGP shit
>>44218714this is why androphiles are faketrans
>>44218714A female experiencing genuine sexual desire for men usually ends up transitioning.
>>44218714i hope a boulder crushes you for not just your idiocy, but your need to share your idiocy
>>44218744>her autogynephilic tendencies demand that she must look like a manWouldn't it be more likely that women develop autoandrophilia due to their unnatural levels of androphilia?
hi chuddy! here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for your post.
>>44219421thanks. to answer the question, we shouldn't. the female imitation of heterosexuality is an awkward and forced performance.
>>44219603here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for that response.
>>44219236sounds comfy desu
